Trading Down

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by GreenGreek, Apr 21, 2006.

?

What's the furthest we should trade down?

  1. Not at all. Trade up and get Bush or Leinart.

    6 vote(s)
    9.7%
  2. Not at all. Stay at #4 and draft Williams, Ferguson or Cutler.

    14 vote(s)
    22.6%
  3. 6)SF. They get an impact defensive player and we can get the QB of our choice(or Ngata/Davis).

    12 vote(s)
    19.4%
  4. 7) Oakland. We sacrafice the choice of QB, but can still come out with QB #3 or Ngata/Davis.

    9 vote(s)
    14.5%
  5. 8)Buffalo. They can get Ferguson if available, and we can still come out with QB #3 or Ngata/Davis.

    1 vote(s)
    1.6%
  6. 9) Detroit. They can get Hawk or a QB, and hopefully QB #3 or Ngata/Davis falls.

    6 vote(s)
    9.7%
  7. 10) Arizona. They can get a QB to back up Warner, and pick up Justice.

    7 vote(s)
    11.3%
  8. 17)Minn. They get a QB, & we get at least 2 extra 2nd rounders. Quantity > Quality.

    7 vote(s)
    11.3%
  1. GreenGreek

    GreenGreek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2002
    Messages:
    2,185
    Likes Received:
    547
    A lot of people have been in favor of trading down from #4, and some teams based on needs, could be interested in moving up. I'm just curious as to everyone's philosophy. Assuming we get fair value in the trade down, how far down is too far?
     
  2. Attackett

    Attackett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    5,512
    The lowest I would go is #9, only problem is I don't see any teams in the 5-9 range trying to move up to 4..
     
  3. Jet Blue

    Jet Blue New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    0


    Depends on how they value the QB's to how low we could go...

    But, dropping down to 11 PLUS adding another late 1st rounder sounds sweet - Grab whoever falls:

    Bush
    Mario
    Hawk
    Ferguson
    Ngata
    Davis
    Huff
    JUSTICE

    Young
    Lienart
    Cutler
     
  4. Nesquik

    Nesquik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    398
    The lowest is 6 gurateed to get either williams Hawk or Davis
     
  5. JVilma51

    JVilma51 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    595
    Likes Received:
    0
    if trading up and getting bush is an option how can you not?
     
  6. The Predator

    The Predator Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,816
    Likes Received:
    0
    definatly #6, we would get an extra pick, and pick up either vernon davis, aj hawk, vine young, or ngata
     
  7. NYjets2335

    NYjets2335 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    In order for us to trade up to the #1 spot to get bush it would cost at the very least our #4, #29 and #35. I do not wanna give up 3 picks for 1 player regardless of how amazing he is. We have too many holes to fill and we need those picks.
    I would like to trade down with san fran to get the #6 and the #22 pick from them. I wouldn't mind drafting:
    #6 Cutler
    #22 D. Willimas
    #29 Carpenter, Mcneil or Mangold
    #35 Max jean gilles

    Although I also wouldn't mind staying at #4 and taking Mario Williams or AJ Hawk either. I just don't wanna trade up thats all.
     
  8. Attackett

    Attackett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    5,512
    sure I'd love to trade the 4th pick to San Fran for their two first rounders also. I'd like to win the lottery too.. Who do you think SF is giving up two first rounders to move up 2 spots for?
     
  9. NYjets2335

    NYjets2335 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why do you think it's that hard to beleive, the giants gave 2 first rounders to get eli and move up 3 spots. It's all based on a point system man. They would have to give atleast that b/c they don't have a 2nd or 3rd rounder. If San Fran wants some player bad enough they will trade up to ensure they get him. They supposivly want AJ Hawk real bad, i think it's a stupid move on there part, but I won't complain if they go through with it.
     
    #9 NYjets2335, Apr 21, 2006
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2006
  10. Jet Blue

    Jet Blue New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    0

    OR:

    #6 Justice or Ngata
    #22 D. Williams
    #29 Carpenter, Mcneil or Mangold
    #35 Max jean gilles
     
  11. NYjets2335

    NYjets2335 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wouldn't mind that either, because we really do need a big DT like Ngata, but I wouldn't want to pick Justice simply because there is so much depth at tackle in this draft. But when your up this high in the draft and you have a chance to take a franchise qb you have to. I'm a huge pennington fan, he's my fav player on the team, but the realitity is that we need to rebuild our team, and rebuilding starts with a qb.
     
  12. Attackett

    Attackett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    5,512
    If you believe in the point system like you say, than I suggest you go and check the value chart to see how absurd this actually is. The 49ers would never give up both ones to move up to 4.
     
  13. NYjets2335

    NYjets2335 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    i'm not saying that the niners would do this, but this has been talked about on espn and by many people on this board. If the niners did want to move up that would really be there only option unless they decided to trade there 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th and i'm not sure if thats enough points.
     
  14. drnyjets

    drnyjets New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2006
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is to much talent at the top to drop out of the top ten picks. The farthest they should go is 9, and hopefully we could get Cutler or Huff in that position.
     
  15. Jtuds

    Jtuds Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,641
    Likes Received:
    1
    whoever says Cutler at 4 is crazy. Mosy people haev him going late top 10 or maybe after 10....if we are gonan draft him we oughta trade down....
     
  16. DROB63Cmart28

    DROB63Cmart28 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would try trading our 4th for the niners 6th and 22 this way we would have 3 1st rounders.
     
  17. luvdemjets1998

    luvdemjets1998 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oakland to me. They seem the most desperate and are willing to give anything for a top pick.
     

Share This Page