Will jolly start over baker or will baker start over Jolley i dont get it. It didnt make much sense to sign baker again. any ideas
Baker is a better blocker than Jolley, so we will nedd that help with the line, I know that pass catching will be important but right now RT and LT look like turnstiles
I would take Baker over Jolley. Baker's got some upside. He could be a solid player. Jolley's just too inconsistent. Dressen should get some playing time.
I have no idea why they resigned Baker. Jolley and Baker both suck they need to get a TE with there #35 pick. I would rather have a new guy that may be good then two old guys (not meaning old in age) that we know can't play worth a sh*t.
Baker is a very talented pass catching and as someone said in another thread he would have been a top 10-15 TE in the league this season if it wasn't for injury. Jolley, in the right offense, will just be a very inconsistant pass catcher and he's a guy that can't block and will get 9 catches and 2 td's one week and then 2 catches the next. We have way too many holes on offense where we just can't afford to draft a TE (unless Pope magically falls to 35...).
They could be but they aren't much better then Baker. Ryan O'Callaghan, Daryn Colledge, or an OT that drops from the first round would fill much bigger needs with more talent at 35.
I was talking just TE but I would go #4 D'brick, #29 Mangold, #35 Bernstein and then who ever is the best player left on the board. I think with Chad with a good ball control offense could go all the way in a few years. We need a base to build around first. But there is alot of talent in this years draft so who knows what is going to happen.
