http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=expectthesenflteamstomis&prov=tsn&type=lgns 1. New York Jets The New England Patriots, who typically built their roster carefully and methodically, used an aggressive offseason in 2007 to position the franchise for an undefeated regular season. Jets general manager Mike Tannenbaum previously espoused a build-through-the-draft approach, but he paid out like a broken poker machine in March, giving huge-money deals to more than a few strangers to the franchise. Though the Patriots’ approach in ‘07 had an overriding sense of precision, the Jets’ offseason moves came off as reckless—almost desperate. The Jets have too many question marks, most notably at quarterback. Kellen Clemens, a second-round pick in ‘06, has struggled and thus gave Chad Pennington an unexpected shot at regaining the starting gig. The reality: Neither guy is the answer. More important, there is growing evidence that the players don’t trust the front office. Last year, it was Pete Kendall who claimed the team had reneged on promises to increase his pay. Then, wide receiver Laveranues Coles made an identical contention. Now, tight end Chris Baker is barking the same tune. Despite the Jets’ ambitions to compete with division rival New England and the New York Giants—those Super Bowl ring-wearing crosstown neighbors with whom the they share a stadium—the reality for the Jets is that winning the AFC East is a pipe dream, and securing a wild-card spot is a long shot. 2. Cleveland Browns The Browns are the trendy pick to make the ‘08 playoffs, given their sudden resurgence and near miss of the postseason a year ago. And so they’ll face the intense pressure and scrutiny that go along with high expectations. With a tough schedule, a bull’s eye on each side of that logo-less orange helmet and a full offseason for defensive coordinators to figure out how to stop quarterback Derek Anderson, it could be a long year for the Browns. Like the Jets, the Browns’ offseason spending smacks of desperation. They gave too much money to wide receiver Donte’ Stallworth and gave up too much for underachieving defensive tackle Shaun Rogers. The big question is whether Anderson can continue to perform at a high level. His “nothing to lose” mindset has been replaced by the burden of being the clear-cut starter, with an upstart first-rounder peering over his shoulder, anxious for Anderson to screw things up. Though the fans in Cleveland sorely deserve a winning team, the fact that last year’s team did so well without a playoff berth is going to work against the Browns this year. The end result could very well be another year without a postseason appearance. 3. Kansas City Chiefs On the surface, the addition of the Chiefs to this list is a no-brainer. The franchise is in obvious rebuilding mode, and coach Herm Edwards expects nine of the team’s 12 draft picks to suit up on Sundays this fall. But I’ve added them because some Kansas City fans don’t seem to realize that the team is closer to the bottom than the top. Indeed, there’s a strange sense of swagger that comes from a franchise that, in reality, has nothing to swagger about. Though confidence is a good thing, it needs a strong foundation. The Chiefs don’t have it, and thus the confidence from guys like Edwards and GM Carl Peterson is more accurately described as hubris. Come January, that hubris could be replaced by unemployment. 4. Detroit Lions Like the Chiefs, the Lions have far more confidence than their talent level warrants. Quarterback Jon Kitna can’t keep quiet; he again has predicted 10 victories. It didn’t happen in ‘07, and it won’t happen in ‘08. What have the Lions done to get better? The running back situation is a multi-headed crapshoot. The offensive line is average at best. And the defense is merely a collection of former Buccaneers who, if they were great players, would be current Buccaneers. Picking the Lions to miss the playoffs hardly represents a full-body shimmy onto a rubbery tree limb. However, it’s important to nip in the bud the annual sense that the law of averages will come into play and that this year will be the year for the Lions. 