Robertson, Vilma two big reasons why Jets? switch to 3-4 scheme may take time

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by DaBallhawk, Apr 3, 2006.

  1. minexdy1013

    minexdy1013 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pass rusher...rush backer....what do you really want? Why would you need a rush backer when that's primarily the D line's job in the 3-4 SCHEME with your STOUT DL's?? Your pass rushers in the 3-4 Scheme are PRIMARILY YOUR OLB's.

    Get your facts right.
     
    #21 minexdy1013, Apr 3, 2006
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2006
  2. dwalsh

    dwalsh 2006 TGG.com Rookie of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,735
    Likes Received:
    6

    cut him some slack.. he made a typo - get over it
     
  3. minexdy1013

    minexdy1013 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Over it. :drunk:
     
  4. nyjetsjetsjets

    nyjetsjetsjets New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    0

    I just can't see the purpose of having Thomas outside. I could only see a role in the 43 as the weak side end. Drafting Mario gives us an opportunity to put him (Mario) as the outside weak 'backer in the 34 and the 43 strongside end.
    Besides, i'd rather have JV blitzing from the strongside when we play teams with athletic TE's. All in all, we will be unpredictable on defense and that's what matters most.
     
  5. ColezDeep!

    ColezDeep! New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    0
    We're forgetting we have Chatham and he's going to make a bid to start...he's 6'4 250...I know he's hasn't done much playing behind Bruschi but I think he's going to get a shot this year
     
  6. Nyjets4eva

    Nyjets4eva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    1,300
    I agree Colezdeep Chatham will def. I think show he is comin in here to try 2 start, but we will see wut happens. I hope we draft Mario I jus think he would fit ne D.
     
  7. MN_Jet_Fan

    MN_Jet_Fan New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Messages:
    690
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would have already cut Robertson. That's just me. As for Vilma's size, last I've heard, speed is much more important to LBers in the 3-4 than size.
     
  8. SuppaMan

    SuppaMan New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    AJ Hawk would not be the rushing LB in a 3-4 system. I didn't make any typos. Deal with reality. He'd probably be an ILB in the 3-4. He would not be the guy rushing most of the time.

    Hell, and after reading that for the third time, it doesn't even make sense. Especially when re-reading what you quoted from me and then gave that insane response.
     
  9. IrishSteveZ

    IrishSteveZ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,729
    Likes Received:
    0
    DT? Not a chance in hell.
     
    #29 IrishSteveZ, Apr 4, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 5, 2005
  10. nightowltom

    nightowltom New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    874
    Likes Received:
    0
    They wouldn't have to. They could just pass to the tight end or a back coming out of the backfield all day at 10-15 yards a pop. I'd pay money just to see Robertson move in to anticipate the run and suddenly reverse gears to try to drop back (on those bad knees) in coverage when he sees pass. SOMETHING would fall off the man for sure :)
     
  11. vilmatic

    vilmatic Active Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    12
    Thomas at tackle, Ellis at tackle, Robertson at end. All these things happened last year. And yet none of those people played LB. Looking at Mario he's got the strength and size to do it. Personally, I think 3-4 end is his made-in-heaven position, but I think he can play all the d-line positions in a 3-4 and 4-3. And profootballweekly agrees, which is good enough for me.
     
  12. minexdy1013

    minexdy1013 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    What doesn't make sense out of my "insane response" I'm curious to know since you really haven't been objective about it with your post. What specific statement do you not understand.

    Are you trying to tell me: that AJ Hawk isn't a pass rusher? That's funny. :breakdance:

    Not to be a dick about it...but, do you actually know what a 3-4 Defense is?
     
  13. nyjetsjetsjets

    nyjetsjetsjets New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ouch! He probably meant to say 43 defense first, 34 defense second.
     

Share This Page