Sanchez Sex w/17 year old? (17 is legal)

VictoriousSecret · Feb 8, 2011

JfaulkNYJ said: ↑

i think the guy might bitch out with the naked pics, or bedroom pics. whatever they are.
Click to expand...

barstoolsportsny had censored pics yesterday or the day before - i'm not sure if those are the ones that are in question here or if they're of her from another time.

either way, DS needs to lay off. no harm, no foul on sanchez's part.

Pluvrr · Feb 8, 2011

624 said: ↑

Yes, and you are only allowed to gamble if you are born in Las Vegas.
Click to expand...

The idiocy on these forums is absolutely amazing. Gambling is not a de facto crime because every state allows some form of gambling whether it is a lottery, bingo, or something else. Therefore gambling is a civil regulatory matter not a criminal prohibitive one. See California vs. Cabazon. Same principle applies to speed limits. It should also be pointed out that just because something is enforceable or illegal doesn't mean that it is actually enforced or prosecuted due to a number of factors including practicality. I.e. illegal immigration.

VictoriousSecret · Feb 8, 2011

Pluvrr said: ↑

The idiocy on these forums is absolutely amazing. Gambling is not a de facto crime because every state allows some form of gambling whether it is a lottery, bingo, or something else. Therefore gambling is a civil regulatory matter not a criminal prohibitive one. See California vs. Cabazon. Same principle applies to speed limits. It should also be pointed out that just because something is enforceable or illegal doesn't mean that it is actually enforced or prosecuted due to a number of factors including practicality. I.e. illegal immigration.
Click to expand...

i'm pretty sure he was joking.

fenwyr · Feb 8, 2011

Pluvrr said: ↑

The idiocy on these forums is absolutely amazing. Gambling is not a de facto crime because every state allows some form of gambling whether it is a lottery, bingo, or something else. Therefore gambling is a civil regulatory matter not a criminal prohibitive one. See California vs. Cabazon. Same principle applies to speed limits. It should also be pointed out that just because something is enforceable or illegal doesn't mean that it is actually enforced or prosecuted due to a number of factors including practicality. I.e. illegal immigration.
Click to expand...

I notice you didn't bother taking a swing at prostitution.

Are you saying I can be prosecuted in the US if I go to Amsterdam or Vancouver and smoke weed?

For a lawyer you really don't seem to understand jurisdiction. The domicile of the 'victim' and the location of the 'crime' will always take precedent over the domicile of the 'criminal'.

CatoTheElder · Feb 8, 2011

So when is Deadspin posting their huge Sanchez scandal story? It's 3:28 and I want some f*cking controversy!

IATA · Feb 8, 2011

CatoTheElder said: ↑

So when is Deadspin posting their huge Sanchez scandal story? It's 3:28 and I want some f*cking controversy!
Click to expand...

As soon as they make one up, it'll be all over the news.

IATA · Feb 8, 2011

Pluvrr said: ↑

The idiocy on these forums is absolutely amazing. Gambling is not a de facto crime because every state allows some form of gambling whether it is a lottery, bingo, or something else. Therefore gambling is a civil regulatory matter not a criminal prohibitive one. See California vs. Cabazon. Same principle applies to speed limits. It should also be pointed out that just because something is enforceable or illegal doesn't mean that it is actually enforced or prosecuted due to a number of factors including practicality. I.e. illegal immigration.
Click to expand...

If you're a lawyer, I'm a secret agent astronaut millionaire.

deathstar · Feb 8, 2011

and it's released!

http://deadspin.com/#!5755011/the-somewhat-romantic-story-of-mark-sanchez-and-a-17+year+old-girl

deathstar · Feb 8, 2011

what a fucking lame story.

he seems like a down to earth guy...his room is normal looking.

APK 8 · Feb 8, 2011

deathstar said: ↑

and it's released!

http://deadspin.com/#!5755011/the-somewhat-romantic-story-of-mark-sanchez-and-a-17+year+old-girl
Click to expand...

Site is blocked at my office. Someone please post story!

stugots · Feb 8, 2011

Incredibly lame. This isn't going anywhere

The Somewhat Romantic Story Of Mark Sanchez And A 17-Year-Old Girl

A.J. Daulerio — The Somewhat Romantic Story Of Mark Sanchez And A 17-Year-Old GirlThis is a story about a famous quarterback's courtship of a 17-year-old girl and the girl's conflicting emotions about fame. No one committed any crimes, as far as we know. It's perfectly legal for the New York Jets' Mark Sanchez to date a 17-year-old girl. He can do it in Manhattan. He can do it at his home on a North Jersey golf course. She's legal. This story has stormy nights and 2 a.m. text messages and cute photographs and mean professional gossips and very angry lawyers, which is to say it's a story about love.

