What defnse do you like better for our team 3-4 or 4-3

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Greatful Jethead, Oct 10, 2007.

?

What defnse do you think our team should run 3-4 or 4-3

  1. 3-4

    27 vote(s)
    35.1%
  2. 4-3

    50 vote(s)
    64.9%
  1. Greatful Jethead

    Greatful Jethead New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,191
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like the 4-3 with our talent
     
  2. ScotsJet

    ScotsJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    3-4, it's more versatile and there's no sense pinning your system to mediocre short-term 'talent'.
     
  3. EarlytoRise

    EarlytoRise Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    418
    Likes Received:
    6
    Currently I'd say 4-3.
     
  4. MSUJet85

    MSUJet85 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,771
    Likes Received:
    196
    QFT, it would be dumb for a coach to change his system again right after the team is getting used to it.
     
  5. rillo

    rillo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes Received:
    0
    4-3 We have the personnel for it IMO
     
  6. Jet Blue

    Jet Blue New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mangini runs a Hybrid mixed front with the goal of being versitile and unpredictable....

    Based on what we have seen so far they don't have the personel to run either defense at a top level...

    Wether it's a 3-4 defense a 4-3 defense or the mix that they actually run, the Still need a Big Body DT!!!!

    All these people that think we run a straight up 3-4 and then think just changing the label to 4-3 will fix all the problems when we run 4-3 already many times, are just a little behind the Football curve but, it's nice and easy to regurgitate, hey even the media can do it.
     
  7. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    I don't care which one we pick, as long as we get the right personnel for it. Right now, we have nowhere near the right personnel for 3-4, but if that's what Mangini likes, we need to get that talent in here ASAP, we can't half-ass either one.

    Mangini wants the 3-4, fine by me. Get a pass rusher for it. Every successful 3-4 has a great edge rusher, whether it's Ware, Merriman, Terrell Suggs, Adalius Thomas, or someone else along those lines.
     
  8. ihatethedolphins3

    ihatethedolphins3 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    0
    wejust paid bryan thomas to be that guy, not so smart!
     
  9. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    bottom line is we never should've switched and mangini only did it out of stubbornness. We had zero players who were cut out for the 3-4.

    The 3-4 also caused some of the crappy acquisitions we made.
     
  10. rillo

    rillo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed....
     
  11. Jetsfan5

    Jetsfan5 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think we are now at an awkward mix of 3-4 and 4-3 personel. That attributes to the reason we suck. However, I think the fact that theres few decent players on the D is what makes it suck.
     
  12. VickBlows

    VickBlows Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    Likes Received:
    6
    Who cares – Mandipshit is currently working on the newest of all schemes – the 1 – 6. He’s just going to let Drob hold down the whole line himself. What vision…what an innovator…they don’t call him a genius for nothing.
     
  13. JetsYankeesThrylos

    JetsYankeesThrylos Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,670
    Likes Received:
    0
    this team isnt getting used to anything, 4-3 is what they are amazing at, plus the d-coordinator sucks
     
  14. Greatful Jethead

    Greatful Jethead New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,191
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow behind the football curve????? I think I am gonna regurgitate
     
  15. boomer

    boomer Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,925
    Likes Received:
    0
    I never was a fan of the 3-4.
     
  16. nyj55

    nyj55 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    241
    Likes Received:
    0
    We would have better play makers in the 4-3 right now
     
  17. nyj55

    nyj55 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    241
    Likes Received:
    0
    we would have better playmakers in the 4-3 right now. With that being said i think the future will prove the 3-4 to be the better system for us
     
  18. Jetcane

    Jetcane New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    2,258
    Likes Received:
    0
    We need more beef on the DL

    4-3

    The LBs couldnt do any worse than they are in the 3-4, so let 'em run a little more E-W and see if it helps.
     
  19. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,000
    Likes Received:
    25,077
    Right now, we don't have the personnel to run either one, but since we have coaches for the 3-4, however crappy they seem to be, I don't see any intelligent reason to switch back right now. A hybrid, maybe, but seeing how shitty the team performs under either alignment I don't see why change philosophies now, especially since we just traded up twice on Day 1 for 2 players that fit the 3-4 better.
     
  20. Miamipuck

    Miamipuck New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    11,429
    Likes Received:
    1
    Bingo............
     

Share This Page