Devante Adams

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by BrowningNagle, Oct 1, 2024 at 4:52 PM.

  1. Not Sure

    Not Sure Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2022
    Messages:
    202
    Likes Received:
    171
    Nobody wants Reddick.

    He's over thirty, is holding out, wants a huge retirement paycheck, and isn't even really that special to begin with. He's way over-rating his market value. Guys like that are GM killahs.

    It's not like he's Julius Peppers or some shit. Why would Tom Telesco and the Raiders, of all teams, want him?
     
  2. dawinner127

    dawinner127 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    11,838
    Likes Received:
    12,348
    [​IMG]
    Great post by Joe Caporoso IMO. I agree with basically everything
     
    REVISion likes this.
  3. GQMartin

    GQMartin Go 'Cuse

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    12,525
    Likes Received:
    5,102
    Yep.
     
  4. Kronoking

    Kronoking Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2023
    Messages:
    610
    Likes Received:
    408
    Or framing that all in another way that doesn't just cherry pick on people's in the moment feelings on the matter - in typical bad team philosophy and logic we obviously just need to triple down on a losing bet instead of potentially cutting our latter loses. Latter loses that people, always in that moment mind you, love to claim they "don't care about". But when the time actually comes they damn sure always do.

    Like i alluded to on the first page of this thread this concept idea that you can just add Danante into the current offense, and expect that to fix the fundamental issue at hand, is basically just catering to the willingly naive and/or stupid. It didn't essentially work before with adding a much bigger upgrade at QB, and it's not going to work now at WR. I'm ultimately not against trading for Davante, but let's be crystal clear honest with the surrounding reality on this. There should be no cheer for Woody, the FO or Rodgers at the end of this if it happens. As this trade has a lot more to do with throwing up the hail mary in the attempt to justify Nathaniel Hackett's job and existence here then it does with any genuine attempt to make this offense a meaningful amount better. There is only one way that latter is actually happening and it absolutely has to start with a firing. There is no shortcut around that.

    We need a competent offensive coach in that room more then we need anything else (including Aaron Rodgers himself).
     
  5. AndyDrums

    AndyDrums Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2020
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    613
    Go get someone who can block for AR. Go get someone who can rush the passer. Adams is a band aid on a gunshot wound. The CS is terrible and dumbo Hackett won't know how to use Adams anyway,

    This franchise is a train wreck.
     
  6. REVISion

    REVISion Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    5,184
    Likes Received:
    8,921
    I think most people understand that acquiring Adams doesn't fix the Hackett problem, but it objectively does improve our chances of making a playoff run this year. WRs are extremely important and Rodgers/Wilson haven't been on the same page all season. There are multiple times each game where it looks like Wilson pretty clearly didn't run the right route.

    Teams that have the potential to make playoff runs mortgage the future to maximize the present all the time. It's a pretty established strategy with some merit.
     
    dawinner127 likes this.

Share This Page