The real issue with how our front 7 is constructed

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by GangGreenBlues, Nov 5, 2015.

  1. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    I don't see it that way. I think having those 2 guys as 3-4 DEs is complete overkill, as while they will have good individual seasons, that approach doesn't really utilize their abilities to their fullest potential. It's like paying for 2 ferraris to haul a trailer. All a 3-4 D-Lineman needs to do is eat up blocks and space and allow the talented linebackers behind them to make plays. We don't actually have talented linebackers behind them, and even if we did, we still wouldn't need all that talent up front to free them up, so we are wasting all that talent, and will be wasting a lot of money if we resign several of them in the future.

    What we should've done, in my personal opinion, last offseason, is trade Wilkerson for a first round pick, and use our first round pick and that one to draft a couple of speedy pass rushing DEs/OLBs, then switch to a 4-3, with Richardson at 3-technique, Snacks at NT, and the 2 ends on the outside applying pressure. Obviously, we would ve still had to nail the picks and all that, so it's not a guaranteed thing by any means, but that approach conceptually makes more sense to me, rather than stockpiling uber talented D-Linemen in a 3-4.
     
  2. jetsclaps

    jetsclaps Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,568
    Likes Received:
    982
    I'm sure the coaching staff never thought about this.
     
  3. Footballgod214

    Footballgod214 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    15,252
    Likes Received:
    6,106
    Problem is with 100,000 other things a HC deals with on a daily basis he probably thought about his as long as it took you and me to read it. Playbooks and installs are done in Training Camp, and it seems every team struggles with changing ANYTHING once the season starts.
     
  4. Zach

    Zach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    2,304
    You don't even specify what kind of 3-4 system Jets should have tried. Think very hard about it for good year or two - and then maybe [just MAYBE] some idea will dawn on you.

    Having 2 capable 3-4 DE is a starting point for potent 3-4 defense system, not an overkill.
     
  5. jerseyjay14

    jerseyjay14 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    5,138
    Likes Received:
    1,115
    watching the film on NFL replay the reason stands out like a sore thumb.

    no one is winning their 1 on 1 matchups. not when we rush 4, not when we blitz. not the big guys on lineman, not the backers or secondary guys on backs and tight ends. the only time guys are getting through is when we get a free rusher. there have been a handful of times somebody one their matchup, but the amount of time guys are getting stone walled is alarming.

    sure an edge rusher would help a ton. but guys really need to start looking in the mirror as well. high picks being paid high money but not winning their 1 on 1s very often
     
  6. BrowningNagle

    BrowningNagle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    28,494
    Likes Received:
    29,750
    Wilkerson has been winning his 1 on 1s. That doesn't change the fact that this team needs an edge rusher (like a lot of teams) but let's not lie about Wilkerson. He has been playing well.

    The rookie Leonard Williams has struggled the last couple weeks
     
    Jonathan_Vilma likes this.
  7. Footballgod214

    Footballgod214 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    15,252
    Likes Received:
    6,106
    Leonard will probably continue to struggle as he hits the rookie wall. He played like his hair was on fire the first few weeks. Now reality is setting in!
     
  8. Jonathan_Vilma

    Jonathan_Vilma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    33,983
    Likes Received:
    33,147
    I agree, they both need snaps. Relentlessness in getting to the quarterback goes a long way in these league. Look at Terrell Suggs and Dumervil. They're not gifted athletes in terms of measurable or speed, but they display the fact that they will live and die trying to get to the quarterback. Dumervil is 5'11" with short arms for christs sake although he does have better pass rush moves than Suggs. While Suggs has refined his arsenal as he's been in the league longer, he came into the league as a raw effort player.

    Coples doesn't really have that drive, and Pace doesn't really have the skillset or stamina for it anymore. We need to throw some youth into our linebacker core. You can live with that knowing the younger guys need to make an impression to keep getting snaps.

    It's starting to piss me off when we keep throwing the old dogs out there and the results are the same. Not that Coples or Davis are old, but Coples isn't productive and Davis makes the same mistakes in not tackling and over pursuing on every rush that isn't an A gap dive play. It's too easy for runningbacks. Run away from Harris, pick him off with an interior lineman and gain the edge with confidence that the running back will make Davis miss with a simple cutback.

    Damon Harrison also needs to be taken off the field in passing situations. It's painful seeing him barely move a yard off the line of scrimmage in pass rushing situations. There were articles all season in him wanting to be given a chance to pass rush. He's been given enough time and he gets no push. Time to line up Wilk/Richardson/Williams and either Reilly/Mauldin and even Coples off the edge. Hell go with a 3 man rush and send Harris. Something needs to give as the pass rush has been atrocious since the first half of the New England game.
     
  9. Jonathan_Vilma

    Jonathan_Vilma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    33,983
    Likes Received:
    33,147
    It's a simple formula though, make sure you double Wilk or chip him with a back because he's the only threat in the pass game thus far outside of a Richardson sack when Brady broke the pocket. Someone needs to step up.

    I anticipate Williams is going to struggle a bit with conditioning from here on out in a down to down basis. He said it himself that he wasn't in good enough shape at the beginning of the year. That's OK as that will come as he progresses in this league and I fully expect him to develop into an excellent player. For now, his snaps need to be more limited on early downs IF we can sub Douzable or another hog in and still stop the run effectively so that Williams can be at full strength in pass rushing situations.
     
  10. Jonathan_Vilma

    Jonathan_Vilma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    33,983
    Likes Received:
    33,147
    That's what's frustrating about everyone calling for an edge rusher like we haven't been trying. It's one of the most premium positions in the NFL.

    There were 18 players in the league with double digit sacks last year. Two were interior rushers (Watt, Dareus) and the other was Clay Matthews playing an inside linebacker/outside linebacker hybrid, so that leaves 15 pure edge rushers with double digit sacks. It's an incredibly hard position to draft for because the majority of these players are going to struggle early in their careers when they're facing 320 pound tackles every snap that have ten times the quick feet than they faced in college.

    EDIT: sorry for the triple post it's a pain in the ass to quote everyone and reply in the same post.
     
  11. PabloJa

    PabloJa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    716
    But how about them punters? Wouldn't you use a pick or two to replace Quigs?
    [​IMG]
     
  12. PabloJa

    PabloJa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    716
    Who'd take Demario Davis spot? It's not sarcasm, it's a real question, with whom would you replace him? Henderson? Lattimore? They're old too.
     
  13. jdon

    jdon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,481
    Likes Received:
    527

    I am coming to the conclusion that Davis is just no good. But wouldn't the coaches see that?
     
  14. LAJet

    LAJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    9,830
    Likes Received:
    13,014
    Probably right, or a free agency move.
     
  15. matt robinson 17

    matt robinson 17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,158
    Likes Received:
    8,027
    There's about 50 college teams that have a better punter than us
     
  16. LongIslandBlitz

    LongIslandBlitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2011
    Messages:
    13,325
    Likes Received:
    4,083
    The real problem lies with the linebackers not the front 4....We don't have any skilled linebackers when it comes to pass rushing ability.The front 4 can open up plenty of holes for the linebackers to get thru but look who's back there,Coples,Pace,Harris and Davis.Davis has the speed and is a solid tackler but doesn't have great pass rushing ability.If we had even one stud linebacker it could change everything
     
  17. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    :eek: What? What kind of drugs have you been on the past few weeks?
     

Share This Page