Is anyone surprised by the Danny Ware Release?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by KyleBradyoverSapp, Sep 1, 2007.

  1. KyleBradyoverSapp

    KyleBradyoverSapp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    You have to think they are very interested in one of the RB cuts that happened over the weekend.
     
  2. ess-dog

    ess-dog New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,081
    Likes Received:
    0
    maybe the FO is thinging of picking up a vet.

    Im guess it also proves that Thomas Jones will be ready to go next week
     
  3. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    I was at first but having tutt at 3rd RB gives us an option for 2nd FB too and saves a roster spot.
     
  4. BK_Jetsfan

    BK_Jetsfan New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    He's going to be good. I'm disappointed by the cut.
     
  5. ThunderbirdJet

    ThunderbirdJet New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    6,697
    Likes Received:
    0
    Stunned and pretty pissed about it. 2 RB's, 2 FB's and FIVE TE's? wtf?
     
  6. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    No way the final 53 man roster only has those 4 running backs. Maybe they are hoping they can get Ware on the practice squad and activate him later in the season.
     
  7. Twombles

    Twombles Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2005
    Messages:
    4,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just what i was thinking...
     
  8. deviljets7

    deviljets7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,537
    Likes Received:
    319
    I'm surprised, but I think it means that they are about to add a RB that was recently waived.
     
  9. FITM

    FITM 2006 TGG.com Best Photoshop Artist Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    5,550
    Likes Received:
    0
    Practice Squad material.
     
  10. ThunderbirdJet

    ThunderbirdJet New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    6,697
    Likes Received:
    0
    None of the rooks that got waived (or vets for that matter) looked better than Ware did. Until proven otherwise, I classify this as a MAJOR FU by the Tangini's. Tutt is all of a sudden the #3 RB? BULL****! And with Jones all messed up, not to mention the HGH thing, where he was playing under a coach in Chicago that just got suspended for 5 games for using the stuff. Some team will pick Ware up... watch.
     
  11. BonScott

    BonScott Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    79
    Very suprised. Keeping 5 TE's and Tutt, I figured Pociask or Ryan could take Tutt's spot and Ware would be #3 tailback. I guess this means TJ is ready to go.
     
  12. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    Artose Pinner and Antonio Pittman are available. (Pittman's not a vet, though. He was a 4th round selection this past April).
     
  13. sec314

    sec314 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    4,641
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    They are looking to trade one of the TE's so they choose to protect them instead of releasing. Ryan is a good 3 TE. He has value. Tangini have a plan so lets give them a chance. I have seen no reason not to continue to believe in these 2.
     
  14. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    Agree with ya all the way.

    Who knows, maybe they think the O-line is so bad they plan on usenig some 3 or 4 TE sets.:smile:
     
  15. GBA

    GBA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,690
    Likes Received:
    126
    I'm surprised. Even though Ware didn't look all that impressive to me in preseason, I thought he'd be alright as a #3. I would have liked to see Tutt go though, can't imagine why we kept him.
     
  16. #28Martin

    #28Martin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,531
    Likes Received:
    452
    WHAT? THEY LOVE TUTT,,,,, HE wasn't CLOSE TO GETTING CUT... GEEZ.
     
  17. IrishSteveZ

    IrishSteveZ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,729
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ware actually did look impressive, he looked like a nice 3rd back to have. I'm very shocked by this.
    I guess this means Thomas Jones is ready to go.
     
  18. ScotlandJet

    ScotlandJet New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,226
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can't see it. Ware will be snapped up by someone. I was real surprised to see this.
     
  19. greenlantern

    greenlantern Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    1
    i liked ware and ventrone
    they both looked good this preseason
     
  20. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    I think Brad Smith's poor play at QB cost Danny a rsoter spot. They like flexibility and Tutt gives them that but if smith could have been the #3 QB and a backup WR then a roster spot would have opened and Ware probably would have made it.
     

Share This Page