These are three different posts that all miss the point. I don't care what happened in 2012, I'm a season-ticket holding fan of course I'm going to root for the to win, and of course it's a good thing Smith has looked competent in OTAs. The point is that the original post was smarmy and sarcastic, implying that taking a guy in the 4th when he was a projected 6th is completely justified because of solid OTAs.
It was definitely smarmy. Spiking the football over some summer practices where they run around in shorts and mocking TGG posters as "experts" with an LOL to boot also smarmy is a great word
Your post didn't imply anything you wanted to convey. The post above has done that job though, shame you didn't just say that in the first place.
I'm just trying to figure out how "experts" were wrong about something with nothing but voluntary OTAs to base your opinion on.
This IS a very definition of "onomatopoeia for dbaggery". You are obsessing over a statement that (verbatum) it was not a bad thing to have good OTA showing for a 4th round pick most "experts" thought was over drafted. Yes, a pointless post by you to say the least, and it keeps on getting worse. I understand there is nothing to talk about, but you are taking this to a new low.
As a gunner, absolutely agree. Although, I wouldn’t mind seeing what he can do on KR. Not something he did at UGA but he rocked it in high school.
