I think you can get Levis for a lot less than that. I’m not a fan personally though. Levis is so stiff and made some awful decisions with the football when he got his chance.
In this entre conversation you had mostly with yourself you never said anything concrete that might work. I initially thought you meant drafting a QB high every year, maybe even trading up for the guy you like, etc... An example would be drafting Simpson this year AND then spend a top 5 pick (or package multiple assets to move up) next year, and if out of the two one doesn't clearly emerge, another 1st round pick the year after, until you are confident you have a young FQB. That to me was not practical, but at least it was an idea worth discussing. Instead were you arrived after this internal debate is getting "viable" QBs every year. When asked to clarify, you said to look in the dictionary, which says "capable of working successfully; feasible". Which is exactly what we have been doing: the coaches are getting what they think are capable QBs, with Rodgers, Fields, Tyrod, and Geno being latest examples. You have provided no nuance, no refinement when asked again and again, just a stock dictionary answer. Basically, your novel idea is: get capable QBs - with no clarification whatsoever. Why couldn't anyone else think of this genus plan? All we have to do is get viable QBs, and we are set! How to find viable QBs, what look for, well dictionary of course that's where the answer is. Come on, RB, yes, I am making fun of this, but that's actually what you are saying.
