Ban Rajensen

Discussion in 'Feedback & Suggestions' started by vxvenom, Sep 29, 2006.

  1. vxvenom

    vxvenom Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    He angers people, contributes nothing, and is only here in a flaming/trolliing capacity. I see no reason why the mods haven't banned him yet. This site isn't a bastion of free speech, it's a place for Jet fans, and more generally NFL fans, to come together and discuss issues pertaining to the team in a civil matter. Just in the same way we have rules against personal attacks or rules against foul language, perhaps we should have rules against trolling. In his 400-some odd posts, I have yet to find 1 which had any positive thing to say. He clearly exists exclusivly in an argumentative role. Ban this loser!
     
  2. Dinobot 2

    Dinobot 2 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    19,335
    Likes Received:
    1
    LOL. This is the most original feedback topic Iv'e ever seen.
     
  3. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,435
    I haven't read all his posts but the posts in the thread I posted in he was right on the money w/ FACTS.
     
  4. asscue35

    asscue35 New Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2003
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    1
    If you do not like what he has to say, ignore it, I am happy we are not in Afghanistan. Freedom of speech buddy.
     
  5. vxvenom

    vxvenom Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nice argument buddy, except freedom of speech doesn't apply to private enterprises like this board. It's already been established that there is no freedome of speech here (cannot curse, make personal attacks), and all I'm asking to do is extend that to flaming and trolling.

    It is feedback, notably, on the regulation mods should use. I think obvious trolls who simply post to get a rise out of people should be banned.

    I'm not denying that he posts facts. In fact, I agree with you, he does. But he misrepresents statistics in support of his argument, again, to get a rise out of people. Personally, I love coming here to read the various opinion of Jet fans along the spectrum, from sunshiner to darksider. I consider myself to be a big darksider. However, it's clear to me, this guy is just here because he knows he can piss people off and not to engage in civil conversation. He'll start a controversial topic and then leave when everyone disagrees with him, come back the next day and do it again. Click his name and go through his previous posts and tell me if this is the type of poster you think contributes something of value to this board.
     
  6. Angry Teste

    Angry Teste Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    3
    This should be in the form of a poll.
     
  7. Dinobot 2

    Dinobot 2 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    19,335
    Likes Received:
    1

    Deal with it then. The public topic was the wrong way to go. If we ban guys like him then we'd have to ban others. I can hear the pissed off posters now. Where would it end? That's why Petro's current rules are the best.
     
  8. 1028

    1028 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    1
    :lol: at this thread
     
  9. BIG COUNTRY

    BIG COUNTRY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,927
    Likes Received:
    30
    Rajensen is a tool, I dont think he should be banned however he should his man-love for Herm Edwards.
     
  10. lightning

    lightning Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wait....huh? i know he wants herm but that sentence made no sense.
     
  11. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    He shot his man-love for Edwards or he showed his man-love for Edwards?
     

Share This Page