3 man rush in 3-4 D.... :(

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by StreetFighterJet, Sep 23, 2008.

  1. StreetFighterJet

    StreetFighterJet New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,071
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seriously, what is the point of this?

    We should NEVER rush only 3 in a 3-4 D, its basically saying, go ahead, complete a pass, take your time, no rush... just wait until someone gets open.... ahhh there you go! Nice job!! HOOORAY!!!!
     
  2. ouchy

    ouchy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,229
    Likes Received:
    6,285
    I agree. As we all know by now, if Jenkins is going to miss games we need to make some serious changes.
     
  3. zeike

    zeike New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed

    Again. Agreed. And the worst part of this is not only do we get no pressure and give opposing QBs all day to throw but we somehow manage to give up big plays with 8 roaming D-men. You would think even without pressure we could keep any plays given up with the 3 man rush to underneath stuff gaining only a couple of yards. No, rushing 3 we manage to have what seems like single coverage all over the field and matchups like David Harris trying to cover LT in space. I did not realize that Chambers and VJax required 5 people to cover them (assuming we of course have 2 on Gates)... Chambers certainly didn't look too blanketed on his TD last night.
     
  4. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    We should go back to the 4-3. It will only take a couple more years to bring back guys who can play in it.
     

Share This Page