The Packers should have taken Chad

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by ouchy, Aug 8, 2008.

  1. ouchy

    ouchy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,341
    Likes Received:
    6,450
    I beleive if they wanted Chad they would have requested he be part of the trade. Obviously they did not request this.

    And IMO that was a mistake. Not just because they have no experience at the QB position. But also because if there is any team in the league that Chad would be a good fit on its the Bears. Chad on the Bears could cause some damage within that devision.
     
  2. IATA

    IATA Trolls

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    8,039
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rodgers is a better choice then Penny.
     
  3. Wild Thing

    Wild Thing New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    0
    As a Packer fan, I totally agree. I'd have felt a lot better going into this season with a veteran backup on staff.
     
  4. ollie

    ollie Right Wing NutJob

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,310
    Likes Received:
    38
    Never work... they don't want the competition with Rodgers & Chad wants to be the starter...
     
  5. Learn To Swim

    Learn To Swim 2008 Nightowltom "Best Non-Jets Poster" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2004
    Messages:
    5,596
    Likes Received:
    1
    Pennington in the Soldier Field wind? Seriously man?

    Maybe if they could sew his head onto Sexy Rexy's body.
     
  6. Hemi

    Hemi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    11,650
    Likes Received:
    457

    The wind would really hurt Chad. Good point.
     
  7. #17 with a bullet

    #17 with a bullet New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,235
    Likes Received:
    0
    Having no one to throw to would hurt chad as well.
     

Share This Page