Possible 4 picks in the top 38

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by vilma5112, Apr 25, 2006.

  1. vilma5112

    vilma5112 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lets say we do trade with the raiders for their 7th and 38th for our 4th. Who are the four players we take with our 4 picks: 7,29,35,37??
     
  2. The Dark Knight

    The Dark Knight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    27,084
    Likes Received:
    14,327
    I would say:
    Cutler
    Mangold
    Vick
    Croyle
     
    #2 The Dark Knight, Apr 25, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 4, 2005
  3. jamesAngleton

    jamesAngleton New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Messages:
    184
    Likes Received:
    0
    #7 - Ngata
    #29 - Carpenter
    #35 - Croyle
    #38 - Mcneil
     
  4. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    I am not trying to ruin your thread, but at this point my brain hurts from all these different scenarios...I am just ready for the draft to be here.
     
  5. ButtleMan

    ButtleMan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    Messages:
    6,770
    Likes Received:
    0

    2 Qb's in the first 2 rounds ?????? Are you high?

    Justice
    Carpenter/Lawson
    McNeil
    White if he falls.
     
  6. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    Actually he has us taking three...Cutler, Vick and Croyle. Obviously he was just kidding. Why? I have no idea...
     
  7. vilma5112

    vilma5112 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    i love buttlemans scenerio: we get 2 great OT, starter on D, and a possible Jerome Bettis
     
  8. ButtleMan

    ButtleMan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    Messages:
    6,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    I didnt even realize Vick since he so far off the radar...:lol:
     
  9. Jtuds

    Jtuds Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,641
    Likes Received:
    1
    I like this idea. 7 would be a more reasonable spot to take Cutler so we could make that trade, get Cutler, then maybe Lendale at 29, McNeill at 35, and maybe a Guard at 37...I would be pretty happy with that, the only question would be with White at 29.....maybe instead we should use the 29th pick on the best guy at his position that has not yet been taken....be it a LB or CB or whatever...
     
  10. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    7 - Hawk - LB
    29 - Winston - RT
    35 - Watson - NT
    38 - White - RB
    71 - Eslinger - OC
    97 - Martin - QB
     
  11. vilma5112

    vilma5112 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    its very possibly that we get 4 starters if that trade goes through
     
  12. vilma5112

    vilma5112 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    if we took ngata wow i wuld kill someone
     
  13. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    My scenario gets us 5 starters if Lendale wins the starting job in camp.
     
  14. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    How would Hawk fall past the Packers at 5? Because if we move to 7 it means Mario Williams was off the board at 2...I don't think the Packers will pass on Hawk.
     
    #14 PennyandtheJets, Apr 25, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 4, 2005
  15. SuppaMan

    SuppaMan New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    7)Ferguson, Hawk, Davis, Huff in that order of whose there
    29)Lawson, Carpenter, Allen, Mangold, Winston (he depends on if we take ferguson)..in that order, unless we don't get Ferg, then we jump on Winston if he's there
    35)Carpenter, Allen, Mangold
    38)Allen, Mangold, Cromartie, Pope, McNeil

    all those in order except the note i put with winston...its hard to tell whose going to be there, but those guys all have chances at those spots to be there, so blah whatever agreed, to many scenarios, i cant wait till monday so all this is over with
     
  16. JetsFanAce51

    JetsFanAce51 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why the hell would we draft 3 QB's???
    We just got a center too...Great picks...

    thank god you aren't our GM
     
  17. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    1 - Texans - Bush
    2 - Saints - Brick
    3 - Titans - Young
    4 - Raiders - Leinart
    5 - Packers - Williams
    6 - 49ers - Davis
    7 - Jets - Hawk
     
  18. kbgreen

    kbgreen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,659
    Likes Received:
    32

    I just can't see the 49ers taking a TE, They have a good one and like us a ton of needs. I think If this happens we will get Davis not Hawk!
     
  19. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    The 49ers do not have a single playmaker on their entire team. They have needs everywhere, so I have them going BPA. Their TE is good, but has been inured over 50% of the time since he came into the NFL. Give your 1st year QB a threat like Davis and suddenly fans have a reason to pay attention again.
     
  20. New York Mick

    New York Mick Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    I second that
     

Share This Page