college kids take a lot of drugs and make stupid choices and sometimes sleep really late even in Iowa
Here’s something strange. Xana received a door dash delivery at 4 am. The pca, says that Bryan is seen circling the house 4 times, before finally parking to allegedly enter the home at 404am. Maybe he go there, saw the delivery, waited then went in. There is a bag in the crime scene photo with xanas name, from jack in the box. Closest jack in the box is in Pullman, 3 minutes from Bryan’s apartment. That’s a very short time(4 mins approx)between the delivery, and his entry. If it’s him, he’s one brazen mf! It was originally thought that everyone was asleep. Turns out, maybe no one was.
Very little about this case makes sense. It's easy to draw a line from point A to point B but this case goes to like point ZZZ. It's such a strange case that maybe only the defendant fits the profile of the murderer. If this is the case then the FBI did a hell of a job picking him out of the crowd of potential suspects. Note that we have not heard word one from the defendant yet and he's going to have to start talking at some point if he wants to get out of the way of the freight train the authorities have lined up.
They used her description of of the perp as part of the evidence used to arrest him. If she was so fucked up that she just went back to sleep, how credible is her testimony going to be? Fucking worthless if you ask me.
I keep going back and forth with how I think about that. 7 hours is a lot of time . Also , I’m not so sure that just peeking out the door 3 times , is normal for your roommates making noises that wake you up at 4 am. I would think you usually walk out the door, even tell people to stfu. Just looking out the door, tells me you suspected something wrong.
Yep, that's the problem the prosecutor is going to have with this witness at trial. If he asks the jury to believe her description of the killer, he's going to have to show she's a reliable witness (i.e., that her perception of the killer and her recollection of what she saw are accurate). To do that, he has to offer the jury a reasonable explanation of her bizarre behavior. Is there a reasonable explanation? If she was drunk or high, that throws her perceptions and memory into doubt. If she was stone-cold sober, that makes her behavior even weirder. I'm wondering if the defense will suggest that she was an accomplice of an unknown third party who committed these murders.
i think that there will be many more pages to the prosecutions case, maybe thousands on top of the 19 released, and that the roommate won’t end up being a huge part. There’s probably more to the story , and it will end up making sense. Bryan was seen cleaning his car in pa with surgical gloves, and then dumping trash in the neighbors cans. If he is the guy, for some reason he started covering his tracks very late in the game… perhaps only the 2 pull overs in Indiana made him paranoid.
If he's the guy he made a bunch of enormous mistakes, starting of course with murdering 4 people in cold blood.
The pundits are saying on the news that they have the “trifecta” against this bad guy -digital forensics -DNA -eyewitness testimony rare to get all 3
Yup, and it’s just the tip of the iceberg. Maybe more will be released this coming week at his next appearance
I would say 2 1/2. I'm sure this hump did it, but eye witness testimony is so wildly unreliable that unless it's an adjunct to the rest of the evidence it shouldn't be the main thing to put you away. Well, it's not in this case, so it will serve its purpose. I saw this true crime documentary recently and this guy goes the campsite was very organized and clothes were neatly folded on the picnic table (actual photos: clothes were tossed around like it was a crack den). The tent was intact (actual photos: the tent had been slashed all over the place with a hunting knife). "Those photos have to be wrong!" ^Shit like that is really scary if you're on the receiving end of someone who identifies you as perp in a violent crime and you weren't even there . . . but you can't prove your wheteabouts, either. Anyway, the guy will get due process under the law, but it's probably not as slam dunky as we're being lead to believe.
The cell towers are iffy too. They are worth more in addition to the surveillance camera footage, but alone, in such a rural area, how many towers could there be between 2 towns 7 miles apart?
Rumor alert… there’s a yt channel called truth and transparency, who is pretty good at getting info, body cam vids, etc… she has a video coming out tomorrow that claims the 2 surviving roommates, and some other friends pick Bryan out of a photo lineup, and say he drove a white car when he “would” come around. not a complete stranger maybe? Knew the layout. Didn’t go after Dylan, because she wasn’t a target? Also claims he didn’t go by Bryan when he came around. could be bs, but out of all the channels, she’s not one to risk putting out bs like others.
If both the roommates saw him that night something is very wrong here. Not sure how you could explain 2 people being coherent enough to identify the defendant but not coherent enough to call 911. One person is stretching it. The cell tower question will likely involve the tower in question covering downtown Moscow out to the residence. It's possible the phone was picked up on another tower positioned at the outskirts of town but the residence appears closest to the downtown tower. Obviously the defendant being on that downtown tower means basically nothing. If they have him on the peripheral tower the evidence there is more compelling. https://www.city-data.com/towers/cell-Moscow-Idaho.html I think if the defendant committed the crimes in question the story is going to be a bit more convoluted than what we think at this point. If he didn't obviously we're in a completely different place. Note that by "came around" the odds are very good the roommates are identifying him as at least a semi-regular at the parties or alternately in a relationship with either them or somebody else in the house.
I think only one claims to have seen him, the other was on the first floor… but I think this YouTuber is saying that he wasn’t a stranger and may have been picked in a lineup as someone who has been there before. I may have misunderstood too though
The only eyewitness we have identified (tentatively at this point) is DM, who said she could not identify the 5'10" masked male with bushy eyebrows that she saw that night. Interestingly the defendant damn near shaved his eyebrows off after he was made privy to the probable cause document.
No homicide charges filed yet, but taking an early position on the inside track for stoopidest murderer of the year - Brian Walshe. If we’ve learned anything ten days into the new year it’s that your best bet when hunting down a murderer is to focus the investigation on the nearest guy named Brian. Internet records show husband of missing Massachusetts woman searched for how to dispose of a body, sources say CNN.com Tue January 10, 2023 Investigators recently uncovered new information that turned their focus from a missing persons search to suspicions that Ana Walshe may have been killed, including her husband's internet record showing searches about dismemberment and "how to dispose of a 115-pound woman's body," according to two law enforcement sources briefed on the investigation. .