5. Arizona Cardinals Speaking of the law of averages favoring a certain NFL team, look for plenty of preseason prognostications for the Cardinals reaching the playoffs. Some might even think the Cardinals will win their second postseason game since the Truman administration. Don’t count on it. Coach Ken Whisenhunt has the team moving in the right direction, but two offseasons isn’t enough time to turn this team around. The offensive line still needs a lot of work, and the defense isn’t quite ready to perform like the unit that complemented Whisenhunt’s offense in Pittsburgh. Then there’s the quarterback position. Matt Leinart isn’t developing as anticipated, and Kurt Warner doesn’t have much time left. The starter/reliever approach the Cardinals used until Leinart (broken collarbone) landed on the injured reserve last year barely was working. Leinart likely won’t tolerate that approach in ‘08. But Warner says he still can play, and that passive-aggressive routine of his will cause problems if Leinart struggles and still gets the snaps. For any other franchise, it would be a recipe for trouble. In Arizona, it means that things will continue to be the same as they’ve been. 6. Carolina Panthers The Panthers have the talent. For whatever reason, they can’t put it all together. It has been that way for two seasons, since the Panthers lost to the Seattle Seahawks in the NFC championship game on Jan. 22, 2006. Once again, the Panthers look solid on paper, especially with a pair of first-round picks in running back Jonathan Stewart and offensive tackle Jeff Otah. But Carolina GM Marty Hurney still hasn’t done anything to establish a receiving threat across from Steve Smith or provide depth at quarterback behind Jake Delhomme, whose star is in danger of burning out for good. Come January, then, it’ll be another round of excuse-making for a team that should have been good enough to go places in the postseason but simply didn’t. Mike Florio writes and edits ProFootballTalk.com and writes two columns a week for Sporting News
The word "desperation" is used way too frequently in that article..and I only read up to half way through the Browns "analysis." And WTF are they talking about with recklessness? I didn't know you could just say something and it would instantly become true. I just read some more snippets and this guy just tries too hard to be funny...
Reckless? Desperate? What the hell do they want us to do, sit back and do nothing and expect to improve like we did last season? The Jets want to improve and our FO knows that, they should be praised for the moves they made this offseason.
This article lacks merit in my opinion. He does not address any of our off-season acquisitions to strengthen many of our weaknesses last season.
Who cares? I mean really no disrespect, but who gives a damn? I'm tired of what MOST columnists/sports writers have to say, either PRO or CON. Who gives a damn, because its normally a crap shoot, ESPECIALLY, when it comes to the JETS. So again, who cares, lets see what happens during the ACTUAL season.
He also said the defending Super Bowl Champions won't make the playoffs, and the Seahawks won't either. Class A retard.
I could definitly see the seahawks in the playoffs but it wouldnt surprise me if the giants didnt make the playoffs. If eli can play like he did in the playoffs last year they will be fine but i dont think he can do that for a full season
Excellent article. I love the national guys put our team down. Keep it up guys. As i say all the time, we know more then they do.
good lets just bring that "Jets" against the world mentality into the season and shock the world (or at least all the national sports writers)
Don't worry, by purposely not mentioning anything positive he already has the article written about the reasons we made the playoffs this year. Look for it in January.
I'm more worried when all the analysts think we will do well. . .that's the first sign of a big letdown at least if recent history has anything to say about it.
These writers are truly idiots. If I recall correctly the Jets gave up one draft pick in trades (#3) and they picked up another somewhere along the line. So they basically did build through the draft. It's not like they gave up all their picks to sign old expensive guys. All they did was spend money they had instead of just sit there and do nothing. I guess that's what they wanted us to do. Really these people need to get some real jobs.
2006 Patriots needed a quality starting wide receiver. They signed Kelley Washington, Dante Stallworth, traded for Wes Welker and traded for Randy Moss. They needed one wide receiver, they picked up FOUR. PRECISION! 2007 Jets needed a LG, a RT, a FB, an OLB, and a NT. We signed the best available LG in Faneca, a decent RT in Woody, the best available FB in Richardson, the best available OLB in Pace and traded for the best available NT in Jenkins. RECKLESSNESS! DESPERATION! Quite frankly, I agree. We were desperate. But after 4-12, you better be desperate. However, I refuse to believe that the Patriots overstocking their wide receiver core, ignoring the likes of Chad Jackson and Jabar Gaffney is somehow a PRECISE action. If it were precise, they'd have rings, period.
Yeah, finally the front office spent some money in the off-season to make our team better. Moreover, can this sports writer please elaborate and tell us which teams in the NFL aren't desperate to win a super bowl. Peace out.
