DRob to Broncos for conditional pick(s) in '09

So yeah, basically Jets fans, you guys better root that Vilma and Robertson have monster seasons

 

I smell a trade up for Tebow.

 

I smell Tim Tebow staying for his senior year.

 

No doubt.

I'm gald to get the contract off the books and if Vilma and D-rob play well we get a very nice return in '09.

Good job by the FO on this one.

 

8 sacks for D'Rob next year in Denver....unlike Vaginaham, Robertson played hurt, never bitched, and when he was in the right defense with a real tackle next to him, he was highly productive.

You will never convince me that changing to a 3-4 and neutralizing 2 1st round draft picks in Vilma and Robertson was the right move.

Mangini won't be satisfied until every player on the roster is one he brought in.

 

It's HIS team. He can bring in, keep, and get rid of whoever he wants.

 

He does seem like the type.

 

i would have like to have gotten a draft pick for this year, but happy to save that 11 million cap hit

 

Yea but his idiot decision to change the scheme ruined a dominant 4-3 D.

 

looks like pic next yr is what we get

 

When did we have a "dominant" 4-3 D? I must have missed it.

 

think and hope it was sarcasm

 

Mmmm...Vaginaham

 

How can we find out what the terms are of the conditional 2009 pick?

What are the thresholds for which the pick gets better?

I saw some article saying the Jets get nothing if DRob does not make it out of Broncos training camp. I also saw articles saying the pick probably would be a 3rd rounder if he plays all season. Another post in this thread said the pick could be as high as a 2nd rounder. Most articles say it is a mid-round conditional pick.

Can anyone find out the exact terms?

 

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

 

Um the dominant one that stopped existing after our idiot HC changed the scheme. Once he did that, we lost two of the most dominating 4-3 players in the league in DRob and Vilma, who dominated.

You guys have such short memories. Stop smoking the potz.

 

whoa....you know why mangini changed our so called "domiant" 4-3 defense to a 3-4.....its because thats all he knows....he grew up in that system...stop bitchin...

thats like makin a spanish teacher teach math

 

vilma was a monster in the 4-3....drob was on the rise but he was definitely not consistantly dominate

 

I'm pretty sure you're just trying to be a dick by using "dominate" so much in your post. Either that or you just want to be me, which is understandable.

I hope you're being sarcastic with these posts, but if not, there's a guy named Run n' Gun somewhere on this board - go find him, you'll find that you have so much in common.

 

Based on previous posts from you, I'll take this as sarcasm. If you are being serious.....well I hope you're not.