Geno Smith, is Sanchez lite. Read the reports. Inability to get beyond the first or second read, bad footwork. And reports of his deep ball accuracy were effectively dismantled by Mayock at the combine.
all coachable and expected weakness' of a rookie qb. i am betting the deep ball gets better with the footwork.i think he could be the qb we are looking for and you just can't pass up those oppurtunities when they are there. don't get me wrong, jordan with the 4 and warmack with the 9 is enticing but the shot at a qb is to enticing
Woody absolutely spends money. I think people are just really annoyed because we've seen the Jets shell out big bucks and extensions to guys like Holmes and Sanchez who either didnt deserve it or haven't lived up to it and now when it comes time to pay their star player the Jets are in cap hell and don't have much money to spend because of some of those bad decisions.
A. What's low balling a 28yr old injured CB? B. Bullshit C\D. You call people dumb for wanting to trade mevis for unknowns, then say you can build the offense with unknowns? Care to explain that logic? Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using Tapatalk HD
he should atleast make Revis an offer and if he really wants to be a "Jet for life" like he says he will take it. 4 yr/52 mil (30 guaranteed) or 5 yr/65 mil (45 guaranteed) - would be my max offer. should be more than enough for a cornerback.
A- low-balling is watching other elite talents get huge deals and he doesnt't B- you think fans will flood Metlife after he trades Revis, ha! try again mutta sucka C- we're using our original picks to build up through the draft, we have to use them yet thinking trading Revis will give us anything but ?'s is absurd. So we trade Revis and draft a pass rusher or a QB or whatever and they suck then what. What if our pass D worsens without him, people say it was good without him but team didn't pass on us much last year and we played a shit schedule. I'd love to see the secondary without Revis vs the teams we play next year point is keep your good players, stop signing free agents to big deals, build through the draft the most I'd give Revis is 14M a year(7/99M, 6/85M, 5/70M) all plausible deals if we manage the draft properly for the next few years instead of throwing away our picks. I blame Tanny for his nonsense
we played 4 good teams New England- L,L Pittsburgh- L San Francisco- L Houston- L any defense looks good playing our shit schedule
The shitty ass position where in financially he prob can't pay Revis, definitely not 16 Mil a year. Might be time to move on.
And the Colts. The only team with a winning record the Jets have beaten in the last 2 years. Just saying.
Now that's a guy who gets it. And to get back on point, Hell yes woody is cheap. Where is the stadium in NYC again? Oh there isn't one? What we have to continue to share a stadium with who? Really Woody. PSL's anyone.....
A. He was the 2nd highest paid corner in the league last year, and his current contract has the 2nd highest $PY in the league. Johnathan Joeseph who was the same age, considered a top 5 CB and not coming off an ACL tear got 5 years 48.75 only 23M guaranteed. B. Yes, The market is big enough all 8 games will sell well (plus the money isn't in tickets anyway it is in the TV deal)
Revis is a great player but the sport of Football is way too tough for anybody to get a 7-year contract. Only possible exception I can think of is a franchise QB coming out of a rookie contract.
I am one of the people who said Woody does not want to pay Revis. You think he does? It is ridiculous for you or anyone else to say this is the same thing as saying Woody does not, has not, spent money. Sure he has. He was fine with Tanny extending the guarantee on Sanchez's contract last year. He was fine with other high priced contracts, and the totally wasted salary for Tebow last year. All those are facts that cannot be denied, and no one including me has. But of course whether Woody spends money wisely is an entirely different question. Now if Woody did want to pay Revis, why is he trying to deal him? OF COURSE Woody does not want to pay Revis. The whole concept of trading him is to let some other team come to a long term deal with him, which by definition is, or more accurately becomes, the market rate for his worth. Woody wants to let someone else do that without even trying to come to a deal with Revis. We can debate all day why that is the case. We can discuss whether he is right or wrong. But it is ludicrous to suggest that Woody wants to pay Revis. Do you think Wood y WANTS TO PAY REVIS???? What a terrible OP. No one said Woody is cheap. I said he doesn't know shit about football, and has decided HE does not want to pay Revis what the market will pay him. It is idiotic to argue otherwise.
Get back to us when A:woody sets the salary cap .....or B: the salary cap is aboished and woody refuses to go Steinbrenner. Woody apparently understands the salary cap and it's ramifications far better than you do. It's idiotic to argue otherwise.. (P.S. why do you think Mevi$walked back his comments, and now wants to remain a Jet? His agents explained his actual Market Value to ho him, in the context of today's reality. The fact is teams are managing the cap for the entire roster not 4 stars and 49 throwaways. (see Ryan, Rex, hard knocks)) In today's market his FMV is north of 6 and south of 7 million over four, before he moves to safety, like Woodson did, then it's new contract time.
As far as where I get this from, other than logical deduction, there was the link on the Niners thread yesterday, as well as this link to ESPN: http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/sto...ner-woody-johnson-deal-darrelle-revis-not-him As noted, and the article is correct, the Jets entered into the current deal with Revis with the notion and basic concept that they would renegotiate his deal this off season. They have not even tried to do so. It makes no sense. I am convinced that all those posters here who argue for trading him are not only not thinking clearly, they are subconsciously motivated by the notion that he is going to be traded, anyway, so let's try and convince ourselves that is a good thing. It is not a good thing.
For the record, I have Hobbes on ignore, but I assume he is arguing some nonsense argument again like he always does. Moving along here...
