5 most expendable players/5 least expendable players on NYJ roster.

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by PennyandtheJets, Jun 22, 2008.

  1. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    you make some good points, Kurt. I don't mind Brad Smith...but i've seen him drop so many passes, i guess that makes him expendable in my eyes. Granted, he's learning a new position...so maybe we should cut him some slack....the upcoming season should be a good litmus test to see if should be a perennial "special teamer" or the 4th WR.
     
  2. The Dark Knight

    The Dark Knight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    27,177
    Likes Received:
    14,477
    Because he absolutely sucks. He is not good on gadget plays, people just say he is. All I watch is them flop. Seeing him behind center in NE just makes me sick. Maybe I should blame Schotty (which I do also), but Smith is horrible. Big let down.
     
  3. FUnny..b/c I saw him make quite a few plays for us in his first 2 years...he is VERY good after the catch..the very THREAT of him at gadget plays, and his spcial teams ability..IMO make him an asset. NOt a # 3 or better WR asset...but certainly a great situational guy.
     
  4. The Dark Knight

    The Dark Knight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    27,177
    Likes Received:
    14,477
    [​IMG]
    I don't know, it is like he got old or something. (Gadget play wise). Other teams figured him out. It is possible it could be turned around, I mean he was horrible, but the team was 4-12. He might not be the most expendable, but if he is going to perform in 08 like he did in 07, I would not miss him at all.
     
  5. Let's keep in mind that the guy was a 4th round gamble draft pick 2 years ago. I mean he was making the switch from being a spread option QB..to playing WR, running gadget plays and also doing special teams. Many option QB's come into the NFL underthe same circumstances and after their first TC we never hear from them again. Smith in his first 2 years has a handful of big plays offensively, has solidified himself as a great special teamer...and regardless of objective execution has given opposing DC's something additional to worry about.

    He still has a ton of time to develop...and to me...he has completely gone beyond alot of expectations. If he turns out to be nothing more than a #4 option YAC threat, and a good special teamer...I'll be thrilled.
     
  6. The Dark Knight

    The Dark Knight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    27,177
    Likes Received:
    14,477
    I see what you are saying and I agree with that. I was just responding to the question with a player of some significance. The real answer is 5 no names who won't make it past training camp.
     
  7. Joe Willie White Shoes

    Joe Willie White Shoes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Messages:
    8,145
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    I know you are trying to make a point, but this is pretty ridiculous. None of the top 3 QBs should be on an expendable list. Who is going to play QB? You?
     
  8. Tight

    Tight Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Messages:
    2,868
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bullshit. I cant remember anything of the top of my head where brad smith caught the ball in a game and did anything other then get tackled right after... Maybe he has the potential to be DEADLY after the catch but he has not shown me anything...

    Dont even get me started on these gadget plays that never ever work... ever

    I do agree on one thing we can do alot alot worse.

    You say he has a handful of big plays, that means 5 or less in 2 years.. Refresh my memory, I need one...
     
    #28 Tight, Jun 22, 2008
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2008
  9. penny10jet

    penny10jet New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,322
    Likes Received:
    0
    Most Expendable:
    1) Any of the three tight ends. It's pretty self explanatory. Baker, Keller, and Franks are all good players. We don't need three at a position that's not even on the field every play.

    2) Jesse Chatman. We have the every down back in TJ, the change of pace in leon, and the power, goalline back in Musa. What's Chatman?

    3) Bryan Thomas. Yes, it will be nice to have a rotation at OLB, but we now have three of our most highly paid players at OLB between Gholston, Pace, and Thomas. Plus, we already have good depth in Bowens.

    4) Chad Pennington/Kellen Clemmens. I'm a big believer in chemistry between a QB and their WRs. I'm not really sure who the better of the two is, but i'm pretty sure both of them would be better if the other one wasnt taking half their reps.

    5) Erik Coleman. He's now a backup to a guy who was the Cowboy's trash.


    Least expendable:

    1) D'brick. No depth to replace him. Hardest position in the league to find outside of QB.

    2) Revis. Shutdown corners are hard to come by, and he has that potential. Lets hope so at least so we can shift our safety help to our number 2 CB.

    3) Jenkins. Hopefully, the whole defense will run behind him as the anchor. He should be able to eat up 2 blockers.

    4) Leon Washington. On a team lacking playmakers, he is certainly one of two.

    5) Kerry Rhodes. See comment on Leon Washington.
     
  10. JetsLookingforDWare

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    5,545
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yea seriously. I mean...DeVito didn't look that bad and DL depth is important...but guys like Pennington, Baker, Thomas, Moore, and Miller are really are 5 most expendable players? Are we that good?
     
