Tony Hunt or Michael Turner

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Murrell2878, Jan 23, 2007.

  1. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,459
    Likes Received:
    858
    Who would you rather have with the 1st round pick? This is of course assuming Hunt impresses during the pre draft workouts and will be undraftable with the #37 pick? And why?
     
  2. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    Tony Hunt is a Second round RB at best...more than likely a 3rd rounder.

    Michael Turner is the best option at this juncture and would be an instant upgrade. Leon would be deadly in a backup/3rd down role.

    Get da burner!
     
  3. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,459
    Likes Received:
    858
    From what I understand Hunt is moving up the draft charts. However it is way early. I was just wondering with all the talk about a 1st round pick being too much for Turner, and with Hunt moving up the charts which would be the better choice.
     
  4. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    I hadn't heard that. The only thing that I know is that he will more than likely run a average/poor 40 at the combine and that tends to turn teams in the first round. Especially at his position.

    I like Turner over Bush and Irons as well.
     
  5. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,459
    Likes Received:
    858
    This was from a Senior Bowl report

    • Tony Hunt/RB/Penn State: Hunt surprised everyone by checking in a little heavier than expected at 239 pounds. Yet that seems to have positively affected his game. Hunt has been a monster carrying the ball on the inside and equally productive as a blocker.
     
  6. A.C.E.S

    A.C.E.S New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do you still want " THE BURNER " if SD is asking for a 1st round pick ?

    I won't do that, I will just go for Micheal Bush.
     
  7. SOWELLisGOD

    SOWELLisGOD New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    0
    agreed....
     
  8. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    I wouldn't be happy trading away the first, but I trust the front office and if they value Turner over that pick I say pull the trigger. I am not a fan of Bush or Irons either.
     
  9. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why would give up a first round pick for a back when our offensive line still can't run block????
     
  10. A.C.E.S

    A.C.E.S New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    0
    I get what you mean but I rather have Lamarr Woodley/Jarvis Moss-With Micheal Bush.
     
  11. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    Our offensive line can block. That is the biggest over statement this offseason.

    Our offensive line had two rookies playing the two most important positions on the line. They are going to get better at their jobs...and their job includes run blocking...

    Pete Kendall and Brandon Moore were the guards we had when we blocked for Curtis Martin's Rushing title.

    The only position which needs help is RT and that can be filled with a smart veteran signing.
     
  12. MANGINI RULES!

    MANGINI RULES! New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your Crazy Bro Running Backs Are A Dime A Dozen I Would Never Give Up A 1st For Turner....
     
  13. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0

    They cannot run block, week in and week out they didn't move people off the ball. Brandon Moore is not a starter, Clement is a horrible run blocker, Kendall is not big enough to move big fat defensive tackles off the LOS and Brick needs to gain about 25 pounds. Mangold was really the only good blocker we had. Our tight ends are not anything more then average blockers and we badly need a fullback. Your crazy if you think the only position that needs to be upgraded is RT.
     
  14. Jonathan_Vilma

    Jonathan_Vilma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    33,253
    Likes Received:
    32,098
    The Burner who pussyfoots his way through holes if they're not wide open. Chea!
     
  15. ThunderbirdJet

    ThunderbirdJet New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    6,697
    Likes Received:
    0
    Penny, I don't agree. Our RB's this year almost never got through the line without running through some trash first. Even if they broke tackles. it delayed their downfiled penetration and gave the defense more time to react.

    Moore was the weakest link in that line for Martin. Ferguson is not a good run blocker, and has a long way to go before he becomes one, if he does in fact, ever become a solid run blocker. . Mangold was much better than even hoped for given he was a rookie center. The right side of the O line isn't good. To make matters worse, Baker isn't much of a run blocker either.

    If the Jets are to establish a solid ground game, we need both a RG and a RT, and a good blocking TE would be helpful as well.
     
  16. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    You may have misunderstood me. The offensive line was DEFINITELY not good enough this past season and I am in complete agreement with your first paragraph. However, I still think this offensive line needs time to gel and mature as a group. If they are given a chance to gel I think the run blocking will come. As I mentioned previously, I think Brick and Mangold only get better and stronger so I am willing to bet their will be improvement in their runblocking.

    As for the TE comments...I never said we couldn't use a TE. I think we need a TE.

    My main point is, is why not address all of the run game needs?

    Who says we cant trade for Turner and make the necessary tweaks to the Oline? That is where I think the biggest misconception lies on this board. Just because someone wants Turner doesn't mean they want to blow off the offensive Line.
     
    #16 PennyandtheJets, Jan 23, 2007
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2007
  17. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    I don't want our first rounder to be used on the RB position. Use it to address the D-line, we need a pass rush.
     
  18. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    We certainly do need a pass rush, but who is to say we cant add a DE in the early or late second round?
     
  19. AlToon4prez

    AlToon4prez Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Turner.This isnt even close imo
     
  20. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    I feel the need for a true run stopping DT or pass rushing DE is needed much more than a RB.
     

Share This Page