Anyone else hope Darnold fails in Carolina?

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by Jets-N-Terps, Apr 16, 2021.

  1. ouchy

    ouchy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,229
    Likes Received:
    6,285
    Did people think I made that post because I wanted to keep Darnold? I'm not trying to prop Darnold up or cherry pick stats. It doesn't matter what stat you choose, Zach is worse than Sam in all of them. I'm pointing out that currently our QB is even worse than Darnold.
     
  2. REVISion

    REVISion Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    5,264
    Likes Received:
    9,083
    What you say is true but it's also an oversimplification. It's to be expected that a rookie QB won't be as good as a guy in his 4th full season. Wilson also costs about an eighth as much as Darnold will next year.

    Play doesn't happen in a vacuum. The price of the asset is directly related to its value.
     
    bicketybam likes this.
  3. bicketybam

    bicketybam Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Messages:
    9,741
    Likes Received:
    9,451
    Hard to believe Ouchy doesn't understand that.
     
    dawinner127 likes this.
  4. BrowningNagle

    BrowningNagle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    26,791
    Likes Received:
    27,800
    Darnold looks bad
    WIlson looks bad
    Fields looks bad
    Lawrence looks bad

    Mac Jones looks good :(:(

    worst outcomes imaginable
     
  5. JackBower

    JackBower Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Messages:
    7,217
    Likes Received:
    6,294
    No it's not. You've already lost any fine combed debate by comparing a 4 yr player to a rookie and saying it's apples to apples.. it's just not.
     
    bicketybam and dawinner127 like this.
  6. ouchy

    ouchy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,229
    Likes Received:
    6,285
    Except I compared it to his rookie year in the next post. But since you all persist lets take it further.

    After 6 games Sam had 9 TDs and 7 INTs with an 84% passer rating.

    After 6 games Zach has 4 TDs and 9 INTs with a 63% passer rating.

    ANd Sam's #1 and 2 were Anderson and Kearse. The hard truth is Zach has been worse than Darnold so far.

    (and no, I never wanted to keep Darnold)
     
  7. JackBower

    JackBower Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Messages:
    7,217
    Likes Received:
    6,294
    You just went from comparing Darnold this year to his rookie year. What you did is the definition of cherry picking.

    I don't see your post where shifted to Darnolds rookie year... But who cares? Sam is barely better in year 4 than a rookie QB. Who really gives a crap if he was better his first 6 games four years ago with the numbers he is posting now?
     
  8. Jonathan_Vilma

    Jonathan_Vilma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    32,970
    Likes Received:
    31,746
    You did want to keep Darnold. You were very vocal about it all offseason.
     
    bicketybam and REVISion like this.
  9. ouchy

    ouchy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,229
    Likes Received:
    6,285
    Sam is worse in year 4 than he was in year 1.

    And Zach has been worse than both iterations of Sam. That's the point you keep avoiding.

    @Jonathan_Vilma, show me the posts where I was very vocal about keeping Sam. I was trade Sam all the way.
     
  10. JackBower

    JackBower Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Messages:
    7,217
    Likes Received:
    6,294
    I am not avoiding that. I just wrote current Darnold is barely better than current Wilson. You are avoiding, or not putting enough stock into, Wilson is a rookie and Darnold is in his 4th year.

    This really isn't that complicated.
     
  11. Acad23

    Acad23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,270
    Likes Received:
    20,757
    I was watching the Kansas City Chiefs yesterday.

    Their quarterback looked worse than ours... :confused:
     
  12. Leicester Jet

    Leicester Jet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    882
    Mac Jones landed in the best place possible for him - Bama/Patriots are very similar in many ways and Saban and Belicheck run systems that require their Q/B's to do very similar things. I'm sure he wouldn't have played anywhere near as well if we had drafted him.
     
  13. apjbfc

    apjbfc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2012
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    981
    Glad Sam's gone now.

    Couldn't watch another jets QB get knocked to the floor by his own lineman. Least he held onto the ball though!

    Sent from my M2007J20CG using Tapatalk
     
  14. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    51,998
    Likes Received:
    23,700
    I'll take a little hit on this one.

    I was cool with keeping Sam to take the hits that the rookie is taking now. I was also cool with keeping Sam and not drafting QB this year but building up the trenches and having a solid foundation of a team to insert a new QB into down the line.

    Would it have been more entertaining than what we are watching right now? Maybe not, but it would have been more effective, that I think we're finding out pretty quickly.
     
    MoWilkBeast, ouchy and stinkyB like this.
  15. Jonathan_Vilma

    Jonathan_Vilma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    32,970
    Likes Received:
    31,746
    While I've always been all for building up the offensive line and such, it's starting to look like you need to build through the skill positions just as much, if not more.

    Not to say the line should be ignored, but it can be fixed without spending tons of capital. The Bengals are the flavor of the month and all right now but they have one first round pick and a bunch of mid to lower tier offensive line man doing a pretty good job while their skill players dominate.
     
  16. ukjetsfan

    ukjetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    4,448
    Likes Received:
    3,451
    It all comes down to talent evaluation. If you are good at it, you will bring in good players via the first-round, third-round, free agency, trade... whatever. If you are bad at talent evaluation you will bring in bad players via the first-round, third-round, free agency, trade... whatever.

    This is a generalisation. Even the best GM will bring in the odd dud, and even the worst will occasionally stumble into an All-Pro. But good players are available all over the place if you know what you're looking for.
     
    Losmeister and Jonathan_Vilma like this.
  17. Losmeister

    Losmeister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,087
    Likes Received:
    2,847
    THIS!!!

    add a dash of good coaching...
     
  18. Losmeister

    Losmeister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,087
    Likes Received:
    2,847
    let that STINK in
     
    dawinner127 likes this.
  19. Losmeister

    Losmeister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,087
    Likes Received:
    2,847
    sad to think the best Qbs Jets have drafted since Joe Namath are Ken Obrien and Chad Pennington.... and both those guys were not EVEN CLOSE to being elite...

    at their best, above average
     
  20. No Fly Zone

    No Fly Zone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,622
    Likes Received:
    1,279
    O'brien had a terrible O line (sound familiar?). They still should have gone to SB in '86... Stupid penalty cost them against brownies.

    Chad was a very good QB but injuries ruined his career. He had a noodle arm but dinking and dunking worked out pretty well for Tom Shady..
     
    mrjet80 and Brook! like this.

Share This Page