The Jets should target a left tackle in the first round and a center in the second

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by jetfannerd, Mar 15, 2015.

  1. jetfannerd

    jetfannerd Trolls

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2014
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    212
    We need to try to recreate 2004 on draft day and grab a franchise LT and C.

    D'Brick and Mangold should be fine for one more season but their play is deteriorating and their salaries are not.

    Next year it really behooves the Jets to give both of the their gold watches.

    Brick has a 15 million cap hit 2016 and accounts or 10 million in savings if cut before June 1st.

    Mangold has a 9 million dollar cap hit and accounts for 9 million in savings.

    Needless to say it behooves the Jets to find a replacement.
     
  2. Axel3419

    Axel3419 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,203
    Likes Received:
    970
    You can't just target positions like that. There is no LT worth a top 6 pick this year. Gotta go BPA.

    That said, you're right about Brick's contract. He must be restructured next year and we have to find his replacement soon.
     
  3. DoubleDecker87

    DoubleDecker87 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    3,397
    Likes Received:
    1,435
    Nice thread man, makes a lot of sense for a draft that does not have a franchise LT nor C.
     
    JetBlue likes this.
  4. FlaJet

    FlaJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,014
    Likes Received:
    1,020
    Damn pat fans...:rolleyes::eek::p
     
  5. NCJetsfan

    NCJetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages:
    36,684
    Likes Received:
    30,193
    No, we shouldn't. We don't have two first round picks, and you don't need to draft both in one draft. Mangold is still playing at a very high level, and his play hasn't deteriorated that much. Brick and the LT position is the one that is getting critical. Besides, the Jets may already have Mangold's replacement on the roster in Dalton Freeman.
     
  6. Footballgod214

    Footballgod214 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    15,245
    Likes Received:
    6,102
    Outside QB, a stud LT and his counterpart pass rushing OLB are the two hardest positions to fill. Teams really can't wait until the need someone and just grab anyone, especially LT.

    I know this draft is soft in LTs, but I would say as soon as we have a shot at a good/great on, either through the draft or trade, get it done, even if it means passing on another more glamorous skill position.

    Make it happen Macc!
     
  7. James Hasty

    James Hasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    15,980
    Likes Received:
    5,264
  8. Poeman

    Poeman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    14,567
    Likes Received:
    8,405
    Mangold is fine, D'Brick lets see how his year goes, but we can't keep him at that cap number. He probably re-does his deal...I hope, we need our core guys
     
  9. al_toon_88

    al_toon_88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,820
    Likes Received:
    331
    Zack Martin last year would have been a home run.

    Unfortunately, Jerry Jones caved.

    And Idzik was locked in on his safety from Louisville.
     
  10. TwoHeadedMonster

    TwoHeadedMonster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Messages:
    3,130
    Likes Received:
    3,325
    I am all about us addressing the o-line in a big way this year, but that's more than little extreme. If we can trade down from the 6 and turn thar into multiple picks in the first two rounds, then ok. We need to come out of this draft with some potential at LT and at the guard positions, but we also have needed to pick a pass rushing linebacker since, um, yeah, forever.
     
  11. James Hasty

    James Hasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    15,980
    Likes Received:
    5,264
    The best draft in our history was in 1977. We took the following players:

    Code:
    Round    Overall    Player    Position    Birthdate    College
    1    4    Marvin Powell    OT    08/30/1955    Southern California
    2    33    Wesley Walker    WR    05/26/1955    California
    3    72    Tank Marshall    DT    01/06/1955    Texas A&M
    4    90    Scott Dierking    RB    05/24/1955    Purdue
    5    116    Perry Griggs    WR    09/17/1954    Troy State
    5    129    Gary Gregory    OT    04/18/1955    Baylor
    6    144    Joe Klecko    DT    10/15/1953    Temple
    7    168    Charlie White    RB    08/31/1953    Bethune-Cookman
    7    171    Bob Grupp    P    05/08/1955    Duke
    7    195    Kevin Long    RB    01/20/1955    South Carolina
    8    200    Dan Alexander    OG    06/17/1955    Louisiana State
    8    210    Ed Thompson    LB    10/06/1954    Ohio State
    9    227    Matt Robinson    QB    06/28/1955    Georgia
    10    256    John Hennessy    LB    03/12/1955    Michigan
    11    307    Dave Butterfield    DB    07/29/1954    Nebraska
    12    312    Phil Gargis    RB    07/06/1955    Auburn
    12    313    Dave Conrad    OT    10/27/1953    Maryland
    So we should take OT, WR, DT, RB in the first four rounds.

    Since we don't have a fifth round pick we skip WR and OT and proceed to take a DT in round 6.

    We only have two seventh rounders so it is up to us if we should take two RBs or an RB plus a punter.

    If we stick to the plan this year is sure to tie 1977 for our best draft ever.
     
  12. pclfan

    pclfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2013
    Messages:
    5,223
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    I love the idea of drafting two o-linemen high like we did with Brick and Mangold and with that big cap hit next year Brick has to go. But this might mot be the year to draft a tackle.
     
  13. Footballgod214

    Footballgod214 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    15,245
    Likes Received:
    6,102
    Klecko in the 6th round? Sweet!!! Thanks for the history lesson.

    Powell, Alexander, one-eyed Wesley Walker, AND Klecko all in the same draft? Incredible. I remember Manish Metha blasting us for selecting a "legally blind wide receiver".
     
  14. thirtyoddfreestyle

    thirtyoddfreestyle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2003
    Messages:
    1,498
    Likes Received:
    297
    i really like the idea of trading mar iota (if available at 6) to the browns for 2 first rounders - makes my pants bulge
     
  15. tomdeb

    tomdeb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,458
    Likes Received:
    3,208
    You are right about addressing OL in the draft. Not sure about the #6 pick, but round 2 and 3 should be OL. Too many years of Rex Ryan drafting defense has hurt.
     
  16. James Hasty

    James Hasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    15,980
    Likes Received:
    5,264
    One year the Raiders drafted a RB named Joe Aska who was blind in one eye. Al Davis said it was OK because it was the same eye that is patched in the Raiders logo.
     
    74, TNJet and Footballgod214 like this.
  17. FlaJet

    FlaJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,014
    Likes Received:
    1,020
    Suggestion: as you didn't what side. LOL
    [​IMG]
     
  18. JoeWillie130

    JoeWillie130 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,362
    Likes Received:
    55
    I don't see center as a need. Mangold is still playing at a high level. I think he probably has a few good years left in this league definitely more than 1 or 2.
     
    JetsNation06 and Professor like this.
  19. joe

    joe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    8,993
    Likes Received:
    5,634
    While I would never put it past Manish Metha saying something stupid, you sure about this one? I only ask because I don't think Metha was around or on the scene at the time Walker was drafted, and if he was blasting the pick in retrospect (looking at the career Walker's had) that would be stupid as well.
     
  20. GreenGreek

    GreenGreek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2002
    Messages:
    2,185
    Likes Received:
    547
    I'm on board with targeting OL. I'm not sure we can secure a Brick replacement in this draft, but over the next 2 years, we'll have to replace at least 2 of Brick, Breno & Mangold with younger/cheaper replacements. We could also use OG help as well. If anything, we may be more likely to land Breno's replacement than Brick's in this draft. I'm all in favor of landing a guy that can start at OG this year & kick out to OT next year.
     

Share This Page