  11. The Dark Knight

    The Dark Knight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    27,177
    Likes Received:
    14,477
    Actually, I think he is going to be the starting safety for the Atlanta Falcons.
     
  12. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    According to people like you it really doesn't matter if you have enough talent around any of the above. Didn't Chad Pennington win a SB with the 2000 Cleveland Browns? The likelyhood is none of our QB's will make a hill of beans worth of difference so it really doesn't matter which one we start might as well dump based on cost.
     
  13. I recall him having a VERY good game against Miami at the end of the year and he def. made some other plays.

    What's funny to me is 1 year ago everyone thought Brad Smith was our future # 1 WR. He made alot of plays as a rookie and everyone was on the bandwagon. Then year 2 rolls around...and everyone forgets the guy was a converted QB...he struggles at different points in the season and suddenly he sucks and needs to be replaced ASAP.

    How short-sighted are some of you?? Did you really think even after his great rookie year that a converted QB wasnt gonna have some struggles? I REALLY don't get this. All I see is people failing to comprehend player development and not seeing the big picture. Especially after him having a very good rookie year.
     
  14. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    Most expendable - Chad Pennington. This guy should not even be on the roster.

    Also expendable - Barrett, Bender, Poteat, B Smith

    Least Expendable - Mangold, Rhodes, Revis, Harris, Faneca
     
  15. wewantsapp

    wewantsapp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,352
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Most Expendable;
    Chris Baker -- we have Keller & Franks
    Brad Smith -- just another mediocre WR and we have a couple of those already
    Eric Smith -- the experiment on this guy is very close to being Anthony Schlegel over
    David Barrett -- Justin Miller, Drew Coleman, Dwight Lowery + the fact that Barrett has a big paycheck
    Bryan Thomas -- we have Pace + Gholston, and I am even at the point where I believe David Bowens is better

    Least Expendable;
    D'Brick Ferguson -- no backup. Period.
    Kris Jenkins -- if he went down, it would be the sequel to the JETS dismal running defense of last year.
    Nick Mangold --- no backup.
    David Harris -- if he went down w/an injury, they may be able to move Pace or even Bowens inside, but it would ultimately ruin a season that we were all looking forward to.
    Darrell Revis --- our only shutdown corner. He goes down, & 2008 will turn into a f--king shooting gallery.
     
    #35 wewantsapp, Jun 23, 2008
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2008
  16. SameOldJets2008

    SameOldJets2008 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    0
    Most Expendable
    Barret- this guy has shown nothing but the ability to be mediocre to horrible

    Thomas- Bust that eats up money and a roster spot Expendable now with Pace and Gholston

    Chad- He's beyond done, its time to hand over the reins

    Musa Smith or Chatman- Too many runnningbacks and one is doomed to be cut

    Bender- I know people are going to kill me but in a year where our offensive line was HORRIBLE, he couldnt sniff the field. I think if he doesnt show flashes in TC we should cut the cord


    Least Expendable

    Revis- Shutdown top flight corner at a very young age too.

    Rhodes- Easily Top 5 Safety that is a playmaker

    D'Brick- Has shown flashes of Dominance, with better cast around him i see him taking the next jump.

    Mangold- Best young center in the game

    Jenkins- Having a real NT will do wonders for our 3-4 this year
     
  17. Tony

    Tony Bipedal, Reformed

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,010
    Likes Received:
    2
    I agree with your 5 most expendable, but I'd replace Cotchery with Mangold. Not that I dont like Cotch, because I do. It's just that I think Mangolds spot and talent level are harder to replace.
     
  18. The Dark Knight

    The Dark Knight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    27,177
    Likes Received:
    14,477
    I never thought he would be a future #1 for us, or any team. Kurt just read the question. That is all I and others are answering. I feel the team would not take a big loss if Smith was not on the team, especially after last year. Hopefully those who feel like me are wrong.
     
  19. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    You are quite right to figure bench depth into answering this question, except there is so little bench strength at a number of positions you don't mention. That would include OG, Qb (assuming Clemens starts - with Chad on the roster that's no depth there, either), wideout - even if Stuckey proves out, the rest of the guys are likely camp cuts, safety - after Rhodes the Jets don't have a solid starter alongside him.
     
  20. flgreen

    flgreen New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Smith will be on the team. he is a valuable player, and should contribute as a #4 WR this year. Problem is he had a nice rookie season, and everyone expected him to step up next year and be a star. He didn't, so now he must die
     

Share This Page