If not Branch...Pinkston?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by danaaprildarren, Sep 1, 2006.

  1. danaaprildarren

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    2
    If the price is too high and nothing can be worked out for Branch, what do you guys think of picking up Todd Pinkston?
     
  2. lightning

    lightning Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1
    Nnnnnoooooooooooo waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay
     
  3. Big Poppa Naich

    Big Poppa Naich Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,816
    Likes Received:
    2
    i like who we have better. branch has scissor syndrome...
     
    #3 Big Poppa Naich, Sep 1, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 9, 2005
  4. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    ... (filler)
     
  5. lightning

    lightning Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1
    Way too many things to worry about. Injured all the time.
     
  6. Phyr

    Phyr Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    866
    Likes Received:
    0
    In Madden, a lot of punters and kickers have a higher strength rating.
     
  7. deviljets7

    deviljets7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,536
    Likes Received:
    319
    I think Pinkston is a scrub, but if signing him would allow them to deal McCareins for a 3rd or 4th rounder its a move I'd probably do.
     
  8. baamf

    baamf Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,989
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd personally stick with what we have before going down that route....
     
  9. Kris 15

    Kris 15 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    16,735
    Likes Received:
    1,499
    Len Pasquarelli approves.
     
  10. SouthBayJetsfan4life

    SouthBayJetsfan4life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    119
    Pinkston is brittle..HAS NO HEART and did I mention, he sucks.

    I'd sooner want Freddie Mitchell.
     
  11. jdjets

    jdjets New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    0
    let me think about that. are you people crazy? no way in hell!
     
  12. King Koopa

    King Koopa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Messages:
    4,425
    Likes Received:
    3,054
    hey, if not filet mignon, why not a plate full of shit?
     
  13. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    we do NOT NEED a receiver. I'm heading to the bunker before I get sick.
     
  14. baamf

    baamf Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,989
    Likes Received:
    0
    You don't believe that we can upgrade the current talent we have at the position? I personally don't believe Pinkston is an upgrade, but there is no way I consider this an elite group the way it is currently constructed. Can we stick with it all year? Probably, but if a deal comes along that upgrades the position IMO you do it....
     
  15. jfhjr71

    jfhjr71 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2003
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    1

    LOL...that was a perfect quote
     
  16. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    Yes we could certainly upgrade our receiving corps. Do I think our receivers suck or are below average? No.

    My point is that we have other positions that are far worse off than receiver on this team right now and upgrading there shouldn't be a priority. It seems to me that this thread was created with the idea that we NEED to upgrade our receiving corps.

    If a reasonable deal comes along that can upgrade our team at any position, why not? The Branch deal is not reasonable, and as you already said, Stinkston wouldn't be an upgrade.
     
  17. Learn To Swim

    Learn To Swim 2008 Nightowltom "Best Non-Jets Poster" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2004
    Messages:
    5,596
    Likes Received:
    1
    #17 Learn To Swim, Sep 1, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 9, 2005
  18. JetFanInPA

    JetFanInPA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Messages:
    11,501
    Likes Received:
    4,233
    Calm down folks, the thread starter is clearly kidding... Right?

    Come on now this guy has the worst set of stonehands in pro-football. Plus he's injury-prone and afriad to go over the middle.

    Yeah, he'll help the recieving core. :rolleyes:
     
  19. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    We don't need a mediocre receiver. We have McCareins, Cotchery, Smith, Dwight, and Newhouse all on the roster, and they all fit that bill. Pinkston would just be another one of them. We need a playmaker at receiver. We don't need another body. We have enough warm bodies there. We just need a warm body who can play damn well.
     
  20. jonnyd

    jonnyd 2007 TGG.com Funniest Poster Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    13,035
    Likes Received:
    2,585


    lolol i dont know if branch is filet mignon but I get the point....good shit
     

Share This Page