The girl — the "E.K." of attorney Richard Kendall's letter to us — first reached out to writer Barry Petchesky three weeks ago. Her email:

A threatening email was sent to me from someone by the name [name redacted] who claims to be doing research for you, it regards Mark Sanchez picking up a girl in a club around new years. The tip was originally sent from a [name redacted]. If you could explain what is going on here I would greatly appreciate it because so far I am being threatened w media exposure regarding false accusations and slander.

For the record, we weren't working on any story and do not know who [name redacted] is.

E.K, fearful of the potential backlash and tabloid infamy that might ensue, decided it would be best to tell her version of the story so there would be no misunderstandings. We spoke on the phone soon after, and here's what she told me: This New Year's Eve, E.K. and some of her friends were at the Manhattan nightclub Lavo, doing whatever underage girls do at Manhattan nightclubs on New Year's Eve. As noted in this New York Post item, Sanchez made a cameo there, along with tight end Dustin Keller. He was there long enough to chat up our young protagonist. E.K. told me that Sanchez sidled up to her, and the two talked for a while. She gave him her BlackBerry number and flirted a bit. "You know I'm 17, right?" she remembers saying. Sanchez kept his cool. "Well, we can still talk, but I can't see you until you're 18," he said. "Actually," E.K. replied, "17 is legal in New York." Poise all around.

The Somewhat Romantic Story Of Mark Sanchez And A 17-Year-Old GirlNot long after, Sanchez reached out to our E.K. She, of course, went all-caps-teenybopper on Facebook when he came a-courtin'. Click the image to enlarge.

After they connected again, E.K. said Sanchez provided her and her friend with tickets to the Bills-Jets regular-season finale. Sanchez played only briefly that game but that was inconsequential to E.K. They set up a date for later that week. They had a lovely dinner at Nobu in Midtown; they talked; she was impressed, she told me several times, at how "genuine" a person the Sanchize was. "Even though," she said, "he's a really popular, good-looking quarterback."
A Big Storm, She Said

And then came the somewhat-awkward moment when I asked E.K. if she hooked up with him.

"Yeah," she said, somewhat reluctantly. "We went back to his place in Jersey after dinner. He lives on a golf course. There was a big storm."

Thundersnow, I suspect. I told her I'd make sure it's legal in Jersey for a girl her age to hook up with a 24-year-old man.

"It is. It's 16," she said. "I checked."

"He's a really nice guy, you know?" E.K. went on. Was she smitten?

"I can say that he's one of the kindest people, and he's a genuine person," she said. "I know he's a guy, whatever, like, it's not that. Not that it matters to me at all."

She paused.

"It scares me a little bit," she allowed.

Mark texted her from time to time. "He would send me a text at 2 a.m. on a Wednesday asking if I was out that night," she said, "but I'd be, like, I have school tomorrow." High school.

E.K. said she didn't want this to end up to be an Ashton Kutcher situation. I wasn't familiar with the Ashton Kutcher situation.

"You know, that girl who said all those things about an affair she had with him or whatever."

Oh.

"I don't want that image."

I asked her the last time Mark had reached out to her. She said he texted her around 2 a.m. on Jan. 24, a Monday. He'd just gotten back in town from Pittsburgh, where the Jets had lost in the AFC Championship game. He wanted to know if she was going out. She was not.
Here's Proof, She Said

Legal romances blossom all the time between young adult males and high school girls. Take Kobe Bryant and his wife, Vanessa. Or Jerry Seinfeld's romance with Shoshanna Lonstein when she was in high school. There's nothing inherently wrong with a man falling headlong into a teenage girl's arms so long as the girl and state law consent to it. That said, when you embark on a romance with a very popular quarterback, your life becomes more fraught than usual at 17. E.K. knows this. She's familiar with upper-crust New York. How to get there. How to stay there. Most people who end up in the background of a Patrick McMullan party photo do. And for a while, she was OK with her story getting out. She just didn't want to be the one talking about it. She didn't want to jeopardize her budding relationship with Mark. Her biggest concern, it seemed, was what photograph we might use. She didn't want us to use the one you see up top, the one in which she's smoking a cigarette. It'd look bad, E.K. felt.

In any case, we were moving forward. She emailed us to say she was torn, but to let her know if we were running a story and to please keep her out of it.

I was still skeptical. Was it possible for her to share some of the text messages she exchanged with Mark? Or was there any way she could prove her tale outside of her Facebook status?

She sent along a cell phone number with a 923 area code — Southern California. She claimed that was the one from which Mark would BBM her. (We tried it. No one picked up.)

Then, she sent along this message:

Proof?

The Somewhat Romantic Story Of Mark Sanchez And A 17-Year-Old GirlThe Somewhat Romantic Story Of Mark Sanchez And A 17-Year-Old GirlThe Somewhat Romantic Story Of Mark Sanchez And A 17-Year-Old Girl

Well, maybe she knows his maid?

At this point, E.K. was OK with the story, just so long as it was clear it didn't come from her. That would be bad for her and bad for the Jets and bad for Mark and bad for the rest of her life.

