We're gonna pick 4 players in the draft

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Br4d, Apr 28, 2007.

  1. islesfan

    islesfan New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd rather have a management team that wasn't cookie cutter and was pro-active rather than one that always looked for quantity, disregarding value and need, and just took what was available because they were afraid to make moves.
     
  2. islesfan

    islesfan New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    If the quality isn't there, go for quantity. If the quality is there and matches your needs, you gotta go for quality.
     
  3. GreenGreek

    GreenGreek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2002
    Messages:
    2,185
    Likes Received:
    547
    Everybody who is preaching quality over quantity is 100% right. We don't have many available roster spots. We had very few FAs or cap casualties. There is probably only a couple of roster spots available to draft picks this year, and we ended up with what are likely 2 immediate starters.
     
  4. dabrowsk1

    dabrowsk1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,519
    Likes Received:
    7
    I agree here. They players we got are great and I am happy with them. But the right side of the OL is a HUGE need. Moore has more penalties than Mangold and Brick combined last year. And Clement is a journeyman and not the long term answer by any stretch of the imagination. The run blocking last year was horrid. Where exactly is Jones going to run if there are no holes? On top of that, Kendall is getting old fast, where is his heir apparent? We desperately needed to use a day one pick the OL.

    Once again love the players, but the Jets needed to get more picks not less. Too many positions/issues were left unaddressed.
     
  5. Namath2Kolber

    Namath2Kolber New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    Anyone who is complaining about all the picks the Jets gave up is just pissed cuz us fans are now gonna miss out on the fun of watching the Jets make more picks. But really there aren't any empty spots on the team. The Jets don't necessarily need 5 players right now. Tanenbaum obviously loved Revis and I trust him. Then he saw Harris slip past the point he should have and jumped on the opportunity. I like the moves.

    As for the O-line, I definitely want to see that get addressed. Still, it is possible to get quality guys in the 6th round, 7th round, or after the draft entirely. And you can say those guys are just tackling dummies. But Marques Colston wasn't a tackling dummy last year. And there are a ton of other similar success stories. That and the fact that maybe the Jets will trade Barton, McCareins, or someone else for a solid guard. I have a feeling the Jets will, one way or another, get a new guy on the O-line. If they don't, I agree with the hesitant mindset on today's moves but I'm gonna give Tanenbaum the benefit of the doubt for now.
     
  6. JetsUK

    JetsUK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2003
    Messages:
    6,933
    Likes Received:
    2,920
    We are almost certain to trade one or more players today for late round picks.

    Even if we dont we have got (what appear to be) two very good players. Anyone coming out of a draft with two starter quality players has done well.

    Go look at a review of last years draft. The majority of players drafted are already cut, or with another team, or stuck on practice squads. Very few teams (other than the jets) got more than two productive players.

    But yeah i am sure that a bunch of guys that post on forums know WAY better than tangini and their team.
     
  7. rockyusmc2003

    rockyusmc2003 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,197
    Likes Received:
    1,533
    Perhaps we will see Ed Blanton on the right side this year.
     
  8. KleckoNamathToon

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    16
    RT - Blanton or Goodard
    RG - Clarke or AJones
    Depth - Wade Smith

    Not an inspiring group, but maybe with a 6th / 7th round project or even a trade for a 4 / 5 we can still get some help here. I'm intrigued by Clarke, if not for Moore then maybe Kendall down the road.
     
  9. BK_Jetsfan

    BK_Jetsfan New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    Guess we know why this dude never came back!

    Again, good call Cakes.

    It's funny to see immediate reactions and then what came to be. I've been searching for my reaction to the Revis pick (which wasn't as bad as the first dude, but I was disappointed like some other posters in here for the lack of picks we had in this draft), but maybe I wasn't posting actively at this point.
     
  10. tooooon

    tooooon Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    209

    I'd say this worked out
     
  11. ConcordeChops

    ConcordeChops 2018 International Poster Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    6,968
    Likes Received:
    5,367
    Is it National "bump old threads" day?
     
  12. BadgerOnLSD

    BadgerOnLSD Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    15,188
    Likes Received:
    3
    It's the doldrums of the offseason. Every day is bump old threads day.
     
  13. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    Thanks.

    I actually was in the running for Draft Guru of the Year a couple different times. Unfortunately, I have not watched enough college football the past three seasons to be able to post with conviction these days in the draft forum.

    I think many of us would agree that the Jets biggest need right now is a rush linebacker. Now who would be a good choice? I don't know. Guys like WW85, MrElectric, and GreenHurricane should have the answers.
     
  14. IrishSteveZ

    IrishSteveZ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,729
    Likes Received:
    0
    I usually hate when people bump old threads that are years old, but this was a GREAT bump!

    Good stuff!
     
  15. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    I just realized we also got DeVito as an UDFA from that draft class.
     
  16. Stanky Leg

    Stanky Leg New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    I sincerely hope they go after 2 DT's this draft. Need more push from the interior and Jenkins is most likely done, in my opinion.
     
  17. bojanglesman

    bojanglesman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    With the current CBA situation muddying the waters of free agency and the salary cap, there are going to be several GMs that make or break their reputation this year. I hope Tanny comes out on top.
     
  18. ILL-AL

    ILL-AL Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    667
    Likes Received:
    29
    Haha, Great bump!
     
  19. BakerMaker

    BakerMaker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,351
    Likes Received:
    664
    Finally a bump that I kinda look ok in afterwords.

    Sweet it was right after the original post too. :beer:
     
  20. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,375
    Likes Received:
    24,153
    Well, at least no one will be complaining about trade ups this year.
     

Share This Page