We didn't watch all of it, but the 15 minutes or so my wife watched actually turned her a bit towards him (and she is very anti-Trump).
I thought he came off pretty well. He was hypocritical on his stances for abortion and gay marriage - on one he said the supreme court made it's decision and on the other he suggested the supreme court decision would change. Aside from that he seemed pretty humble and reasonable.
I thought it was pretty obvious the man is flying by the seat of his pants. I watched the interview hoping to see a guy that was taking the job serious with a plan and I came away more concerned than I was previously: -Mostly vague nonsense answers to tough questions. -In regards to the middle east "I dont want to give away any plans to our enemies" Yeah, okay jerk off. He said he's going to trust the generals but then refused to walk away from the idea that he knows more than the Generals....!!!!!! -He was asked if he's going to stop tweeting like a teenager now that he's the leader of the world and he couldn't say no. -When asked about the asshole fringe racist trump people out there: "I'll tell them to please stop it, if I can." (a real leader outright says there is no place for that nonsense in his country) -He was asked why if he's going to end lobbying and special interests his team is full of lobbyists. And he says" because that's the only people out there" oh but he said some nice things about the President. That's because the president is a nice, genuine guy. That doesn't change my view of Trump just stating the obvious instead of years of making up stuff about the guy
I cringed really hard when his wife spoke. I know a lot will say she's hot (I don't see it) and because of that nothing else matters but the way she spoke about things will make me miss Michelle Obama. I'm not trying to be mean, it's just what I took from the interview. She seems weak and almost like an air head. Also I couldn't take her seriously when she said she wanted to focus on bullying while she's sitting next to a man who does just that. Her response to him was weak sauce. As for trump it was an OK interview. Nothing loud and insanely stupid as most are use to from him. He still has trouble being coherent though.. Lastly, Ivanka is the best trump. Always a favorite of mine. Sent from my BLU LIFE ONE X using Tapatalk
His wife is definitely an airheaded gold digger but I dont really care about the wife, just the guy leading the country and yikes that was weak. I did come away wishing Ivanka was the one we elected president though out of the whole group. In fact she answered one question so well her dad tried to copy it and make it his words.
Since it turns out to not have been photoshopped it will be interesting to hear what President ''grab em by the pussy'' Trump has to say about it. Sent from my BLU LIFE ONE X using Tapatalk
all of my opinions on this website have been paid for by George Soros. You are trolling badly for free
Pats fans must be in a corner, sucking their thumbs and babbling incoherently. They're in one of the most liberal parts of the country, but their idols Bill and Tom supported Trump.
Exactly, if popular vote mattered they would spend their resources completely different and in turn the outcomes of the election would be different. I am happy that one demographic in the country cannot overrule the rest of the country.
For the same reason people keep bringing up the super delegates. They think it's some artificial contrivance that overrides the true will of the majority. Hard to argue that it isn't. Just as hard to argue that it makes any difference whatsoever. Everybody knew the rules going in. If they don't like the rules, that's fine, it changes nothing.
I don't think that's entirely true. Civil unrest can cause serious change in government, even if it's caused by a mob of selfie-enthusiasts and riot-minded window shoppers like the ones currently taking the streets in major American cities. And the liberal media (which, according to most liberals is the only non-tabloid media in existence) has been very successful at telling those people what to think and why to be upset and take more selfies. I can see the electoral college replaced with a different system in a couple of election cycles by something equally as ineffective, just not the popular vote. Because if there's anything most politicians likely agree on, no matter the party, it's that the opinions of the people they rule is completely irrelevant.
