The Jets should sign Jeff Posey

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by WarriorRB28, Aug 7, 2006.

  1. WarriorRB28

    WarriorRB28 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2003
    Messages:
    10,433
    Likes Received:
    2,530
    Buffalo released him.

    http://www.realfootball365.com/nfl/articles/2006/05/jeff-posey-bills110506.html


    Posey to DE is an interesting option for the Bills
    By Connor J. Byrne on May 11, 2006 02 0 AM
    Permalink | Comments (9) | RSS | <+> More Bills News

    Buffalo Bills strong side linebacker Jeff Posey has drawn a lot of criticism since joining the team as a free agent prior to the 2003 season. He was brought over from the Houston Texans , where he had eight sacks in 2002, to be a pass-rushing linebacker for the Bills. However, in four seasons with the Bills he has compiled just 9.5 sacks. Why? Because his specialty in rushing the opposing quarterback lies in the 3-4 defensive alignment. In Buffalo, the 30-year-old has been and still is stuck in a much different scheme, the 4-3.

    Surprisingly, Posey is yet to be released by the Bills, but this still is a possibility. At the same time there's a chance that Posey will remain the team's starting linebacker on the left side, since backup Angelo Crowell is often viewed as too small to play the position. If the Bills' defensive coordinator, Perry Fewell, does like Crowell better than Posey as a starter then Buffalo will find themselves not knowing where to put Posey.

    Although he's only 241 pounds, the left defensive end position could be a good place for Posey to transition. Currently, the Bills' strikingly unspectacular duo at that particular spot includes Ryan Denney and Chris Kelsay, two ex-second-rounders who have failed to live up to their draft status. Because of that, it might be worthwhile for Fewell, and head coach Dick Jauron, to at least give Posey a crack at the position. If he fails, then cut the cord on the experiment and simply move on.

    Since most defensive ends are at least 260 pounds, many may be viewing this idea as a joke. However, given the fact that the Bills' new "Tampa 2" defensive scheme does require smaller, quicker linemen, it may be a novel idea. One of the notable "Tampa 2" defenses in the league belongs to the eternally tremendous Indianapolis Colts . Much like the Bills, they possess small, fast linemen with the know-how and quickness to stymie opposing offenses.

    Guess how much one of the Colts' main defensive ends weighs? 250? 260? Nope. 235. Of course, I'm speaking of one of the NFL's most underrated sack artists, Robert Mathis. The 25-year-old has silently accumulated a whopping 22 sacks over the last two seasons, including 10.5 in 2004 and 11.5 in 2005. Mathis was viewed as an upstart as an end, but he's done more than enough to prove his critics wrong.

    Since Posey outweighs the successful Mathis by six pounds, there's no reason why he can't experience the same type of on-field triumphs. Posey is a solid leader and an asset to the Bills' locker room, making it prudent for the defensive coaching staff to keep him involved on the field. Rushing the passer is his strength, and it's something the Buffalo Bills ' defense is weak at, so he'd certainly fill a need area.

    He may be unheralded, but Posey seems like the man for the job at the left end position in Buffalo. Give it a try, Fewell and Jauron. You'll thank me when the results come in.

    --Connor J. Byrne can be reached at cbyrne@realfootball365.com
     
  2. McCluneNYJ

    McCluneNYJ Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    30
    It sure makes alot of sense, doesn't it.

    Especially with our apparent lack of true starting depth as pass rushing WOLB.
     
  3. 10nyjets87

    10nyjets87 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    3,919
    Likes Received:
    0
    platoon him and thomas at pass rushing OLB.
     
  4. bigalxc

    bigalxc Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with the Warrior
     
  5. Carpetbagger

    Carpetbagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,714
    Likes Received:
    194
    I have watched a lot of Buffalo Bills football over the years (since I was originally from Rochester), so I have seen Posey play several times over the past few seasons. Posey is a decent player, but he is 30 years old and he was making 2-3 million a year, by just being an average player.

    If we could get Posey for a decent price tag, than I guess it would be worth the shot, but not for the money that he was being payed with the Bills.
     
  6. Jtuds

    Jtuds Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,641
    Likes Received:
    1
    I personally don't think it is a good move unless he is cheap. If Curtis indeed cannot return we will need a high profile RB moreso than a pretty good LB. I personally think we are looking good enough at LB with Vilma, Barton, Hobson, Thomas, and the 2 new guys. Picking up Posey now would sort of wipe out the other pick ups we made at LB. I do think he could contribute though, but he is older so putting him in there for a year that isn't gonna be all that great anyways would just take away the opportunity for other guys.
     
  7. Jetdic

    Jetdic Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,476
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ask any Bills fan, Posey is terrible. He's a non factor on defense. Stamer is even better than him.
     
  8. SigmaXJet

    SigmaXJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,484
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don' think he would be that great of a pick up, he was so-so in Buffalo, but I wouldn't mind some added depth at LB
     
  9. McCluneNYJ

    McCluneNYJ Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    30
    He was also miscast in the 4-3 on the outside.

    Remember that experiment with had with Sam Cowart in that role?
     
  10. NY2MD_FS

    NY2MD_FS Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    8
    not that I don't agree but why is it that every time a team cuts a player someone has to post on here that the jets should pick him up. Not everyone will fit in with our team further more the players that get cut might not neccesarily want to come here. We aren't the most attractive option out there. As far as Posey goes he would add depth to our team at the weak side nothing more.
     
  11. AMJets

    AMJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    22,507
    Likes Received:
    77
    If he was playing in a 4-3, and his specialty is a pass rushing 3-4, how can he criticized for what happened in Buffalo, in the 4-3? Depending on the price, I wouldn't mind signing Posey. But it seems we have plenty of LBs at this time.
     
  12. Tight

    Tight Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Messages:
    2,868
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess the problem is , he should of adjusted by now.
     
  13. McCluneNYJ

    McCluneNYJ Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    30
    Did Cowart ever adjust?

    How effective do you think Willie McGinest would be as a 4-3 OLB?

    Same way J. Abraham isn't suited for a 3-4 end position.
     
  14. AMJets

    AMJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    22,507
    Likes Received:
    77
    If his entire game is based upon pass-rushing as a 3-4 OLB, how is he going to adjust to a 4-3?
     
  15. Tight

    Tight Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Messages:
    2,868
    Likes Received:
    0
    Players have made that adjustment. Please tell me your kidding. With 18,000 posts this must be some sick joke. Good players ADJUST. If that's how you think, then I guess Vilma should just quit now.
     
    #15 Tight, Aug 9, 2006
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2006
  16. AMJets

    AMJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    22,507
    Likes Received:
    77
    WTF are you talking about? I'm saying if his specialty is 3-4 pass-rushing, how can he be expected to adjust to a 4-3 and still play at the same level he was before when that defense takes away his greatest trait. It would be like turning an all-pro offensive lineman into a wide receiver, and expecting him to remain at the all-pro level. If his greatest strength is blocking, and that is his specialty, how can he be asked to continue to play at that all-pro level if you're taking that away from him? That's what you're doing by putting a pass-rushing specialist in the 3-4 into a 4-3 and having him block or drop back. Taking away what he does best.
     

Share This Page