Miano's mock (with trade)

Discussion in 'Draft' started by Barry the Baptist, Mar 2, 2008.

  1. Warhound7

    Warhound7 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    820
    Likes Received:
    0
    Great mock, but getting Hardy at 36 is unrealistic, in my opinion. After his 40-yard dash, he instantly became considered a late first round talent. I think he's gone by the time #36 comes along.
     
  2. tanknyc

    tanknyc Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,968
    Likes Received:
    17
    If DMC falls to number 6 and we dont take him and trade well be seeing him on the pats next year running circles around us we need a impact player on offense and there he is
     
  3. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Point is IF Dallas wants MCfadden bad enough, why will they take the chance to wait for the sixth pick, when they can possible get him at the Raiders pick. (Make same trade two first and a player) Again Raiders players are off the board, and that trade would be very appealing to the Raiders. SO IMO Its a dream to think Jets are going to be able to pull off a trade like that, when teams in front of them , would probably like to do that same trade themselve. ( could really help themselve with the extra picks)
     
  4. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,577
    The big difference after the Raiders gave all that $$$ to Huggy Bear Fargas everybody in the league knows they won't be drafting DMC. The Raiders are going to think about trading up to grab one of their DL. I still think they draft Sedrick Ellis.... Al Davis generally has a hard on for SC guys. Don't get your hopes up of Oakland making a move they are too inept of a franchse to condier.
     
  5. joerockhead

    joerockhead New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think that we'd get 3 high draft picks for our #6 but I'd make the deal for any 2 of those picks and then get me a WR and Flacco!
     
  6. jamezmetsy

    jamezmetsy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    0
    jsut got rodgers-cromatire with 22 and groves with 28
     
  7. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't understand your point. Raiders won't be drafting MCfadden at four. Dallas would- thats why they are moving up to get their man. (reason why a trade back is a real possibility- both teams get what they are looking for) Raiders aren't moving up for a Dlineman because they already without a third and fifth rounder. (another reason for the trade back, to recoup more draft picks)

    Raiders aren't drafting Sedrick Ellis because he not the type of DT Raiders draft early, or the run stuffing DT they are in need of.
    Raiders are able to get Dallas both first rounders + (a player) for # 4. THan they can draft a Olineman, Run stuffing DT or a pass rusher speacialist and A WR(with third pick in second round.
    As you see alot of team fan base wo0uld love to trade back and get those two first rounders. Just don't coun't the Jets being in position to do that deal. (some team before them will make that trade with cowboys- IF they can can get both first rounders and if the cowboys intrest in MCfadden is that serious.

    BTw I don't think your thinking out the situation logically. IF TEams believe Raiders were going to take MCFadden at four, than a team that wanted MCFadden(Dallas) would want to trade up in front of Raiders. IF a team dosen't believe Raiders will draft MCfadden at four, than thats most likely the team they will try to trade up with.
     
    #27 Raiderjoe, Mar 4, 2008
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2008

Share This Page