Jets agree with T George Fant

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Mogriffjr, Mar 16, 2020.

  1. Pepsiguy5

    Pepsiguy5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2017
    Messages:
    2,331
    Likes Received:
    2,927
    I'm going to make the optimistic prediction that this will work out better for the Jets than Osemele, and Kalil did. It might be a little bit of outside the box thinking but I like it. At least its effort towards helping the OL and this guy looks like he might be able to help in multiple roles (both tackle spots and quality backup as well as perhaps some special packages) while also providing the outside chance he'll seize the opportunity and come into his own as a quality NFL starter.

    Shit... compared to what we were looking at last year welcome aboard.
     
  2. chandler

    chandler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,100
    Likes Received:
    1,398
    exactly. this guy has a much better chance of outperforming his contract than does COnklin. Plus he has a better chance to improve his game during this contract. Makes no sense to sign a guy at his peak only to see and pay for his decline with guaranteed money etc
     
    NCJetsfan and IIMeanDeanII like this.
  3. egelband

    egelband Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    256
    Ele-Fant. No? Sorry.
     
  4. HomeoftheJets

    HomeoftheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2016
    Messages:
    15,543
    Likes Received:
    22,936
    Conklin is 25 years old, Fant is 27. And value doesn't mean much if Darnold is knocked out.
     
    BacktoQueens and TonyFtLaud like this.
  5. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    You say that like Conklin is a great pass blocker. He’s never been a strong pass blocker. He’s know as a very good people mover in the run game and average pass blocker. He gave up 4 sacks last year, just because he was the biggest name on the market does not make him great.
     
  6. HomeoftheJets

    HomeoftheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2016
    Messages:
    15,543
    Likes Received:
    22,936
    He may not be a great pass blocker, but he's still a much better pass blocker than Fant.
     
    TonyFtLaud and 94Abraham like this.
  7. J-Raw24

    J-Raw24 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2019
    Messages:
    1,884
    Likes Received:
    1,516
    Fant allowed 2 sacks in 2019 and 1 penalty. He played 462 snaps. In 2018 he allowed 2 sack and had 5 penalties about the same snaps. In 2018 5 sacks 6 penalties and started 10 games way more snaps and was a rookie. He has potential. He is a way better pass blocker than Conklin.
     
  8. dawinner127

    dawinner127 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    12,076
    Likes Received:
    12,697
    I think it's fair to say majority of the board overreacted when we signed this guy because 1) everyone was disappointed after not getting Glasgow, Thuney, or Conklin 2) no one even knew who the hell this guy was and his PFF rating was awful

    The guy has potential. He's super athletic and has long arms and fits quite well with what Gase wants to do on the offensive side of the ball. I think it's actually a decent deal with huge upside.
     
  9. Falco21

    Falco21 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    13,631
    Likes Received:
    10,895
    Virtually no one on this board knew who George Fant was prior to this move.

    Given that fact, I consider all of the reactions bullshit and centered around notoriety, rather than talent and potential.

    I know nothing about him and I trust Douglas does. If he sees potential and talent in him, then I am all for the signing.
     
    IIMeanDeanII, Br4d, Ralebird and 6 others like this.
  10. GasedAndConfused

    GasedAndConfused Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2015
    Messages:
    14,203
    Likes Received:
    10,165
    this^ outside of the top pro bowl lineman nobody outside the NFL really knows much about other teams o-line players at all. I'm just happy an attempt is being made to address the o-line right now but still want a LT with our 1st rounder. it's too good of a draft for o-line not to take one
     
    Imagesrdecieving likes this.
  11. Imagesrdecieving

    Imagesrdecieving Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    902
    Agreed. In other drafts Andrew Thomas would be a consensus top LT prospect and I hope that Joe Douglas keeps that in mind.

    Unless all 4 are drafted ahead of us it should be a no-brainer who we pick.

    I get the excitement for either Lamb/Jeudy but a combo of big 4/2nd round WR seems a lot more valuable than top WR/2nd round tackle

    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
     
  12. Falco21

    Falco21 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    13,631
    Likes Received:
    10,895
    I think drafting a lineman with our 11th pick is not a necessity. There is a lot of talent that can be found later in the draft. I think with the amount of talent at WR in this draft, we have to take one at #11.

