for the lazy 4. D'Brick OT 29. Manny Lawson DE/LB 35. Ashton Youboty CB 71. Jerius Norwood RB 97. Kellen Clemens QB 103. Jonathan Lewis DT 117. David Thomas TE 128. Adam Stenevich OG 211. Marques Colston WR
I'm not a fan of a CB that early and once you aren't going with one of the top 5 RB's, I don't know if I like the others enough to use a 3rd or 4th on a RB. I also think they wait too long to address DT.
You can gladly have it. Screw this draft junk, already. No offense. Aside from the fact that mocks have benn beaten to death, any one having us pick Brick at four can be burned.
Colston. Yes. I'd Love That. I Want Him Really Badly. He Has The Body And Skill Of A T.o. Coming Out Of College Sans Atitude Meaning He Drops Some But He Has The Body Of A God. I Want Him Reallly Bad For Our Team, We Could Mold Him Into A Serious Player. Hofstra Product Who People Count Out...hmm Sounds Familar
Keep that draft to yourself- it's horrible! I guess we are set at OT- maybe there's something I have missed thus far during the offseason. Center- nah we don't need no center, we have a recycled Bills player and behind him we have, we have, oh wait, we have Katnik, so everything will be ok. Lawson doesn't drop to 29 and we won't be dumb enough to spend our 35 on a CB, where there isn't as much of a need as we have in other positions, including DT, OG, RB and QB. Please burn this mock...
Explain to me why people do 7 round mocks. They are pointless exercises. Their chance of being accurate are about as high as me hitting powerball.. 6 weeks in a row.
I like the one on cnnsi better myself where we take Williams and White, although they have Moroney going right after White and I would prefer Moroney my self
The only pick on that list I like is Lawson. A CB in round TWO? We have what, 4 or 5 of them right now? That would be a serious misstep by this new regime, and might get them booed right out of Rockefeller Center. I'm not a Brick fan, but I guess I would deal with it, though if we lost out on Williams, I'd rather take a QB (which I don't really want) or trade down. I flirted with the idea of Davis for a little while, but he is another player at a position we already have overfilled. How about Hawk if Williams is gone?
even better, the geniuses at ESPN had us taking Youboty at 29 on their show last night, and almost everyone was proclaiming what a great idea this was. I about wanted to puke...
You much rather prefer either Jean-Gilles, Winston, Howard, McNeil, or Watson at 35. Not hight on Youboty at all.
Winston is gone by mid-first... Jean-Gilles is a name we heard ALOT about in recent weeks, but then all of a sudden his name fell off the radar- any particular reason for this? Mangold at 29 would make me very happy.
How about Nic Mangold at center if available... I've seen Mocks where he still would be there.. If he is, the Jets are picking him at 29 That would make the most sense for the line since it would put Kendall back at his natural position
dude...read that again to yourself......now if you are unhappy with a decision that the front office makes tomorrow,go back and read this again...it seems youre having great trouble making up your mind.hopefully the front office can thin a little clearer...im not bustin balls i just thought it was funny reading that:beer:
If you look at it, we have every position filled on the field. The problem is that at QB, RB, WR, TE, OL, NT, DE, pass rushing OLB, and possibly CB, we have mediocrity. You don't want a QB, you don't want a tight end. And the one position you say that we need is an OLB, where we have Hobson and Barton already, with Kassell and Vilma inside. How are Baker and Jolley overfilling a position and Hobson and Barton isn't?
