clayton on Mike and Mike

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by browningnagle8, Apr 25, 2006.

  1. browningnagle8

    browningnagle8 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just on

    He stated that Titans Flyod Reese was leaning towards Vince Young at #3 although Chow and Fischer want Leinhart...

    Stated Jets are more intrested in Cutler more than Leinhart

    Clayton states that the Jets will try to trade with Raiders so that Raiders land Leinhart

    Jets will get D-brick at #7
     
  2. stinkyB

    stinkyB 2009 Best Avatar Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    14,029
    Likes Received:
    12,689
    If they can pick up another RD2 pick and still get D'Brick, that would be very good IMO.
     
  3. ny2dave

    ny2dave New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with you there.
     
  4. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    That would be unbelieveable. To get a top 5 talent at 7 along with a second rounder would be so impressive. I think that would be a great scenario for the Jets because if they can't strike a deal they can always take Leinart although it doesn't seem like they are too keen on his hollywood dreams.
     
  5. CMartinJET

    CMartinJET New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Messages:
    933
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thats too good to be true. D'Brick at 7. But couldn't you see it come draft day like the bills trading up to 6 giving like a 3rd rounder to the 49ers and drafting D'Brick one pick before us. Then you head Berman come on and say.. "Your not going to believe this but a cab driver told me they would do this!"
     
  6. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    I can't believe we would pass up on Matt Leinart. I know he is a BIT of a risk, but come one...this guys should be a real good QB in the NFL. I will be pretty sick for a long time if we pass on him.
     
  7. Jet Blue

    Jet Blue New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    0
    ONLY way I'd take Dabrick is in a trade down..

    he's not in Mario Williams class.... and is a bad fit for our line but, I'll take him Ughhhhhhh.
     
  8. Pride

    Pride New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Messages:
    2,059
    Likes Received:
    0
    Then at worst Vernon Davis would be the pick at #7:up:
     
  9. JetsFanAce51

    JetsFanAce51 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Vince Young I think would be a better fit for the Titans...you don't take a QB just because the offensive coordinator!!! Chow could be gone by next year, and then what??? They would be screwed...

    Cutler would play a lot better than Leinart in our stadium anyway...Cutler thrives in bad weather...

    If the Jets get D'Brick at #7 along with another pick, I wouldn't go crazy...I would only hate it if D'Brick was taken at #4 without getting an additional pick...that would be a total waste...as for # 7, we can get either D'Brick, Davis, or Hawk...one of them will be there...and after getting an additional draft pick from Oakland, we can get another solid player as well as having one of the top 7 guys, who all look really good as of right now...
     
  10. dabrowsk1

    dabrowsk1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,519
    Likes Received:
    7
    If the FO truly are targeting Brick/Williams, that would be risky. It might be worth it to get another second. But Brick is rated high on many draft boards, I don't think he would make it to 7. That is a tough call, I am not sure I would take that chance.
     
    #10 dabrowsk1, Apr 25, 2006
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2006
  11. akibud

    akibud Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,281
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can't see why anyone including the Jets would not think the 9'ers and Packers would not take Ferguson. They both could use a stud OL guy to protect their QB's just like us.
     
  12. alwaysbeenajetsfan

    alwaysbeenajetsfan New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    818
    Likes Received:
    0
    i would like to see the jets wait till draftday to make a move. you never know who could fal lto us, that we could miss out on
     
  13. CMartinJET

    CMartinJET New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Messages:
    933
    Likes Received:
    0

    Exactly nobody knows how high each player is on their draft board. My take is that they have D'Brick and Williams the same. Then you gauge how much a drop off in talent there is if you ended up with Hawk Ngata or Davis, if any at all.

    Bottom Line if there is a guy at 4 that you'll be killing yourselves if you let get away just take him and be done with it.
     
  14. MawaesDaMan

    MawaesDaMan New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2004
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would love to see the Jets trade down 3 spots and get another 2nd or 3rd, but why would the Raiders jump up? The packers and 49ers are not going QB, so why give up a pick and pay more for the same guy you can get at 7, unless someone else is trying to trade up with the GB/SF?

    Anyway, at 7, we still have a shot at D'Brick/Davis and other guys start to enter the discussion there as well, Huff/Ngata/Bunkley, maybe even Chad Jackson or Cutler.
     
    #14 MawaesDaMan, Apr 25, 2006
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2006
  15. Coach K

    Coach K New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,214
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hawk appears to be a lock for GB at 5 and Davis would be taken by the 49ers at 6. (nothing is guaranteed but i wouldnt imagine those teams passing on those players, unless GB feels desperate to reach for a WR at 5)

    i dont want Brick, but getting him at 7 plus a 2nd rder would seem nice. although i still prolly wouldnt want him at 7 :) sorry i want the best non Brick player available and then to take OL with 2 of the next 3 picks.

    thats just me though
     
  16. JetsIn2004

    JetsIn2004 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    11,912
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who is this Leinhart you speak of?
     
  17. JetsIn2004

    JetsIn2004 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    11,912
    Likes Received:
    0
    Because, if you're the Jets you tell the Raiders we're taking Leinart if you do not deal with us.....
     
  18. NY2MD_FS

    NY2MD_FS Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    8
    it's oakland, thats why. I personally wouldn't make the deal if we get a 3rd instead of a 2nd. Am sure they will do what's best for the team in the end. I am already preparing myself for the boos I will hear when LEINART is there at 4 and we trade the pick, you know it's coming.
     
  19. APK 8

    APK 8 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,923
    Likes Received:
    171

    I don't have a problem with Cutler, but to make this statement is simply over hyping the guy. What bad weather did Cutler ever thrive in? He played in the SEC. Alabama, Georgia and Florida get occasional rain, but nothing that would be like the Meadowlands in December.
     
  20. ny2dave

    ny2dave New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey, at least you're interested in doing something about the Oline.
     

Share This Page