The media is not fair to Geno Smith

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by jetfannerd, Jan 28, 2015.

  1. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    You are the one who keeps bringing up this nonsense, so I just have to keep correcting you. Being butthurt about it won't change the fact that Geno was better.
     
  2. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    And being a ball licking Genophile won't change the fact that Carr as a ROOKIE was better than Geno as a second year QB.

    Sorry to correct you.

    Seriously Giant fan why don't you just GFY.

    _
     
    rammagen likes this.
  3. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    Except that he wasn't. He was worse.
     
  4. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    You're boring. You can suck Genos balls as much as you want.

    Carr was a better QB as a rookie than Geno was as a 2nd year player.

    The numbers speak for themselves.

    Unless you have Geno scrot clouding your mind.

    _
     
  5. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    And you are getting desperate. The numbers do indeed speak for themselves, as in 77 QB Rating for Geno and 76 for Carr.
     
  6. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Wow. Less than one point. Rookie. Second year player. That's what you're going with.

    21 YDs 12 INTs 3200 yards.

    13 TDs 13 INTs 2500 yards. Benched.

    One of those guys was better.

    If you didn't have one of their ball sacks in your mouth you'd know.

    Toolbag.

    Next.

    _
     
  7. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    The QB Rating already takes all of that into account, and was still higher for Geno, so despite your whining and 3rd grade insults, Geno was still better. :)
     
  8. pdxdrew

    pdxdrew Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    4,051
    Likes Received:
    1,535
    I have never heard Geno complain about the media. He seems pretty happy to here. I may be wrong.
     
  9. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    And unless you're a Geno ball licker there is no one else in America that thinks Geno is better than any QB in the NFL, least of all an up and coming stud like Carr. Geno sucks, we all get it and you can make all the ball sucking excuses you want.

    Derek Carr is a better QB. His rookie year blew away Geno's rookie year and his rookie year was better than Geno's second full year.

    You sound like an idiot arguing elsewise.

    _
     
  10. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    Time will show who the better QB is, but this year, Geno was better. And you sound like an idiot in general, I mean a grown man talking about licking balls on several forum pages but you don't hear me complaining about it, do ya?
     
  11. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Suggesting Geno was better than a QB throwing 21 TDs and fewer INTS is just fucking stupid and most likely you're a ball licker.

    What can I say.

    That's you.

    Carr was a better QB as a rookie than Geno as a rookie and better as a rookie than Geno as a full time albeit benched second year player.
     
  12. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    Well, far be it from me to forbid a man to express his fascination with licking balls, so keep at it. :) I will just continue correcting you on the football stuff. Geno was better than Carr in 2014, as shown by their QB Ratings, which already include all the separate stats you keep trying to shape into your flawed narrative piecemeal.
     
  13. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Hey Geno excuse making ball licking Genophile it's time for bed so if you want to continue your excuses and bullshit fantasy land, have at it.

    If fucking John Idzik had drafted Derek Carr we'd be on our way towards a SB.

    Go back to Giant fuckland you ball sucking turd.

    We missed out.

    Hopefully we get it right someday.

    _
     
  14. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    I gracefully accept your surrender... :)
     
  15. jcass10

    jcass10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,745
    Likes Received:
    2,067
    Geno earned what he received from the media.

    Best he can do is improve, cut his turnovers in half, and play more efficient red zone football.
     
  16. al_toon_88

    al_toon_88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,820
    Likes Received:
    331
    Whatever on media "fairness."

    Bottom line: Geno isn't good enough. You can't win with a turnover machine QB.

    One thing that makes teams like NE -- as much as I hate them -- and Seattle successful is their willingness to own up to mistakes and the decisiveness to quickly cut bait and move on.

    I would be willing to keep Geno on the roster for another year as a backup but that's about it.
     
  17. al_toon_88

    al_toon_88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,820
    Likes Received:
    331
    Carr is irrelevant.

    You simply cannot trot out Geno Smith under center week 1 next season if you are serious about winning.
     
  18. elgoman

    elgoman Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2014
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    44
    No, I think that any QB benefits from the a great line, exceptional weapons and extra time. Even Sanchez, who is a garbage QB, benefits from that arrangement. Accordingly Geno, who is still developing, should do well too.
     
  19. pclfan

    pclfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2013
    Messages:
    5,223
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Ok so Carr is better than Geno. Bfd that's not saying a lot. It doesn't prove a thing because Carr was unable to elevate the Raiders. I see no indication yet that Carr is going to be a franchise Qb. He looks ok and could end up a good player. If he was the Jets Qb in 2014: same thing, he couldn't do it for Oakland. He isn't taking the Raiders or anyone to the Super Bowl in the near future.
     
  20. MexicanJet

    MexicanJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,261
    Likes Received:
    333
    Car was better with Geno and he was with the RAIDERS' offense. It's actually showing a lot more. Our offense wasn't a world beater by any stretch, but just by having Decker there should give Geno an advantage. It didn't... That Dolphins game was a fluke.
     

Share This Page