    Below are the top 10 guards and top 10 tackles in the NFL last year. Half are from outside of the 1st round, which means there is a ton of value outside of round 1:

    Tackles

    David Bakhtiari - 4th Round
    Mitchell Schwartz - 2nd Round
    Andrew Whitworth - 2nd Round

    Ryan Ramczyk - 1st Round
    Terron Armstead - 3rd Round
    Lane Johnson - 1st Round
    Tyron Smith - 1st Round
    Joe Staley - 1st Round
    Taylor Lewan - 1st Round
    Jason Peters - Undrafted

    Guards

    Zack Martin - 1st Round
    David DeCastro - 1st Round
    Quenton Nelson - 1st Round
    Brandon Scherff - 1st Round
    Kevin Zeitler - 1st Round
    Marshal Yanda - 3rd Round
    Joe Thuney - 3rd Round
    Brandon Brooks - 3rd Round
    Rodger Saffold - 2nd Round
    Shaq Mason - 4th Round
     
    NCJetsfan likes this.
  13. DefenseWinsChampionships

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2016
    Messages:
    5,393
    Likes Received:
    4,238
     
  14. LAJet

    LAJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    9,266
    Likes Received:
    12,417
    I will be the first to admit I didn't know Fant from apple. But I find it fascinating that a few here that just yesterday didn't know much of him either now are going on record as Fant experts to state that he will get Darnold killed because he is nothing but a situational player. Never mind the fact that a) we don't even know what JD real plan for him is 2) before his injury he was slated to start for the Seahawks, so there was potential there, 3) has show versatility and athleticism and the flexibility to play multiple roles across the line far better than some of our current players which we so desperately need 4) Conklin while a very good RT was not and would not have been effective at LT and he is not the QB savior against the pass we are now making him out to be, and 5) Gives JD more ammunition going into the draft and remaining free agency without braking the bank on one player. IMO We got two significant upgrades at about the same value as Conklin and if Fant proves out at LT a real steal. I applaud JD for not getting into a bidders war and overpay for the position. We have now made three moves all centered around the OL so clearly JD has his focus in the right place and was not immediately BS into a high paid free agent in a very limited market. I'm happy we are no longer the trading suckers that bend over in desperation and even bring in damaged goods like Osemele with zero value to this team.
    On to the next free agent. Let Miami, Cleveland and the like be the winners of free agency. I want this team to start filling as many holes as possible to allow for the most flexibility in the draft.
     
  15. Zach

    Zach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    9,481
    Likes Received:
    2,299
  16. GasedAndConfused

    GasedAndConfused Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2015
    Messages:
    14,203
    Likes Received:
    10,165
    yeah there are easily 4 lineman all worth a top 11 pick. no way should we pass on one. WRs are too risky. so many "can't miss WRs" fail. i'd rather use one of our 3rd rounder or even both to grab a WR since we won't need a C anymore anyway.
     
  17. GasedAndConfused

    GasedAndConfused Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2015
    Messages:
    14,203
    Likes Received:
    10,165
    been there, dont that, got the t-shirt. You have a way better chance finding a great WR outside of the 1st then you do a LT. Take off the guards as well I wouldn't use a 1st on any of the one's this year but there are 3-4 top 10 OT prospects in the draft this year which is rare. passing on one would be dumb
     
    Imagesrdecieving likes this.
  18. NCJetsfan

    NCJetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages:
    36,684
    Likes Received:
    30,193
    There are also two potential HOF WRs who are arguably better already at their positions than any of the 4 OTs are, who still have just as high ceilings as those OTs, and passing on one of those WRs for a good OT (none of whom is a can't miss prospect) can easily be considered dumb.
     
  19. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    who’s arguing that ... because I’ve not seen anyone arguing that anywhere. Calling anyone in this class “potential hall of fame” is either willful ignorance or reading way too many hype articles. This is a very good and deep class, but few are claiming there are multiple generational type talents. There are 2 or 3 wideouts with #1 type potential, there are 4 OTs with starting LT type potential. No one is claiming any of them are gall of fame types. Given positional value, the OTs are far ahead of the WRs in draft value for the jets. Quit talking out your ass.
     
    TonyFtLaud and BacktoQueens like this.
  20. IIMeanDeanII

    IIMeanDeanII Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    6,645
    Likes Received:
    7,146
    It doesn't matter as long as JD hits.

    He has had a very solid FA so far and has made this roster look a lot better already. IMO

    Personally though, I would go OT at 11. Just based on need and depth.

    WR is absolutely stacked and we can get one or two quality WR in the 2nd and 3rd round. It's rare for a draft to he this deep at a position. Usually you have one or two positions with good depth. This year, WR is historically stacked.

    I would literally lose my mind if we don't draft one or two in this draft. You have to.
     
    Imagesrdecieving likes this.

Share This Page