#4 for #9 and 22?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by TheCoolerGlennFoley, Apr 19, 2006.

  1. hydro51

    hydro51 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,603
    Likes Received:
    0
    sf has just as many needs as us.. there arent gonna trade up.
     
  2. MobiusOne28

    MobiusOne28 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    If Hawk slips by Green Bay, then GB is retarded for not taking him. However, I would in no way oppose us taking him if he slips and then going o-line with 29 (we should at least get 1 OL in those 3 picks IMO).
     
  3. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    6 - Ngata
    22 - Dawson
    29 - Mangold

    or

    6 - Hawk
    22 - Watson
    29 - Mangold

    Sure up the center of BOTH lines for the next 7-10 years and get our OLB pass rusher all in the 1st round. Take the best remaining RT in the 3rd round.
     
    #23 fenwyr, Apr 19, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2005
  4. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    Would be nice, we can get a better franchise RB at #22 than #29, maybe williams will be around.
     
  5. MobiusOne28

    MobiusOne28 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    I knew you were gonna chime in at some point, RobA :grin:
     
  6. hydro51

    hydro51 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,603
    Likes Received:
    0
    were almost gona have our choice.. D williams may actaully slide now denver was considering RB at #22.. now with them off the boardand probably gonna take chad jackson @15.. if not all 4 i think 3 of them (maroney,white,Addai) but williams could slide now too and be ther at #29.
     
    #26 hydro51, Apr 19, 2006
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2006

Share This Page