One thing that I think people underrate is that Sanchez has never been in an system that plays to his strengths. Just a couple that have tried to mask his weaknesses. I don't know where/how to look at the stats but from my memory Sanchez has always been really solid on the roll-out passing. It allows him to use his mobility and accuracy on the run. This also helped him limit the reads he needed to make in certain situations. Yet we saw very few of these types of designed plays. More often then not Mark ended up out there while running for his life when playing with Shottys system. ( and at this point I'm not convinced Tony S actually had a system in place throughout the year so we won't count that ). I really think moving to a WCO is going to help Sanchez immensely. If he's not already FUBAR he might be poised for a breakout season and surprise people.
While I agree Tomlinson wasn't the back he used to be he was invaluable to Sanchez as a outlet, He always seemed to be in the right place for Sanchez to dump it to and was able to make a few yards afterwards turning would be forced passes or fumbles into chunk gains. We needed a cerebral back like this to really help Mark last year and we didn't have it. In his rookie year that player was T-Rich, 2010 it was Tomlinson, 2011 we don't have the Talent to include our Rbs in the passing game. Really hoping one of our backs can step up this year in the passing game, Someones going to need to in the WCO.
I didn't say he didn't help, he absolutely helped but he wasn't some savior. he was not LT 2006, he was great the first month then pretty mediocre/below average the rest of the year running the ball.
Haha, it's funny how you use "Average fans", as if stating your opinion backed up with no facts (or selective ones) makes you an expert. If you think the Jets weren't loaded on offense except their scrub QB in 2010 you're on crack.
Mark Sanchez 2010: 3291 Yards 17 Touchdowns 13 Interceptions 9 fumbles 1 fumble lost. Never forget the year Sanchez managed to post more pass TD's that turnovers due to a fluky amount of his fumbles recovered by the Jets.
I discuss facts, I don't throw out random #s w/o context. If you think we were "loaded" you have no idea what game you are watching. We had good WRs, a good TE, decent RBs, a good OL. Nothing special w/ any unit this is what you do best, post #s w/o context. Some day you may begin to understand this game.
2312 Yards 16 touchdowns 6 interceptions 58% completion percentage 10 wins Mark was very good in the wins not so good in the losses that is why the love and hate of Sanchez.
The love? There are like 9 people on earth who love Sanchez, and that's including his parents. Everyone else realizes he blows.
Going on a limb there eh? We usually only get insight like this from our elected officials, not on a message board- what a treat!
Here are five games we won that year which he sucked in: MIN 191 yards (on 44 attempts!) 0 int 0 TD DEN 198 yards 1 TD 2 int CIN 166 yards 1 TD 1 int PIT 170 yards 0 tds 0 ints IND (Wild Card) 189 yards 0 TDs 1 int
:rofl2: just showing how little you know. You know the Minny game was played in a monsoon for about half of it, right? yet he didn't turn it over and helped us to a big lead before the D blew it. at den saw his first struggles since week 1 but he made plays and on 4th down trailing by 3 he scrambled then gave Holmes a chance to catch a deep ball which resulted in the PI and TD to win it. He stunk vs. Cincy he was OUTSTANDING at Pittsburgh. I recently watched this game as they replayed it on NFL network and he was OUTSTANDING but the statsheet won't tell you that so I understand why you think the way that you do. He struggled in the first half at Indy but was great in the 2nd half including leading a GAME WINNING drive at the gun on the road in the playoffs. You should watch more football instead of collecting meaningless fantasy #s. from the Minny game.
Not that I'm agreeing with anyone here but how come people always have to resort to personal attacks when they get out debated? That Pitt game was exciting though, Braylon had 8 big time catches and we kept moving the chains on 3rd down. Sanchez kept alot of drives alive one that led to that awesome scramble for the TD.
No, it's just that you're plain retarded/trolling and not worth responding to seriously at this point. You basically offered up that it rained in one game, which is why Mark was bad in the 5 wins (and lets not even talk about the losses). You're whole argument is "OMG I WATCHED THOSE GAMES HE WAS GOOOOOD" Which is not fact, it's an opinion and a misinformed one.
