When you said Brick should be the only one to talk on the Jets, I think that it should really only be Brick, Harris, Revis, Mangold, and Moore. Basically only players who can back up their talk with play should be talking, but knowing the NY Media it will never happen.
My biggest fear for this whole endeavor is that the Jets management will get too smitten with the TebowCat like they do with every gimmick they think up and they'll overuse Tebow without adequate compensation in production. Still I think to say that you think Tebow should be used "0-3" snaps a game is pretty laughable. He should be used 3 snaps at the very minimum and I don't think I'd mind seeing him as much as 10-15 times if he has been particularly effective in games that you're looking to control more clock for strategic reasons. Still, I think by fair the main point here is that if they're overusing Tebow in that kind of manner it's clear that Tebow can't be that big of a drop off when he's in compared to Sanchez OR Sanchez isn't doing as well as we would hope when he's in. Either way the drop off in production only hits in the range of plays that occur above and beyond his optimal usage. Losing 10% of production on 7 plays a game is hardly enough to sway a season. Might not even sway the result of a single game. Shit we lost 40% in production EVERY SINGLE PLAY of offense we had last year by starting WAYNE HUNTER and VLAD DUCASSE at RIGHT TACKLE with NO HELP. EVERY SNAP. Still we were a .500 team (really we were better but injury riddled Sanchez surely cost us a game or three down the stretch.) It's just not that big of a deal. I think that arguments about hampering Sanchez's long term development are pretty much fluff at this point. It's his fourth year. The kid has put up with Schotty. Plax. Mason. Revolving chorus of receivers. Wayne Hunter. New York media. Shitty wildcats. If he's still here living to tell the tale, I don't think that riding the bench for 10% more of snaps than he ideally should be for one year is going to ruin his career.