NFL Draft 2010: Day 2 Round 2-3 Discussion 6P.M. EST.

Discussion in 'Draft' started by JfaulkNYJ, Apr 23, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ToonWalker

    ToonWalker New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,775
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gronkowski on the phone....for NE?
     
  2. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,070
    Likes Received:
    25,185
  3. 1968jetsfan

    1968jetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    687
    What i can't believe is 2 or 3 DT's have gone this round and Cody is still on the board, I think Troup was a big reach
     
  4. legler82

    legler82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,443
    Likes Received:
    7,394
    Gronkowski would be a good pick by NE
     
  5. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, we figured he'd head to NE. At least they had to jump for him.
     
  6. nyjetsrule

    nyjetsrule Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    10,379
    Likes Received:
    7
    NE moves up for a tight end. good news to us jets fans for sure.
     
  7. CatoTheElder

    CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    15,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    OK, this is crazy.
     
  8. GQMartin

    GQMartin Go 'Cuse

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    12,689
    Likes Received:
    5,327
    Yeah. They didn't have a pick when time expired. The draft kept going.
     
  9. legler82

    legler82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,443
    Likes Received:
    7,394
    Mass confusion for Gronkowski.
     
  10. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    Pats jumped in front of the Ravens, this has to be for a WR or 3-4 DE (Tate or Joseph I'd guess).
     
  11. Mehl-56

    Mehl-56 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,474
    Likes Received:
    244
    NE traded up, in front of Baltimore
     
  12. CatoTheElder

    CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    15,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    Called it.(sort of)
     
  13. 1968jetsfan

    1968jetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    687
    I'd drop S behind OLB, but in this round I think BPA DL OL or OLB, don't care for what order, just BPA of those positions.
     
  14. Kris 15

    Kris 15 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    16,735
    Likes Received:
    1,499
    No problem with the Pats trading up, especially for an offensive player.

    Assuming that the Pats in fact are the trade partners. :lol:
     
  15. Mehl-56

    Mehl-56 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,474
    Likes Received:
    244
    TE Arizona...
     
  16. Jam.

    Jam. Banned

    Joined:
    May 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    well, at least they had to move up.
     
  17. Matty Jets

    Matty Jets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,620
    Likes Received:
    131
    Mass confusion.
     
  18. dthomas53

    dthomas53 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who cares, a mediocre TE prospect. He's got potential, but nothing that worries me.

    :pats_suck:
     
  19. Mehl-56

    Mehl-56 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,474
    Likes Received:
    244
    WTF... Al Davis fux up the draft!
     
  20. ToonWalker

    ToonWalker New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,775
    Likes Received:
    0
    Meanwhile, Kiper still babbling about Troup.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page