Welker also wasn't healthy prior to this game..he was a late scratch I believe. So who knows if he would have had better numbers then his replacement
Hah! It's pretty easy to deal those cards. Here goes: "The NYJ would have won the Super Bowl in 1999, but Vinny Testaverde was out all season." Did I do that right?
So, the reasons the Pats lost: The refs and the league conspired against them; Welker was out; Al Davis conned them into trading Seymour; Mayo was out; The Mayan calendar predicted this as a precourser to 2012. Am I missing anything?
honestly, you pats fans are pathetic - take the loss like a man and stop making excuses, edelman burned us today, get over yourselves - everyone has injuries, and the refs gave you 6 points too
I don't get whats so hard about realizing theres a middle ground "welker wouldnt have made a difference"=false "pats would have won if welker had been healthy"=false see how that works?
JG"let me get this straight, you want me to run out and throw a perfect pass, and I drop it and stand there with my hands on my hips looking stupid" TB "No, i'm going to over or underthrow you and get my pouty puss face out on the sideline"
Regardless of who Scoffaveli cheers for..... Injuries are not the reason the NYJ won today, just like injuries weren't the reason the NYJ won @NE last season. But I digress.
Bullspit. By then both teams may have other key injuries. What will be the story then? This is football. BTW, screw homefield, we have more wins against them on their turf than ours since 2001.