Week 3 Other Games thread

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by Yisman, Sep 19, 2012.

  1. 1968jetsfan

    1968jetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    687
    Actually this reminds me more of the Cromartie non interception against the Cowboys last season when Cro had the ball tucked in to his chest but before establishing control, aka feet down etc, Miles also grabbed the ball and it was ruled by the "professional" referees as a simultaneous catch.

    To me this is the precident, the hubub is because this happened with replacement refs.

    Now to me the two blown calls that would be legitimate arguments would be the defensive PI that led to the TD and the push off by Tate on the final play that should have been offensive PI.

    But as far as possesion, if you use the Cro/Austin catch from last year as the precident then the officials got that part of the call correct tonight.
     
  2. Zach

    Zach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    2,304
    You are CLEARLY wrong on that end. Jennings first intercepts the ball, then Tate sneaks up from underneath. Jennings hits the ground (or his ass hits the ground) and by that time, Tate cannot establish possession. Tate rips the ball out ONLY AFTER Jennings falls. (This replay was only available from in-game footage, not the replay clip from NFL.com; it becomes very clear if you watched the replay from behind the end zone.)

    It SHOULD have been an interception.
     
  3. Chrebet86

    Chrebet86 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,609
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yea ummm...no?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltNXLFmxYJI&feature=youtu.be

    Looks like ass and 2nd foot same time to me.

    At :38 seconds is when jennings has the first opportunity to have possesion...you cant see who has it more.

    The real back breaker is the 2 no call offensive pass interferences on that drive.

    1 where they call it on the D and the other is by Tate on that hail mary.
     
    #483 Chrebet86, Sep 25, 2012
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2012
  4. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    knock it down.
     
  5. NJJ_Jersey_Jets

    NJJ_Jersey_Jets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    119
    They're a bunch of pussies. I've never seen a team in any sport bitch about a call as much as this. Never.
     
  6. Chrebet86

    Chrebet86 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,609
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, could have very easily just been knocked away, Pack win.
     
  7. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,579
    How about the 2 INTs Sanchez threw against the Packers in 2010 on halloween that were similtanous poesession but given to the Packers... karma is a bitch.
     
  8. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    But to be fair, when was there ever a call this controversial/preventable/meaningful against a whole team?
     
  9. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,579
    I don't think it's the worst call in NFL history. I think Seattle got screwed in a SB because of a bunch of bad calls. They also got screwed in the Vinny game. It cost them a playoff spot.

    Tuck rule? The Chargers getting screwed by Ed Hoculi? All horrific calls that cost teams a game.
     
  10. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    I know, but what I meant was, all those other calls were just bad calls. Now with the replacement refs, there's someone for people to blame and focus their anger on and really complain about. Sure, people would blame the refs before, but always with the acknowledgement that they had the best refs out there and they were prone to make mistakes sometimes. In this case, the Packers lost a game because of a blatantly wrong call that was preventable by the NFL paying the regular refs. So it's understandable that their anger is just going to be magnified 10x more - there's never been anything like this considering the circumstances.
     
  11. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    straight out of a buffalo wild wings commercial
     
  12. Royal Tee

    Royal Tee Girls juss wanna have fun
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    21,809
    Likes Received:
    4,336
    You coulda stopped right there.
     
  13. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    The Tuck Rule was more controversial, but significantly less obvious.
     
  14. dex13

    dex13 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    technically, the tuck rule call was the correct call so its not a relevant analogy. It was a badly written rule that was reworded so it wouldn't happen again.
     
  15. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,033
    Likes Received:
    25,135
    Bahahaha go root for your other eight teams, Jall. This was justice for that game. BTW, you don't know shit about football and you never have.
     
  16. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    Ask the Lions or Jaguars how they feel about that :)

    I always thought you should just bat it out of the endzone or field.

    It wasn't conclusive evidence. It was a poorly written rule that was used in the wrong scenario.
     
  17. mute

    mute Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,113
    Likes Received:
    3,142
    :lol: surprise no one mentioned this! All he had to do was KNOCK IT DOWN.

    As for everyone else, you guys take sports WAY TOO SERIOUSLY. I mean damn, rioting... really?!
     
  18. LeonNYJ

    LeonNYJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,010
    Likes Received:
    835
    idk, GB guy had one foot down = no possession. Tate had two hands on the ball and two feet down = possession. Then GB guy got his 2nd foot down = possession. Either way, receiver possessed the ball first.
     
  19. deerow84

    deerow84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,814
    Likes Received:
    421
    That was my thought as well. No need to go for the INT there.
     
  20. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Same idea, yes
     

Share This Page