New York Jets to cut Faneca....per NJ.com

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Matty Jets, Apr 24, 2010.

  1. Matty Jets

    Matty Jets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,620
    Likes Received:
    131
    #1 Matty Jets, Apr 24, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2010
  2. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm hoping this is a Brandon Moore type of deal (re-sign him for less)....otherwise I don't like this. I'm well aware his play has dropped off but still
     
  3. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    Due 9 million dollars each of the next 2 years....it is the right move.

    They must have some confidence in Slauson as well.
     
  4. Petey

    Petey Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    44
    Just saw that. Interesting...
     
  5. illmatic

    illmatic New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. Matty Jets

    Matty Jets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,620
    Likes Received:
    131
    I'm all for this type of move. Is Faneca?
     
  7. Poeman

    Poeman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    14,469
    Likes Received:
    8,252
    whoaaa...will SNY pick this up right now

    Faneca is a key player, but he has been bitching about thomas jones alot. Although he is a good player he is due like $7.5 million
     
  8. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    He is like a 96 in Madden this is a huge mistake.
     
  9. egelband

    egelband Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,440
    Likes Received:
    256
    if that were the case i think it would be announced in a different way...i guess.
     
  10. pender30

    pender30 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    18
    That's pretty gutsy. Is Ducasse really the guy who will step in or is somebody else on the roster the guy?
     
  11. BleedingGreen55

    BleedingGreen55 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    981
    Likes Received:
    112
    This from an earlier thread.....
     
  12. talisaynon

    talisaynon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    216
    Fuck him. Uwilling to restructure 8 million bones a year? Fuck him and his overrated ass.
     
  13. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    $7.5 million in new money, but still...too much.

    What I don't understand, however, is that he's essentially a $2 million player this season...that's the difference between the amount of guaranteed money left on his contract and his salary number. He's not worth keeping for $2 million more than it costs to cut him?

    Did we really seek out every possible trade option before this decision? Seriously? Why do it now? Why cut him DURING the draft? This makes no sense, and I have my doubts.

    They'd better have some confidence in Slauson, as you said.
     
  14. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah it is a little strange, but I trust Callahan to make the right moves regarding the O-Line.
     
  15. Keeper1125

    Keeper1125 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    1
    Folks, this has nothing to do with money. Faneca was mediocre at best last season, and he's only going to decline.
     
  16. Rockefella

    Rockefella Trolls

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    0
    By cutting him does that give us more spending money on free agents?
     
  17. LockDown24

    LockDown24 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    3,557
    Likes Received:
    15
    This is a bad move. Why break up the chemistry on the best offensive line in the NFL? I really hope this isn't true, Slausen needs another year before he can start and Ducasse is just a project based on every scouting report I've read. Faneca is still one of the best run blockers in the league and our offense is still run first. I understand that the deal makes fiscal sense, but it will come back to haunt us.
     
  18. illmatic

    illmatic New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    This cut can't be about money...while i understand we have a 'budget' it is an uncapped year...i mean seriously the reason needs to be football related otherwise its just pennywise and pound foolish
     
  19. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    not at all
     
  20. Keeper1125

    Keeper1125 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    1
    The notion of chemistry is overrated. It's something fans reflexively attribute to a quality unit, but it has nothing to do with "chemistry." It has to do with the quality of the players.

    The Jets had 4 excellent linemen last season and 1 below average one. They cut the below average one. This isn't hard.
     

Share This Page