Scik's Penny Passing Analysis ( Week 1 )

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Scikotic, Sep 12, 2007.

  1. Scikotic

    Scikotic Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    11,408
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://mvn.com/nfl-jets/2007/09/12/penningtons-passing-analysis-week-1/

     
  2. Scikotic

    Scikotic Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    11,408
    Likes Received:
    0
    (CONTINUED...)

    http://mvn.com/nfl-jets/2007/09/12/penningtons-passing-analysis-week-1/

     
  3. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    I read your full analysis on the site and it was pretty accurate. the point about Chad's mechanics being off is not right though. His mechanics are perfect for what he is trying to do, which is to mainly dump off little touch passes underneath the coverage.

    He really has always done this and it's one of the reasons he's so accurate on the run, he really does not need to set himself to throw the ball.

    He also gets minimal velocity on many of his throws because he does not have his body involved at all except from the shoulder up. This is the main reason that he's never going to be a very effective NFL QB against good defenses. Good defenses laugh at the theory that he is so good at executing.
     
  4. Beamen

    Beamen New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    Messages:
    9,902
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's a nice little analysis, but you know all it's going to do is stir up the Penny v Clemens debate....

    Very few of your grades there that I can argue with, although I could be picky and give a lot of the average plays that you gave a B+ a C+... I say that because a lot of those are the passes that Pennington made well, but he forewent other, higher-risk, higher-reward options for....
     
  5. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    He deserves an "F". When you are down by 3 or 4 touchdowns the entire game, dinks are as useless as (fill in your own useless phrase here).
     
  6. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    It's not 3 or 4 TD's that they are useless against, it's 9+ pts.

    To get a team back in the game from 2 scores down you really need to be able to march the ball up the field when the defense is primed and waiting for you to try to do that.

    That doesn't mean that a strong-armed QB, say Vinny in his prime, can march up the field at will, however those guys can stretch the field out in a way that the defense has to account for every inch in it's game planning.

    When was the last time we saw a team lay back in a 3 deep zone when the Jets were down a couple of scores in the second half? 2001? Nobody needs to lay back against Chad because he doesn't make them defend the area 20+ yards beyond the line of scrimmage at all. When he does complete a 30+ yard pass, and we've all seen him do that a few times a season, he is routinely throwing at single coverage, because there's no need to double his receivers with the usual safety deep and cornerback on the man.

    You must make teams respect the entire field on defense or they'll just cut your string sooner or later and you wind up kicking a field goal when you really needed 7.
     
  7. Attackett

    Attackett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    5,512
    Did you even watch the game? He was down 3 TDs once and took the team down the field for a TD. He was never on the field down 4 TDs..

    Good job Scikotics..
     
  8. johnny

    johnny Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,857
    Likes Received:
    592

    Don you just must not have been watching another game. The Jets were never down by 4 touchdowns in the game (considering they lost by 24 points and the Pats scored the last 10 points). And while Pennington was in the game the only reason they were down by threee TD's (for one series - not the entire game) was because of the KR TD and the fact that after Chad got injured the Pats scored another TD. When he got back after his injury Pennington came back and lead the Jets to another TD drive to be only trailing by 14.

    OF course, there is no sense in letting facts get in the way of preconcieved notions. I'm sorry but IMHO a person that objectively gives Pennington an "F" is out there on an island.

    Just as when another poster claimed that Chad has never looked good against the Ravens when he has in fact never played the Raven this post proves that some people will resort to anything to try and make a point.
     
  9. NYJets38

    NYJets38 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,938
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good, interesting read.

    Who is this guy? Was he watching on TV, or the coaches film?

    I'm just wondering, if on some of those plays he actually saw receivers open downfield. Can't tell that on TV.

    And I absolutely agree about his mechanics being what keeps him from getting great velocity. He worked on them before last season, and early in the year he was throwing the ball great. Better than I've ever seen him throw it.

    They seem to have gone back to more just arm throwing now though.
     
  10. GreenMachine

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    12,528
    Likes Received:
    6
    Nice job Sci!

    Good to see perspective from someone who has played the postion at more than a HS level...
     
  11. Scikotic

    Scikotic Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    11,408
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree that he has perfectly fine mechanics for his dump-offs, but I think its quite obvious that he struggles on the deeper routes, especially outs and hitches that are 15+ yards.

    If Penny wants to be able to makes these passes without scrutiny, or any CB jumping the routes, he needs to learn how to use him legs and torso to develop some more velocity, because throwing all arm just wont do, as we are all aware of

    Comon Don, I think we can all agree that scoring 14 points in 2 and a half quarters, against the Pats no less, is very deserving of a B grade.

    Pennington didn?t let the Jets down, the defense let the Jets down. Just keeping it real

    Well damn, if I?m supposed to be playing QB for some college team, let me know?I think I could put it down like no other?:smile:

    GM, I thought we have been through this a few times over?the name on the article and whoever you may think I am?well the names just don?t match up :shit:

    On a side note, if KC starts this week, which it is looking like more and more each day, then I will analyze KC next week. Starter, or the QB that gets more play deserves the breakdown?
     
  12. ScotsJet

    ScotsJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would have been an interesting addition to note the amount of time Chad had on the completions - that reads as though he wasn't actually hurried as much as it seemed in real time...
     
  13. Quack

    Quack New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Penny has never looked bad against the Ravens, either. He's undefeated against the Ravens, too.
     
  14. AlioTheFool

    AlioTheFool Spiveymaniac

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,601
    Likes Received:
    0
    Haven't you learned yet that facts are unacceptable defenses of Pennington's skill? :wink:
     
  15. Jets81

    Jets81 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,445
    Likes Received:
    4,067
    Amen. How anyone can get down on Pennington for his performance in week one is mind blowing. The guy played the kind of football that he's always seemed to, making good reads, using short efficient passes, and moving the sticks. Whether or not people like his style they should respect the fact that he did his job. There's something seriously wrong when people would rather bash Pennington for a shortcoming he has when it probably didn't even matter in the game in question.

    Pennington was having a good game, no reason to believe that he couldn't have lead the team to another score if the game was still in question. It wasn't though, because our defense was horrible and ST's blew it. Where are the threads on the D-line?

    Is it that much easier to shaft Pennington then it is to tear apart the defense for the lack of pressure they got on Brady all day? How about some heat for Mangini for installing a system that we don't really have the personnel for? What about Tannenbaum letting a veteran difference maker on the O-line go over a paltry million dollars, then re-negotiating with a guy who probably wouldn't start on 2/3 of the rest of the teams in the NFL? Why not take it a step further and question the Revis pick? Was our secondary that much worse then our D-line heading into the offseason?
     
  16. Scikotic

    Scikotic Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    11,408
    Likes Received:
    0
    great idea, I'll try that out next week for KC
     
  17. Jets18

    Jets18 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2003
    Messages:
    571
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thougth after he got hurt his arm looked a little stronger for some reason. If you look at the Penny from 02- to know I think his mechanics are really screwed up.
     
  18. Scikotic

    Scikotic Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    11,408
    Likes Received:
    0
    This sucks, but what are ya gonna do?


    If anyone has any recommendations or requests for this week, please let me know so I can accommodate them by Wednesday
     

Share This Page