They have one of the better offenses in the league and they're going to be fighting KC for last place? You can't spin it both ways. You said Denver sucks. You got embarrassed by Denver. You can't now say they're good.
You'll have to forgive Scikotics, Jeaux...see, he didn't think you were that stupid....neither did the rest of us. I know you're not used to "intelligent thought" but that's essentially the rationale behind that assumption. If anybody...you should stay away from the prediction business...your predictions are as effective as a "one-legged man in an ass-kicking contest" for christ sakes.
The Oakland offense didn't do a damn thing until garbage time when the game was long over. If the Denver defense is so bad... 09:59 5:34 DEN 35 10 18 Fumble 00:09 2:31 OAK 17 5 21 Punt 09:55 2:22 OAK 20 3 3 Punt 04:21 2:37 OAK 17 6 23 Punt 00:26 0:26 OAK 17 1 -5 End of Half 15:00 4:35 OAK 20 8 42 Punt 08:23 1:53 OAK 17 3 -1 Punt
And yet, you were using the blowout against the Giants as evidence that the Raiders would be able to bounce back from this loss. Once again, Jeaux tries to have it both ways.
You need to look up the word numerous in the dictionary. If you think Cutler torched Asomugha numerous times than you obviously don't know the meaning of the word. Hey watching that Bronco game was hard to take, but its way too early to read anything in that early game. I remember in 1983 . Redskins really embarrassed Raiders in a early regular seasaon game, only to get embarrassed themselve later in the year in the superbowl . Raiders will get the Broncos the second time around.(retu8rn the favor and beat them at home)
In addition... ...Jeaux, your running game wasn't any better. Had Fargas not gotten that 42yd pickup with 3:42 left in the 4th quarter, then Fargas and McFadden (more Fargas) would've had pedestrian-like numbers. Take away that garbage time 42yd pick up and Fargas would've finished the game with 55yds on 17 carries. That's about 3.2 ypc. And Fargas/McFadden combined would've given the Raiders run offense to a whopping 101 yards on the ground.
some college psychology student could write their masters thesis on schizophrenia and use Jeaux as their test subject.
Damn, Denver is sneaky. Trying to have a good passing game. Don't they know that never works? You can't get away with a solid passing game for the whole season! Other teams always catch on to it! "What is he doing? OH MY GOD...is he THROWING the ball? What the...the ball is in the air. THE BALL IS IN THE AIR! We must adjust to this new development in the game of football!" I'm sure the Raiders won't let that whole "passing" thing sneak up on them again.
NO the point was The Gianht Defense looked like crap the first couple of games, but was a big part why they won a superbowl last year. Again look up stats oF Giant defense last year very early. (not good) The Point I making anyone that tries to form an opinion on this Raider defense after the first week is reaching for straws. This Raideer defense going to be very very good when everything is all said and done. Lets see when you can run the ball consistantly well + play very good defense+ Have very soft schedule= You should be right there for playoffs. One very bad game hasn't changed my mind one bit.
NO Just Raiders secondary too good, that eventually the creme always rise to the top. I don't think you will be seeing E Royal getting a ten yard cushion. Raiders will be right in his face( showi9ng Cutler what is the meaning of man to man coverage.
Again Denver passing offense is good. There defense is not very good. They are going to be fightijng with Kc for last place in AFc West. How is that spinning anything.
because if they have a good offense, that makes them better than the Raiders. That means the Raiders will be battling for last place, not the Broncos.
The Raiders suck and will continue to suck until Al Davis dies. They don't even have a head coach. What a joke.
