http://uk.sports.ign.com/articles/724/724760p1.html these ratings are weird they added in a lot of new categories...example:zone coverage, elusiveness, spin something its weird and they rated andre dyson the same as justin miller i dont know about that
Thanks for the link. Anyone know if these look like what will be released as final? I think the ratings are way too high for way too many players. There are too many guys with 90+ ratings. In my opinion, those should be reserved for each team's truly elite players. I kinda like the new rating dimensions, though- spin, elusiveness, etc.
I wouldn't say the ratings are too bad. Dyson played injured for almost the entire year, and played very few games healthy (see Philly vs. Seattle Monday Night game). As for the rating, I think that is reasonable, although they might have rated Miller too high. Rhodes is way too low and Coleman's is way too high. Same thing with Graham. They also don't have Eric Smith and James Dearth.
Who cares , lol ? I think kerry rhodes is just about right, stop the homerism. What has he done ? If he plays well during the season it will show during the updates.
here we go the real deal.....hmm......wow......don't know about you guys but I'll only use the nyj in franchise, this team is pretty horrible. I disagree with rhodes, dyson, a.jones,cedric houston (cmon 85 speed ?!?!)....well at least it'll be a challenge in franchise mode.
kellen clemens not bad. It will be an utter waste to even think about using chad. 83 ? F*** you Ea. That means user pick galore, ill be using clemens, when i play online.
