Aldon Smith suspended for 9 games

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by Faux machine, Aug 29, 2014.

  1. Faux machine

    Faux machine Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Messages:
    2,834
    Likes Received:
    2,116
  2. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    Good, im sure Harbaugh will try to find a way to play him.
     
  3. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Good. This is a guy who's going to blow the magnificent gift he's been given. Couldn't have happened to a bigger asshat.

    _
     
  4. TNJet

    TNJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    He would have been great in"The Longest Yard".
     
  5. Greenday4537

    Greenday4537 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,804
    Likes Received:
    3,255
  6. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Well, he didn't REALLY have a bomb, everyone knew he was just kidding. No harm no foul as it were.

    _
     
  7. Greenday4537

    Greenday4537 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,804
    Likes Received:
    3,255
    It doesn't matter. You don't yell that you have a bomb in an airport for extremely obvious reasons.
     
  8. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    That was sarcasm. You and I know that.

    Barcs claimed it was no big deal because he didn't ACTUALLY have a bomb and it was probably obvious to everyone that he was just joshing.

    Dude should have done jail time.

    _
     
  9. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    done arguing with stokes. please delete this.
     
    #9 Barcs, Sep 2, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2014
  10. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Obssession? You're more like a hemorrhoid that needs perpetual Preparation H you're such an asswad.

    Don't run away from your bullshit--own it--YOU said (i) it was no big deal because Smith didn't actually HAVE a bomb--that it would have been serious if he actually had a bomb and (ii) everyone knew he was joking so it really shouldn't have been such a big deal.

    Saying "bomb" at an airport is not a "misunderstanding". A misunderstanding is when you read the sign wrong and you get in the TRE line as opposed to the regular security line. Or you thought you had asked for the gluten free meal but you instead asked for the kosher meal.

    And the twitter thing, I actually was advocating arresting the PARENTS of the teenage twits that thought it funny to tweet death threats, and I believe it. Just like when a parent should be responsible for any underage doing something stupid like that.

    Btw, I don't give a crap whether Smith has a drinking problem or not--fuck him if he can't control it, but regardless, you say "bomb" in an airport, that's not a joke and you should be held responsible. That he was let off is just sending the wrong message and was obviously done because the guys a football player. Joe Blow gets arrested and prosecuted.

    _
     
  11. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    done arguing - please delete
     
    #11 Barcs, Sep 3, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2014
  12. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Yeah you did and a bunch of posters hung you out like the bitch you are. You weren't joking then, conveniently asserting you are joking now is your weak ass running away from your shit. The thread is gone but you said it, more than once. "No big deal, he didn't REALLY have a bomb, and everyone knew he was obviously joking." That's on you, own it bitch.

    How fucking stupid are you? Underage kids are juveniles, can't be prosecuted as adults. The only person responsible are the persons responsible for THEM. If kids are underage and drink in their parents house, then illegally get in a car and drive drunk, you know who they go after? The parents. Vandalism? Same thing. Yeah, go after the parents to drive juvenile behavior.

    What the fuck does slipping on the ice in front of a store have to do with parents being held legally responsible for the actions of their children? That's just a stupid analogy and missed the point you dumbass.

    And stop following me around, it's creepy. I understand you're into that stuff but I'm not.

    _
     
  13. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    don't want to derail this thread any further.
     
    #13 Barcs, Sep 3, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2014
  14. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    LOL, you're not only a bitch, you're the board clown. You've been dropping my name while Byz has been humiliating you on the main board so you hop off, bitch.

    _
     
  15. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Never said for life, I said arrest them and make them responsible. There IS no personal responsibility for underage juveniles. If YOU don't understand this very basic point then YOU'RE a fucking moron--but we all know that.

    _
     
  16. 101GangGreen101

    101GangGreen101 2018 Thread of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    22,232
    Likes Received:
    12,246
    49ers might not make the playoffs. A lot of players missing on defense and now you got the domestic violence issue with Ray McDonald.
     
  17. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    _
     
    #17 Barcs, Sep 3, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2014
  18. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    Show me the quote but it's not far off from where I'm at. Kids can't take responsibility for themselves since they are juveniles. Drive behavior through punishment. Parents in the next town got ARRESTED for an underage drinking party at their house that they had no knowledge of because a 15 year old had her stomach pumped.

    You know what never happened again in MY town?

    Parents are held civilly liable for vandalism and car accidents all the time for their juveniles. Make terroristic threats regardless of how stupid or unrealistic, charge them criminally for their underage children.

    You think these "pranks" are jokes, just kidding, not real. That's irrelevant. Ding the parents to set an example and no twit 15 year old is tweeting death threats again.

    You take ludicrous positions to drive discussion and when folks call you out for being a clown you say you were just joking.

    We all know you're not, you're a clown. The jester of backtracking.

    Now go give your wife/GF/mother the back of your hand.

    _
     
    #18 JStokes, Sep 3, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2014
  19. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    _
     
    #19 Barcs, Sep 3, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2014
  20. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    No, we all got your point and you were done when you made it.

    Juveniles are not criminally or civilly responsible for their actions.

    The state or the aggrieved party needs recompense.

    That can only come from one party, the party responsible for the juvenile.

    The parents.

    Is pulling a fire alarm in school a prank? Harmless? Just a joke? What about a junior high schooler kiddingly calling in a bomb scare? Well there wasn't REALLY a bomb so no harm no foul, right ? Just like Aldon Smith.

    Who pays? The child? With what penalty? It's a juvenile, no criminal charges, so scott free, right? What about a death threat against say, the President? Well the kid was just joking, right? Harmless prank, she didn't REALLY mean to kill the President.

    What's the punishment to a juvenile?

    Nothing?

    Yeah, we got your point. Children don't HAVE personal responsibility because they are juveniles. Parents do.

    And it has NOTHING to do with someone slipping and falling on ice outside a deli.

    _
     

Share This Page