I don't believe the raiders will take McFadden

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by erasmus, Mar 27, 2008.

  1. Mr Electric

    Mr Electric Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    18,362
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'll make a deal with you: If the Jets make the playoffs before the Raiders do, you have to go to a random pawn shop...and buy a shotgun.

    You're not done yet though.

    Then, go to a hardware store, and buy some sort of saw.

    Go over to East Oakland, and ask a gang member to help you make a sawed-off shotgun with your newly acquired material.

    If the homeboys or eses don't kill you first, go home, and put that work of thug art in your mouth until it goes click.
     
  2. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    learn to read in context.

    What i quoted, no one gives a shit about.

    Stanford Routt? NO ONE CARES

    Yes, i came to the thread for McFadden and the intentions. Not Standford Routt and how amazing he might be in 2 years. Its your mindless promoting of your depth players that doesn't need to be written.

    If you want to be right, stay on topic. But to rant about Stanford fucking Routt like it matters on a Jet Board, please, do what Mr Electric instructs you to do above.
     
  3. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Okay When someone ( i believe it was you) go off topic and talk about Raiders wanted to get rid of there young Players(huff and Washington) I have to set the record straight. S Routt being Raiders starting CB last year, is not relative to question posed by you.
    Listen all I do is try and anwer thepoint someone else brought up. Its not me changing the thread.

    Go look at beginning of thread and see who changesd the subject of the thread.
     
  4. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    I challenged that fact that you nitpicked on Revis' rookie season without seeing the insane upside to him and how good he really is. I never mentioned Stanford Routt because i never heard of that name until you posted it. So instead of discussing Revis and Washington, you promoted Standford Routt when he did not come into question. Who's off topic now?
     
  5. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry but I don't believe in Guns or violence. Hey your team been horrible for 40 years and I don't see you holding up a gas station.

    BTW . Please tell me what good is putting the Gun in my mouth, and hearing the click, if there are no bullets in the chamber. See Houston we have a problem.
     
  6. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Again You brought up washington and Huff being trade pawns. I correctly stated that F Washington was way more consistant in coverage his rookie year than Revis was. (that is a fact) NOw F Washington didn't play as well his second season, for what ever reason. The point was . ITS TOO EARLY TO SAY REVIS IS SOME ELITE CB YET, AS HE ONLY HAS DONE IF FOR ONE HALF OF A SEASON. (you need to do it for longer period- which washington didn't do, but maybe Revis will)
    We don't kn ow what Revis is yet. He could be great like you think, or it could of been other factors that made him look better than he is. (mention already) Than what look like promising rookie Cb for the future turns into a diffrent looking Cb his second season.
    Another case in Point Phil Buchanon make alot of big plays at CB his rookie year to think he was going to be special. Never worked out that way after that.


    Reason Routt was brought up in first place is, I was correctly showing you the depth raiders have at CB. Why F Washington could be dealt? HE is the fourth string Cb at best.

    Look at J Vilma- Every Jet fans was getting his bust ready for canton . Look great his rookie year. It was understandable to have high hope for him. Didn't work out that way did it. Point is Revis might be great and he might not. Too early to make any kind of assessment yet. Its not Jet players R gallery Looked Great at RT ,N Harris looked great at LB for the Raiders, their rookie year. Only to go down hill from there.
     
    #66 Raiderjoe, Apr 7, 2008
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2008

  7. How is that a fact? Do you have access to coach's film and all the coverage audibles from BOTH of their rookie seasons? Or are you going based on random stats that support your agenda and the 2 random games you may have seen Revis play in compared to the 16 games you saw of Washington?

    Again I ask you...if we're as terrible, and irrelevant as you suggest, and that all of our young players are busts...why even waste your energy...we're not in your division and pose no immediate threat.
     
  8. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    I did bring that up since you wanted to essentially imply revis was on his way there as well in that post, its good too see you now say "its too early"- thats a lucid blanket statement accepted in all topics when speculating.

    but,you can inform me of the depth without describing them as the next Darrell Green. Tell me "Washington is on the block because we have so and so and he is now expendable"--- then i reply, "ok good to know"

    instead of "ZOMG Stanford Routt is god and he's gunna cure cancer!!!!"
     
  9. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    NO I seen both teams played every game. Raiders play man to man 98% of the time(more man to man than any team) Asomugha and F Washington were one best starting Duo in football in 2006. Number ONe passing defense in football. NOw to be fair like their could be other reason why Washington looked better than he was.(they don't only apply to Revis) Raiders had the worse offense in football in 2006. Why put the ball up (Like steelers found out- four picks of BIg Ben) and take chances when you can wait for the offense to self destruct.

    Still dosen't change the fact that F Washington gave up less completions on him than Revis did. (talking rookie year)
    I never said D harris or D Revis were bust. IF I was a Jet fan, I would be excited about their future. (they showed alot their rookie year) JUst we have to see if they can built on that sucess or they goingn to go backwards. ONLy time will tell.
     
  10. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    I never changed my point. S Routt was the starter over F Washington for most of 2007. Raiders outside CBs were never a problem. Raiders had problems with slot reciever. NOne of their QBs Asomugha, Routt or Washington like playing inside.

    I did say at one point, even if Revis proved in time to be a great cb. (alot of jet fans think he is already) IT still dosen't change the fact that you need three cbs in todays football. IF your a QB anD YOU Have Revis and J Miller. You be a dummy if you didn't challenge the weaker CB J Miller.
     
  11. JetsLookingforDWare

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    5,545
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not saying Routt's not talented...he's a pretty fuckin' sick talent actually....but Hall and Aso are two of the 5 best and most talented corners in the NFL and Routt's actually older than Hall is by a few months...

    Its so sick to see a team with 3 talents like that at CB...all in their early prime or peak years too...
     

Share This Page