I didn’t read all this but you have to understand the litigation is still pending, we have trials and everything in this country, why would they release all the things you are demanding before the trial also, when you use a 30.06 rifle it is not supposed to leave an exit wound. It appears the rifle worked as intended
If they release the same video of the guy on the roof but didn't clip out the 5 seconds prior we would see him taking the shot. To date there is zero evidence Robinson was even on the roof. Also strongly disagree a 30-06 would leave an exit wound. That's why they are claiming it was a miracle it didn't and that he was the man of steel. No one is believing it. The FBI lied. He was not shot by that gun which means Robinson was not the shooter. Their narrative has fallen apart and that's why Patel is trying to get in front now saying they will look at everything including hand motions, etc.
https://nypost.com/2025/09/21/us-ne...r-that-likely-prevented-more-from-being-hurt/ I agree. Hence why they are covering it up. If there was no exit wound then that means he wasn't shot by the gun they claimed which means Robinson was not the shooter and it was someone else.
That’s the surgeon that treated him. Doctors often say things like that off the cuff to help those that are grieving. “He saved others by dying” is a common refrain, not scientific analysis
Regardless it doesnt add up. If he was shot by the gun they claimed Robinson had there would be an exit wound. There was no exit wound therefore it means he was not shot by the gun they claimed, which means Robinson was not the shooter and it was someone else with a different gun that couldnt produce an exit wound. The narrative is falling apart.
There is no evidence suggesting any specific person to date. You can believe the FBI and Patel. I'm sure you believe Epstein had no victims either to because they said so.
I don't get your logic. You agree the FBI lied about Epstein but don't think they would lie about this case that has endless flaws and is continuing to fall apart day after day? What do both have in common and would give them large reason to cover for both? Israel
Yep. Who says the surgeon knows the first thing about ballistics? Oh! It was the turning point spokesman allegedly quoting an unnamed doctor! Who says the "dozens" of staffers, students and others behind him he saved by having bones of iron aren't invisible because in the picture with the red circle I can't see anyone, just a banner. Loaves, fishes, saving the best wine for last all over again?
The bullet could have been a fragmenting bullet, or could have hit a bone, just 2 of the reasons it may not have exited. Spokespeople are just trying to build the legend of Kirk, so Turning Point can keep fundraising off it.
No that’s not true and that’s lazy research. The term autism was coined in 1911 in a description of what ended up being schizophrenia or conditions similar to that. Hallucinations and other such psychological conditions adopted the term until the 1960’s or so when researchers began to look at autism differently. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3757918/ I don’t know anything about the root cause of autism or if acetaminophen has anything to do with causing it. Autism, however, is a huge problem in our society and the diagnosis rate has skyrocketed over the past 25 years. We should study it and try to figure out how to scale back the numbers dramatically. You disagree? Numbers just for reference; https://autismcenter.org/autism-through-the-years
I also don’t generally side with Sox on much but I find it hard to believe that a 30 caliber bullet that hits the side of the trachea doesn’t blow through the back of the neck at the purported distance. Given the angle that we all saw on the video of his death, it did not hit flush in the center to the point where it would at least cleanly strike his neck bone and subsequently stop. Assuming it doesn’t strike the neck bone at least flush, I’m sure someone smarter on the internet can do a physics equation that defies the probability that it wouldn’t exit his body. I’m not coming to any particular conclusion on what that means, but it doesn’t really seem to make sense that there’s no exit wound.
Why? It’s not proven but it’s not unfounded. A link has been found in studies. https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/using...-may-increase-childrens-autism-and-adhd-risk/ https://ysph.yale.edu/news-article/...bout-autism-and-tylenol-use-during-pregnancy/ https://www.drugs.com/news/acetaminophen-linked-autism-adhd-evidence-review-argues-126303.html The last article just explains the first two but it’s a bit easier to read than the science jargon from the Harvard study link. Do you ever look into anything on your own and try to draw your own conclusions? Or is it just Trump said it so I just refute? Like I said, I’m not sold on it being the sole causation or even having any particular causation. But I believe with absolute certainty there is an environmental causation to autism that human beings are perpetuating. I think the numbers overwhelmingly point to the fact that something’s going on here.
I’ve googled it too. And found articles all over the place. Enough to make me think that there is t enough evidence to completely debunk it, but also, certainly not enough for a “major announcement”. But for the president that likes to fling shit against the wall in hopes that it sticks, it’s not surprising . For any debate, I can quickly find articles to back up just about anything I’m trying argue. And I can then use it to defend my brand of politics. I’m sure as you found those articles, you passed over some that refute what those say. So that’s why I’m not posting links, despite the fact that yes, I have read on it.
There could be a link, but get this, I think people want to hear it from a doctor and not a senile real estate investor trying desperately to distract from the Epstein files
