Allen Lazard takes pay cut to $2.25M base salary to remain with the Jets

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Borat, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:22 AM.

  1. LAJet

    LAJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    9,700
    Likes Received:
    12,832
    We need to draft a number #2 and see what last year rookie can do with a competent O staff that schemes to the players strength. With AR very few players saw the field.
     
  2. Borat

    Borat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2018
    Messages:
    5,989
    Likes Received:
    9,302
    I too would take Slayton for the same price. But he got 3 years, 36 mil guaranteed. Lazard got 2 mil guaranteed. I am taking Lazard at his price rate over Slayton at his 100 out of 100 times. And if we did get Slayton, we would still have GW and a bunch of scrubs.
     
    Jets79 and JetFanInPA like this.
  3. JetFanInPA

    JetFanInPA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Messages:
    11,502
    Likes Received:
    4,233
    At that price and given the state of the receiver room, it's reasonable. He has some pretty bad hands, but he also made some big plays, is experienced as a starter, and was better with Rodgers. He gets a lot of hate, but this makes sense
     
  4. Jets79

    Jets79 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2020
    Messages:
    3,314
    Likes Received:
    6,377
    Right…I agree

    Problem is for us he is our WR2 right now
     
  5. Jets79

    Jets79 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2020
    Messages:
    3,314
    Likes Received:
    6,377
    Agreed…the contracts make that the decision…I was just saying if the money were similar, I’d prefer Slayton all day long
     
    Borat likes this.
  6. LAJet

    LAJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    9,700
    Likes Received:
    12,832
    Agree. I responded to that on a separate thread. We will draft one or two and also see what we have with our last year rookie which was given zero chance by the previous regime.
     
    Jets79 likes this.
  7. SOJAZ

    SOJAZ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2015
    Messages:
    2,036
    Likes Received:
    2,556
    Blocking, blocking , blocking... that is why they kept him.
     
  8. tomdeb

    tomdeb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,438
    Likes Received:
    3,175

    My opinion only, but I think this signing means the jets will look at TE, DT, and RT before WR in draft.
    Now I would be real surprised if Tet McMilllian went in rd.1 to jets.
    The jets will get another WR in the draft, but now it will be day 2 at the earliest.
     
    LAJet likes this.
  9. Jets79

    Jets79 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2020
    Messages:
    3,314
    Likes Received:
    6,377

    LOL…my immediate reaction:

    Let’s hope it’s not a Second Round WR!!!!!

    We ONLY draft BUST WRs in the 2nd round
     
    tomdeb likes this.
  10. LAJet

    LAJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    9,700
    Likes Received:
    12,832
    Yes indeed, a team that really wants to emphasize and prioritize the running game retains a very good blocking receiver at a bargain price. Go figure. It almost seems too logical to be a Jets move.
     
  11. Nyjets4eva

    Nyjets4eva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,712
    Likes Received:
    1,304
    Still need another playmaker at WR. Can we get one in round 2/3? And who do yall like
     
  12. LAJet

    LAJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    9,700
    Likes Received:
    12,832
    Agree completely, although not much depth on this draft from what I read.
     
  13. BrowningNagle

    BrowningNagle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    28,205
    Likes Received:
    29,430
    uhh no they kept him cause nobody wanted to trade for him

    if anybody offered anything he’d be out of here in a NY minute
     
  14. LAJet

    LAJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    9,700
    Likes Received:
    12,832
    I believe it was a great move, they kept him because at this cost he has more value than releasing him, he is a decent WR3 for the money, and even makes a potential future trade more feasible, while reducing our cap.
     
  15. BrowningNagle

    BrowningNagle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    28,205
    Likes Received:
    29,430
    oh I’m glad he took the pay cut for sure
     
    LAJet likes this.

Share This Page