The Mitchell Report - Partial List Of Names

Discussion in 'Baseball Forum' started by FITM, Dec 13, 2007.

  1. AlioTheFool

    AlioTheFool Spiveymaniac

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,601
    Likes Received:
    0
    For a $5-10M per year swing, I'm not going to lie, I'd do it too. Especially if I knew other guys were doing it.

    That's probably the thing I'm having the hardest time reconciling. I am totally anti-performance enhancement, but I know damn well, if it meant making another, say, $30M over the life of a contract, I would have a really hard time "Just Saying No".
     
  2. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    I would say no. Just like I wouldn't box no matter how much you pay me. My health is more important than money.
     
  3. Dierking

    Dierking Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    16,864
    Likes Received:
    16,003
    All professional athletes that play contact sports at a very competitive level sacrifice their health for money to some degree. Just the way it is.
     
  4. JoeJet

    JoeJet Banned

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,520
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rep. Tom Davis of the Government Reform Committee said today that no major league ballplayers will be called to testify before the committee. But he said "if any player feels they have been unfairly named" in the Mitchell Report, they are welcome to testify. YOUR MOVE ROGER. (Edit note: damn, those guys in Congress are smart, if Roger declines to testify, WELL, what do think?; if he testifies, he is under oath).
     
    #444 JoeJet, Dec 20, 2007
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2007

Share This Page