Rookie Pool . . . $ $ $

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by kelly, May 5, 2006.

  1. kelly

    kelly Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,445
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jets | Team allocated rookie salary cap pool
    Thu, 4 May 2006 22:34:19 -0700

    Tom Silverstein, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports the National Football League allocated the New York Jets $6,631,295 million under the 2006 rookie salary cap pool, according to a source with access to NFL Players Association salary data.
     
  2. WayneChrebet

    WayneChrebet New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    1
  3. M00CHNESS

    M00CHNESS Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    0


    ....$6,631,295 million. That word million dont need to be in there. Shit everyone rememvers third grade. 6,631,295 automatically means 6 million. Maybe Im not seeing something?
     
  4. l3ol3o

    l3ol3o New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,719
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont really get the rookie allocation thing? Dont they count against the cap like any other player on the team? What am I missing?
     
  5. vilmatic

    vilmatic Active Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    12
    maybe we actually got $6,631,295,000,000,000
     
  6. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    But maybe we were actually granted $6,631,295,000,000. Sounds like the 3010 salary cap.
     
  7. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, that would be $6,631,295 billion...
     
  8. Anarcho Fukayama

    Anarcho Fukayama New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    0
    I bet Tannenbaum could still fit that under the cap.
     
  9. M00CHNESS

    M00CHNESS Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    0


    Fuck, too many numbers. Everything is numbers these days. Making my head hurt. They need to sign contracts drunk. Life would be alot more interesting. "Pennington signs 6yrs. $45.67 three boxes of no-name condoms and a constant tap of PBR and Keystone Light". Wouldnt that be awesome?
     
  10. jetman8094

    jetman8094 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,211
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah could someone please explain this.
     
  11. Mehl-56

    Mehl-56 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,471
    Likes Received:
    237

    Actually that's Trillion
     
  12. penny10jet

    penny10jet New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,322
    Likes Received:
    0
    Does anyone know what that means?
     
  13. F Miami

    F Miami Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,914
    Likes Received:
    5
    It's a million-billion dollars.
     
  14. jetman8094

    jetman8094 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,211
    Likes Received:
    0
    does anyone else think this thread is starting to look like a BS forum thread??
     
  15. Jollygreenjet

    Jollygreenjet Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,297
    Likes Received:
    0
    "That word million dont need to be in there."

    While I'm not the grammar police, I would expect someone knocking another person for adding the word "million", should learn how to use words in sentences?

    "Shit everyone rememvers third grade"

    Are you sure about that?

    "Maybe Im not seeing something"

    Obviously you didn't see how terrible your spelling is?

    Open mouth, insert foot!
     
  16. Mantana Soss

    Mantana Soss Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    9,480
    Likes Received:
    3
    [​IMG]
     
  17. Rambo13

    Rambo13 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    5,305
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here's the scoop. You have the rookie allocation pool and you are not allowed to sign all of your rookies to contracts totalling more than that. I believe it is for the first year because obviously Brick will use more than that for his contract. It isn't a problem to sign everyone to the limit of the allocation unless you mess up. I think last year the Rams drafted Richie Incognito and spent almost all of their rookie cap and couldn't give him a fair market contract.

    That's the jist of it though, you just have to limit your rookie spending to that amount in, I believe, the first year of their contracts.

    I guess the basic premise is that the union doesn't want most of the money going to the rookies. They want it going to the vets who have accrued service in the league.
     
  18. stinkyB

    stinkyB 2009 Best Avatar Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    13,726
    Likes Received:
    12,229
    Which is better for the league. Not only do Vets get their due (fan familiarity) all the cash won't go to unproven BUST rookies. A few bad draft picks could cripple a franchise for a few years. (wasted cap space)
     
  19. SuppaMan

    SuppaMan New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't even understand why there is a thread on this. Does it really matter how much the NFL tells the team can spend on their draft picks. Not really, and it isn't a source of great discussion either (as we can all obviously see in this thread).
     
  20. Jollygreenjet

    Jollygreenjet Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,297
    Likes Received:
    0

    It really pisses me off when people have nothing better to do then jump on someones case for something so stupid.

    If you have nothing good to add to the topic, then don't say anything at all. sheesh!

    By the way Mantana, funny pick, thats gotta hurt, cup or no cup! lmao
     

Share This Page