Separate names with a comma.
Thanks for this! I'd be thrilled if it turns out this way: a stud OT AND a 2nd round pick.
Douglas is a borderline case for me. He's had 6 years (or will have after this year), and we still have major holes at QB (I don't count Rodgers...
Best post of the year, even as a Zach Wilson believer, you nailed it! The next QB the Jets find and develop (or just don't ruin) will be the...
My guess? If Douglas can trade up to get Alt he'll do it. If he can't he'll try to line up a trade back a few spots looking to snag a good OT or...
After reading your analysis of Odunze, I'd definitely be against trading up for him. For Alt? Absolutely!
Yeah, that's where having VP of Football Ops has merit, especially if that guy has deep experience in all facets of football, including coaching,...
I certainly agree with your second sentence! It's astounding and maddening that they've failed at this for decades! We'd all love for them to...
Sorry, I gotta question your rating system.
It's about the best that could happen for both parties. The Jets get rid of a problem, Zach gets to play close to home for a HC that knows...
If...IF...you nail the pick you trade up for it makes a lot of sense. But that's a big "if", especially with Douglas. That said, trading up to...
Don't make the simple thing complicated - take the OT you think can help us this year, or failing that, trade back and get that missing 2nd...
Of course it's all speculation and "click bait" at this point, but I hope the part about the Jets leaning towards OL at #10 is true. On a...
In a broad sense, yes, I agree, I want OT and nothing else. That said, none of us have the info that Douglas has and there may be "flags" that...
Now if only he were the HC/DC...
We need - and have for years - an answer at LT that will fill that spot for 10+ years. Every GM since Tanny has neglected filling that gaping...
There's a deeply comprehensive Draft Guide put out by Dane Brugler on The Athletic covering 1900 prospects and background on all of them. If you...
Your reading comprehension is flawed, or you're just being obtuse. Here's what I said: "ANY player taken at #10 is presumably a "stud", and ANY...
Where do you get that interpretation of what I said? Jeezus! Color what others say just so you can make your argument stronger at all costs. I...
No, we're talking about taking a stud T at #10 who could be an emergency starter if one of the two older, Tackles with injury histories goes down...
While they may not be "perfectly ready to step in and provide starting caliber play", is that the criteria you use to measure a backup or a...
