I would agree with this move. The difference in the scenario expressed is we will still have the 16th overall pick.
I agree with your assessment. The purpose of discussion is that we have no idea what is going to happen, and what ever rumblings are provided are calculated by the front office. There are a lot of older veterans that will cost too much. Urbik will be on the cheap, and is more versatile than most in the free agency market. I agree with you on pick up our free safety. I want Phillip Thomas out of syracuse. I like Tommy Steeter in the 5th for WR.
Moore played some Right Tackle for the New York Jets last year, if I remember correctly. If Urbik takes a step back, and isn't any good than we waste a 3rd round pick. That is the risk you take. He will sign a 3-4 year deal so he won't be with this team for just 1 year if he plays well. I appreciate your opinion, and would stress that nothing is a 0/100% in the NFL. I would wager that they have looked into. Weather or not it happens....Well that is the purpose of a discussion board. Based on your argument of their line. They passed the 10th most times in the league last year. (10% more than last year) We are going to throw short. I can only hope that Sanchez get rid of the ball faster.
Streeter will go earlier based purely on measureables and potential. Thomas is likely going in the 4th-5th. I would bet he isnt there when we pick in the 5th, and there is no way he will be worth the 3rd round selection we have (96?) But thats purely because of the poor safety class, not because Thomas would be worth that slot in a normal year. He would be lucky to be a 6th round pick if he came out in next years safety class. Next year is the year to draft safeties
There are reports that the Redskins are looking into Thomas in the 3rd round. Mike Mayock has him as the 5th best safety in the draft. http://bmitchlive.wordpress.com/2012/03/27/will-syracuse-saftey-phillip-thomas-join-the-redskins/ I am just basing Streeter's evaluation from some prospect ranking sites, and I would agree you are probably right.
If Moore could effectively play tackle, they would of played him there last year, and stuck hunter/ducasse @ guard. Moore is no RT. So this move doesnt make sense
Right guard is more important than Right tackle. We had no one to play guard when Moore moved out, and is why they moved him back in.
depending on how the draft turns out they might be taking RT in the 1st 2nd or 3rd i don't see them using a 3rd for a center when they will be drafting one likely at some point plus there are FAs OTs out there that can be signed that won't cost a pick and at least have shown they can play OT in the NFL
Im still not recalling ever putting Moore @ RT It doesnt make any sense Moores not athletic enoughl to be a tackle
The only reason the Bills gave up fewer sacks is because Tanny has failed in his job of getting the New York Fucking Football Jets a god damn pass rusher.
The Bills ran a spread offense using primarily 3 step drops to minimize the poor OT play. The interior of the Bills OL is solid, especially when Wood plays center (he's had injury issues). Fitzpatrick, unlike Sanchez, can read defenses well, can make presnap reads, and gets rid of the ball quickly. Between the offensive schemes and better QBing, the Bills didn't give up a lot of sacks. However, that kind of scheme limits their playbook. If the Jets had a better QB than Sanchez, they'd give way fewer sacks, too.
Not on a permanent basis, but they did move him out occasionally. I could be wrong, but I am sure I remember seeing him.