Why? She wrote:

Well I'm still "close" w mark and he knows about you so jets pr was like here how's you handle it, I don't want to betray him but I don't want to let him play me like this, if this comes out like I technically sold this then I can risk any jobs or college in the future. They may not want me if I "sold" the story. So publish what you no and ill just be like it was a deceitful friend of mine. You no? So my future isn't ruined but mark doesn't get everything. He is a genuine person but not necessarily good to women. You know?

And then again:

I just am in contact 24/7 w the jets and mark so I can't officially betray them, but you know?

She didn't sell us the story. We never offered to buy it. We wanted to hear her side of it because, well, it's kind of fascinating to know how romance blossoms just this side of the law. I wanted to talk to E.K. again, to find out more information and to see what the status of her relationship with Mark Sanchez was before we published anything.
I'll Sue, She Said

Late last week, however, she turned:

E.K.: "There's no story, if you print about me I'm 17 ill sue"

Me: "Sue for what?"

E.K.: "Someone has my email, I don't know what messages you have received but I have no part in those, I'm 100% against this. Go away."

E.K.: "You can't print my name, I'm under 18, you need consent"

Me:

[Name redacted], you're making this stuff up now.

And, no, we won't use your name. But this is a story, and this is a bigger problem than you think it is. The bottom line is, you talked to me, you talked to me on the record. You then went back on that. Then you went back on again but told me to say a "friend betrayed you". If you want to go through the entire process of where the legal lines are here, I'd be more than happy to go over them with you. But the reality is, this is a story.

Like I said, we don't have to use your name. But this story is going to run. I'd like more cooperation from you but it's not going to change the fact that this story is in the process of being done.

I'm not trying to ruin your life, I'm trying to do my job. If you'd been a little more upfront with me from the get-go, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Instead, we've had several which were ones that I told you I was going to use for this story.

Just think about it. I'll let you know where we are on Monday, but this is running on Tuesday.

The next person I heard from, a few hours later, was Richard Kendall, that nice attorney from California, concerned on behalf of his client from Connecticut about the story we were running about her night out in New York. Kendall, proud USC Trojan (Gould School of Law, class of '79), believes that our publishing a story about a legal relationship would both be defamatory and constitute an "unlawful publication of private facts," even though his client, E.K., had given us her explicit cooperation several times. It's kind of odd. But then, so is love. You know?
Click to expand...

ScotsJet · Feb 8, 2011

There is nothing bad for Mark in this at all.

Pete Carroll · Feb 8, 2011

Well, we can still talk, but I can't see you until you're 18," he said.
So i respect him more now

JfaulkNYJ · Feb 8, 2011

Pete Carroll said: ↑

Well, we can still talk, but I can't see you until you're 18," he said.
So i respect him more now
Click to expand...

let's be honest. sanchez prob banged the hell out of her.

Pete Carroll · Feb 8, 2011

JfaulkNYJ said: ↑

let's be honest. sanchez prob banged the hell out of her.
Click to expand...

Probably, his brother is a lawyer if it matters

IATA · Feb 8, 2011

Wow, what a joke. Deadspin fails.

JfaulkNYJ · Feb 8, 2011

for people who cant view the site here are the pictures the whore sent.

total fuckin fail.

TheBlairThomasFumble · Feb 8, 2011

Utterly fucking lame. That's it?

Here's the reference to the Patrick McMullan photos:

http://www.google.com/images?q=Eliz...8&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=974&bih=522

deathstar · Feb 8, 2011

now everyone knows shes a whore...

and nothing will happen to sanchez.

what a moron she is for talking to deadspin.

James Calvin · Feb 8, 2011

Just reported on Fox news: Sanchez attempts to make an anchor baby.

Waiting for Glenn Beck to diagram the plot on the chalkboard.

Sanchez Sex w/17 year old? (17 is legal)

VictoriousSecret New Member

Pluvrr Active Member

VictoriousSecret New Member

fenwyr Active Member

CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

IATA Trolls

IATA Trolls

deathstar Well-Known Member

deathstar Well-Known Member

APK 8 Well-Known Member

stugots Member

ScotsJet Active Member

Pete Carroll New Member

JfaulkNYJ New Member

Pete Carroll New Member

IATA Trolls

JfaulkNYJ New Member

TheBlairThomasFumble Active Member

deathstar Well-Known Member

James Calvin Banned

Share This Page

Useful Searches

Sanchez Sex w/17 year old? (17 is legal)

VictoriousSecret New Member

Pluvrr Active Member

VictoriousSecret New Member

fenwyr Active Member

CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

IATA Trolls

IATA Trolls

deathstar Well-Known Member

deathstar Well-Known Member

APK 8 Well-Known Member

stugots Member

ScotsJet Active Member

Pete Carroll New Member

JfaulkNYJ New Member

Pete Carroll New Member

IATA Trolls

JfaulkNYJ New Member

TheBlairThomasFumble Active Member

deathstar Well-Known Member

James Calvin Banned

Share This Page