I remember the Vick years, how the NFC South had the teams having each other number. Tampa Bay owned Atlanta, but Atlanta owned another team, etc. So they're talking about the Bucs having success against Vick, and one of the guys said "it's because we were aggressive. we didn't spy, sit back, etc." They show an example of a play where the Bucs handled Vick, and... ...of course they had Derrick Brooks spying.
I like the CHiefs personnel and coaching staff better, so that's why I felt the Chiefs would go at least 8-8 and the Raiders would still lose at least 10 games.
I believe it is an homage to end zone art of the 1960s. Several teams had end zone art like that back in the day. The Chargers and Broncos were two such teams. I personally think that look is great. It's high atop my favorite end zone art list. The best (and also most elaborate) end zone art I ever saw was that of the Cardinals when they hosted the Cowboys in 1998. I also liked the Giants end zone art of the 1960s when they had a huge "NY" in the middle of their end zones which covered the entire 10 yards on the end zones. I found a photo of that Arizona end zone. The photo is not much as you can only see a portion of the end zone. It was great, though. The whole entire end zone was painted. The Cardinals only did it for that one game.
unique play with the helmet rule nullifying sd first down tolbert had his helmet pop off behind the line on 3rd and inches he ended up leaning forward and getting it, but play ruled dead at spot he lost his helmet
oakland first and goal after a muffed punt for arizona right after the muff, a completion to zach miller set oakland up at the 7
How the fuk are they not calling false starts on the COLTS??? The Center keeps bobbing his head every time Manning says hut...wtf!?
